East
Timor
Government/politics
Regional
conflicts
Aceh/West
Papua
Labour
struggle
News
& issues
Environment/health
Arms/armed
forces
Economy
& investment
Army
members urged to leave West Timor or resign: UN
Agence
France Presse - April 28, 2000
Geneva
-- The United Nations welcomed on Friday a campaign by Indonesia to get
East Timorese members of the Indonesian army in West Timor to resettle
in other parts of the country or resign from the military.
Resettlement
forms have been distributed by the government in camps in West Timor for
an estimated 2,000 East Timorese military men, said Ron Redmond, spokesman
for the UN High Commisssioner for Refugees.
They
are being asked if they want to leave the West Timor camps and join the
government's programme for resettlement, he said. If they choose to stay
in West Timor, they must resign from the army.
"This
is very welcome news for UNHCR. It comes at a time when the number of returnees
from West Timor to East Timor has dropped sharply in recent weeks," Redmond
said.
"UNHCR
has been urging the Indonesian government to separate East Timorese military
people and former militia members in the camps to eliminate the intimidation
and to accelerate the return process to East Timor," he added.
"We
believe that about 50,000 of the remaining 100,000 refugees remaining in
West Timor would return to East Timor if they were free of intimidation,"
he said.
Redmond
said although security and access to the camps had improved, pro-Indonesian
elements still had a "pretty tight control" and opposed repatriation through
misinformation and intimidation.
Small
groups of East Timorese army members have already been demobilised and
returned to East Timor, UNHCR said. The distribution of the forms has started
at Tuapukan and Noelbaki camps, which are the largest of the West Timor
camps hosting the remaining refugees. More than 160,000 East Timorese have
returned home since October.
Some
250,000 refugees fled or were forcibly deported to West Timor during a
wave of Indonesian army-backed militia violence which swept East Timor
in September after the territory voted for independence from Indonesia.
'Former
minister killed journalists'
Straits
Times - April 28, 2000
Marianne
Kearney, Jakarta -- Former Information Minister Yunus Yosfiah has been
accused of murdering five Western journalists in East Timor in 1975 by
a new witness who gave evidence on an Australian television show.
The
accusations by Mr Tomas Goncalves -- a former East Timorese partisan soldier,
and the only known witness to the event -- contradict Indonesian and Australian
government reports which said Timorese soldiers accidentally killed the
journalists in cross-fighting. The show was aired on Australia's Dateline
programme on Wednesday.
Mr
Goncalves, who headed the Timorese-trained forces accompanying Indonesian
soldiers as they invaded East Timor from West Timor, said the five journalists
had tried to surrender but were shot in cold blood.
"They
came out, three at the back, one at the front, with their hands up. Their
intention in coming out [of the house] was to survive. They thought they
would get protection. Yunus had other ideas, his reaction was to fire straight
away. He started first ... he started shooting and then everyone joined
in. You know it's war and they all wanted promotion," Mr Goncalves said
on the programme.
He
claimed Mr Yunus had to shoot the five journalists -- two Australian, one
New Zealander and two British, all working for Australian television stations
-- "so they would not publicise what they saw to the outside world".
Mr
Yunus has previously denied being at Balibo when the journalists were killed
and this week refused to respond to the allegations made by Mr Goncalves.
The
five journalists were in the border town of Balibo, then part of Portuguese
Timor, to report on whether it was true that Indonesia was planning to
invade East Timor and had launched sorties into the province.
With
already strained relations between Australia and Indonesia, Australian
Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer said his government would not
lodge a complaint or propose a further inquiry. "There will be no judicial
inquiry, we've already had two. At the moment we've done all that we can,"
he said.
Commentators,
such as a former Australian consul to East Timor, Mr James Dunne, say East
Timor's fate may have been significantly different if the journalists had
survived to report on the Indonesian invasion, and there had been Western
opposition to Indonesia's plans.
Despite
quite good intelligence material to the contrary, the Australian, American
and British governments claimed no knowledge of Indonesia having sent troops
into East Timor in preparation for their invasion.
Ms
Shirley Shackleton, widow of one of the Australian journalists, called
on the government to hold a full judicial inquiry into the journalists'
deaths based on new evidence.
