Home > South-East Asia >> Indonesia |
The Jakarta embassy actions in December 1995
By Edmund Thompson
Recent years have seen some important shifts in the struggle for East Timorese self determination and independence.
Within East Timor itself, an important new component of the liberation movement has emerged to complement the armed wing of the movement, which continues to wage guerrilla war against the Indonesian army of occupation. This new element is the clandestine, urban-based movement which is especially strong among East Timorese youth, who have spent most of their lives under Indonesian occupation. On October 12 1989 this new phase was launched onto the world stage, when, before the assembled international media, youth activists held a demonstration at the conclusion of a mass held in Dili by Pope John Paul II. In the following years, youth and student activists continued to extend and organise their clandestine network. Not only did they organise support for the resistance fighters in the hills, but they have also made use of every available opportunity to demonstrate to the world the depth of support in East Timor, especially among youth, for national liberation.
The depth of this support, and the strength of the clandestine movement, was most vividly demonstrated to the world on November 12 1991 when over 200 people were massacred by Indonesian troops in the Santa Cruz cemetery in Dili. They had been attending a funeral service for another young East Timorese activist, Sebastiao Gomes, who had been killed by troops two weeks before. In the aftermath of the Dili massacre and the intense repression which followed it, the struggle of the East Timorese people has become the focus of unprecedented international attention. In the years which have followed, especially following the capture and trial of CNRM (National Council of Maubere Resistance)leader Xanana Gusmao, the East Timorese liberation movement has more than ever recognised the international arena as a third crucial front for the liberation of their homeland -- alongside the armed and clandestine urban wings of the movement. Media coverage of human rights violations in East Timor and the continuing struggle there, as well as the growing international movement in solidarity with the East Timorese people, have put considerable pressure on the Indonesian regime and on the Western governments which provide it with financial and military support and are thus complicit in its occupation of East Timor.
One aspect of the radicalism and mood of confrontation in the new democratic student, youth and opposition movement in Indonesia has been a willingness to question and challenge the regime on issues which have previously been considered off-limits. These include the treatment of political prisoners, the tremendous massacres of 1965-6, and, very importantly, the occupation of East Timor. The older generation of human rights activists in Indonesia have been -- and continue to be -- very cautious on East Timor. Not only did they, in the past, face difficulties in attaining accurate information, but East Timor has generally been considered by them to be a taboo area where it is too dangerous to directly challenge the government. At most, they take up particular instances of human rights violations, but skirt around crucial issues like the history of the invasion and the right to self determination.
Thus, a fourth front has effectively been opened against the Indonesian occupation of East Timor: the struggle for democratisation within Indonesia itself, where the participants in that struggle increasingly view East Timorese self determination as a necessary component of their own campaign for the overthrow of the Suharto regime. Since the Dili massacre many activists in the East Timorese clandestine movement have been forced to flee repression in their homeland to Java (in particular, many left in mid and late 1995 following a series of riots and subsequent crack down in Dili and other towns). Other activists have come to Java under government programmes which aim to further 'integration' by bringing East Timorese youth to Java as students or workers. In effect, this has meant the transplantation of part of the clandestine movement to Java. An early indication of this was a demonstration by East Timorese youth in Jakarta which took place a few days after the Dili massacre in 1991. But no Indonesian activists were directly involved in that action. Since that time, many of these East Timorese activists have developed increasingly close contacts with Indonesian pro-democracy activists, especially those in SPRIM and PRD.
About a year later, in response to increasing repression in East Timor, a number of other 'embassy invasions' took place. The largest of these, up to that point, was the occupation of the Japanese embassy by 21 activists on November 14 1995 -- shortly after the fourth anniversary of the Dili massacre and immediately before the opening of the APEC conference in Osaka.
In the end, a total of 105 people managed to get inside the Dutch and Russian embassies: 58 in the Russian embassy and 47 in the Dutch embassy. In both embassies, as the documents in this collection show, the activists were put under great pressure to give up their protests. At the Dutch embassy a group of military-organised thugs actually invaded the compound to beat the protestors: wounding the ambassador in the process! In the end, the activists were turfed out of the Russian embassy on December 8 and out of the Dutch embassy on December 9. Both groups of demonstrators were immediately taken for 24 hours' interrogation. Since that time, although some of them have been temporarily detained and others are still wanted for questioning, the fact that none have been detained for a longer period itself represents a victory for the international campaign which was coordinated by the organisers of the protests, leaders of the East Timorese movement and their supporters all around the world.
The embassy occupations involved three fronts in the struggle for East Timorese independence -- the East Timorese clandestine, urban based movement; the struggle for world media attention and international solidarity; and the new and emerging struggle for the support of the Indonesian pro-democratic movement. Because of its historic nature, ASIET views it as important to document this action.
The documents which follow all serve to introduce various aspects of this action. There are press reports, statements and chronologies, interviews, and petitions -- all of which were produced at the time of the action and flashed around the world by electronic mail. In this dossier, each document is introduced by a brief comment which aims to provide the reader with necessary background information.