Militia
leader jailed for firearms
Sydney
Morning Herald - April 28, 2000
Mark
Dodd, Suai -- An Indonesian court has jailed the notorious militia leader
Laurentino Soares, known as Moko, for up to three years for illegally possessing
firearms, according to United Nations observers.
UN
military officials said yesterday that Soares, who is wanted by the UN
in connection with armed violence and murders committed in the East Timor
enclave of Oecussi, was appealing against Wednesday's sentence.
The
officials, speaking in the East Timor town of Suai, said they had been
advised of the sentence by UN observers who attended the trial in Indonesian
West Timor.
The
jailing is the first evidence that Indonesian authorities are making serious
efforts to crack down on militia leaders in West Timor.
Another
prominent militia leader, Eurico Guterres, was questioned this week by
Indonesian police and military over a shooting six weeks ago. Guterres
allegedly fired shots at a government-owned car. He was allegedly found
to possess a machine-gun.
Senior
UN military commanders and diplomats welcomed the news of Soares's sentencing.
Brigadier Duncan Lewis, UN commander of the western sector, which takes
in East Timor's 170-kilometre border with Indonesia, appealed to Indonesian
authorities to hand over other militia leaders sought over crimes committed
during bloody post-ballot violence in September.
"For
militia leaders in West Timor who have a case to answer, it would be a
serious confidence-building measure if they could be brought to face due
process," he said.
"I
hear Eurico Guterres has been firing shots at Indonesian police, but I
don't see yet any action taken against him. The fate of those militia leaders
could be taken as a good measure of Indonesian Government intent. I continue
to be concerned at the number of militia leaders who are still at large
in West Timor."
A second
Indonesian Army battalion deployed along the border indicated "a good spirit
of co-operation" from the Indonesian military, Brigadier Lewis said. "I'm
rather less worried about what's happening on the border compared to what
is happening beyond the border."
A
tower of babel for Timorese as they seek a language
New
York Times - April 27, 2000
Seth
Mydans, Dili -- There is not much question about the language of commerce
here as East Timor begins to define itself as a nation. The muddy central
market is alive with the cries of moneychangers: "Dollar America! Dollar
America! America, America, America, America!"
What
is much less clear, however, and far more hotly emotional, is the question
of the actual spoken language of East Timor, a question that goes to the
heart of the self-definition of the world's newest nation.
Will
it -- like the dollar -- be the language of the international marketplace,
English? Will it be the dominant local language, Tetun, with its broad
usage but limited vocabulary? Will it be the colonial language, Portuguese,
the sentimental favorite of the older generation? Or will it be Indonesian,
the common language of the young and the educated?
East
Timor has not been on its own as a modern nation, its history overlaid
by more than 400 years of Portuguese colonialism followed by 24 years of
Indonesian occupation that ended last year. What will it keep from the
past and what will it angrily discard? What is Timorese and what is an
unwelcome import by foreign interlopers? What does it mean, as the nation
emerges from its trauma, to be Timorese?
For
many here, the answers lie in the choice of a national language. Although
the nation is physically ruined and emotionally traumatized, its people
hungry and mostly jobless, it is the question of language that sets off
the angriest debates, hinting at social divisions that lie not far below
the surface.
Rough
statistics show the breakdown. About 60 percent of the population speaks
Tetun (which is sometimes called Tetum). As many as 90 percent of people
under 35 speak Indonesian, as do 40 percent of those over 35. But just
10 percent speak Portuguese, almost all of them in the older generation.
After
Indonesia's invasion in 1975, the clandestine East Timorese leadership
decided that the language of a future independent nation would be Portuguese.
After a generation of struggle, these same leaders -- now middle-aged men
-- have formally announced that this will be the national language, in
honor of their country's past and of their own independence struggle.
But
their announcement has only spurred further debate, for it would make linguistic
outsiders of the great majority of East Timorese, pushing them to the sidelines
of national reconstruction. Those most affected would be the people most
vital to building a nation, young people with education and skills.
"For
24 years they forced us to learn Indonesian," said Helder Luis Pires, 25,
a university student, speaking in Indonesian. "Now the political leaders
want to force us to speak Portuguese. If they continue to do that there
will be a big conflict between the young and old generations."
Oscar
Lopes, 22, another student, agreed. "Europe is awfully far away," he said.
"And take a look at Europe. Even there, almost nobody speaks Portuguese.
Who are we going to talk to?"
To
promote its language, Portugal has sent a contingent of language teachers
to offer courses here, but this only makes some of the young people angrier.
"Now is the time to work, not to study language," said Ivete de Oliveira,
25, a pro-independence activist who, like 20,000 other Timorese over the
past 24 years, studied in Indonesia.
"We
object," she said, speaking in English. "They don't respect us and they
don't respect our education. In the future who will handle the country?
The future is in the hands of the youth. But they are from the '75 generation
and they don't think about us. Using Portuguese means they will control
the government and there will be no place for us."
She
added: "It was not the Indonesian language that traumatized us. Maybe the
Indonesians did, but not their language. Their language has made us more
rich, and in the future we will have close relations with Indonesia."
If
Portuguese does become the national language, an entire nation will need
to convert itself linguistically, starting with school children who will
be taught in a language most of their parents do not know.
Whatever
the rules, the court system will for the time being operate in Indonesian.
All the nation's lawyers were trained in Indonesia and until a new legal
code is written, a modified form of Indonesian law will apply.
If
the new Timorese government is determined to rid all vestiges of the Indonesian
occupation and teach everybody a new common language, some people argue,
then why not go all the way and learn the world's international language,
English? Jose Ramos Horta, a longtime independence propagandist, has an
answer: "English is a commodity, not a culture."
Rebuilding
Timor's education system
The
Melbourne Age - April 27, 2000
Mark
Dodd, Dili -- When pro-Jakarta militias went on their rampage of arson,
murder and looting last September they filled the classrooms of Dili's
secondary schools with drums of fuel to ensure maximum damage before torching
the buildings.
Their
efforts were mostly successful and today, apart from a handful of church-run
schools, East Timor is without a secondary education system. Most of the
country's 140 secondary schools lie in ruins.
Higher
education in East Timor has effectively stopped, according to UNICEF. About
80 per cent of secondary teachers were Indonesian, as were most staff of
the Department of Education and the training institutes. They have left
the territory and most are not expected to return.
One
result has been that young East Timorese men and women, who should be in
school, are instead part of a growing pool of disaffected youth.
East
Timor's primary school system fared somewhat better although UNICEF spokesman
Richard Koser said that most school buildings across the country were destroyed
or damaged in the September violence.
"About
90 per cent of school buildings were badly damaged or destroyed, and movable
items were either looted or burnt. Most primary school teachers were Timorese,
but most were displaced in the violence," Mr Koser said.
The
damage bill runs into the millions of dollars but UNICEF has now begun
a program to get the primary school system back up and running with the
help of the World Bank.
Before
August 1999, there were about 160,000 children in primary schools across
East Timor. By the start of this month an estimated 147,000 were students
back in primary schools, and of the nearly 800 primary schools operating
in East Timor before the referendum, 420 were up and running by December,
a number that has now increased to 693.
"When
UNICEF arrived in East Timor last September we decided one way to get some
routine back in people's lives was to get the schools back up and running,"
Mr Koser said.
A novel
incentive scheme in which primary teachers were paid a small salary and
given a rice handout was a temporary measure in place until the new UN-trained
East Timor Civil Service took over, he said.
Until
then, UNICEF was the de facto education ministry in East Timor. The quality
of teachers was questionable and no fixed curriculum had been endorsed,
he added. "There is no standard curriculum. People [teachers] are just
doing what they know -- reading, writing and arithmetic."
Under
the Indonesian administration, the education system in East Timor was bloated
and ineffective. Teachers were poorly trained and unmotivated, teaching
a national curriculum to students unwilling to learn about the history
and culture of Indonesia.
One
legacy is left from the 24 years of Indonesian rule from 1975 until 1999
-- the language of instruction in primary schools remains Indonesian, Mr
Koser said.
Social
unrest could force UN troop cuts in East Timor
Sydney
Morning Herald - April 27, 2000
Mark
Dodd, Dili -- The United Nations mission in East Timor is considering reducing
its 8,000-strong peacekeeping force because of concerns over costs and
possible social problems created by its military presence.
Mr
Fabrizio Hochschild, the special assistant to the UN Special Representative
in East Timor, said yesterday that a reduced peacekeeping force was likely
if security continued to improve. "Our peacekeeping force is already significantly
smaller in terms of numbers than the Interfet force," he said.
The
peacekeeping force, with an authorised strength of 9,000, took over in
February from the Australian-led International Force in East Timor (Interfet),
which at its peak numbered almost 10,000.
"It
is a significant burden on the international taxpayer and there are, as
many have highlighted, social implications in having such a large number
of foreigners in a relatively small country," Mr Hochschild said. "As the
security situation allows, we do envisage a downsizing."
Another
factor weighing in favour of reducing peacekeeping-force numbers is growing
confidence in security following the signing of a border agreement with
Indonesia last month.
The
pro-independence political umbrella group, the CNRT, has expressed mixed
feelings about the size of the peacekeeping force and its potential to
create social problems.
A spate
of border incursions last month from Indonesian West Timor caused several
senior CNRT officials to query whether the peacekeeping force was large
enough.
But
one senior CNRT official, who asked not to be named, said yesterday that
the real problem was not the size of the peacekeeping force but the size
of the UN mission as a whole, and their lavish lifestyles.
"I
think it is very obvious that East Timorese are becoming more and more
marginalised," the official said. "It is almost as though an elite world
has been created by the UN expatriate community."
The
UN had failed in its promise to engage East Timorese in the transitional
process and this was resulting in growing resentment by local people. Mass
unemployment remained one of the biggest social problems to be addressed,
the official said.
As
well, East Timorese society was "very conservative" and there were fears
about the spread of sexually transmitted diseases by a large foreign population,
including peacekeepers.
Lieutenant-Colonel
Fergus Bushell, a military spokesman for the UN transitional authority,
said there had been "zero problems" between the peacekeeping force and
East Timorese.
"There
seems to be a misapprehension that all these foreign people are somehow
going to corrupt their [East Timorese] culture," he said. Pressure to reduce
the size of the force was more likely to be coming from donor countries
anxious about the cost of the deployment.
Dili's
Nobel laureate, Bishop Carlos Belo, has also raised concerns that a large
UN presence in East Timor could lead to unwelcome social problems, including
a sex industry.
UN
steps in to help defuse anger over high unemployment
Sydney
Morning Herald - April 26, 2000
Mark
Dodd, Dili -- The East Timorese leader, Mr Xanana Gusmao, and a senior
United Nations official will hold a public meeting in Dili today to discuss
the the country's number one social problem -- unemployment.
Unemployment
estimated at around 80 per cent has been the main cause of mounting protests
outside the UN headquarters in Dili for several months. Earlier this month,
Mr Gusmao was called on to pacify a group of about 1,000 protesters upset
that the UN could not provide work for them.
Yesterday,
UN employees held a stopwork meeting over pay and conditions linked to
new contracts in which salaries are paid in US dollars.
One
employee claimed his pay packet had shrunk since signing the new contracts
because of losses incurred when US dollars -- the local legal tender --
are exchanged for Indonesian rupiah, the preferred currency among locals.
Up to 200 UN employees, mostly drivers, are believed to be involved in
the industrial action. Locals are unfamiliar with the US dollar and complain
there is no small change in circulation and few official exchange facilities.
A UN
Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET) spokeswoman, Ms Barbara
Reis, said it was hoped today's meeting would clarify what job opportunities
existed with the UN.
She
said stolen UN job application forms were selling in the local market on
the promise that once completed they were a guarantee of employment.
The
UN chief of staff, Parameswaran Nagalingah, would explain what opportunities
existed with the UN and how to apply, Ms Reis said.
UNTAET
currently employs 1,100 East Timorese. Another 6,000 are employed by a
US-funded employment project worth $US5 million ($8.4 million) which has
put East Timorese to work on community clean-up projects. A similar scheme
funded by Japan has hired work gangs to clear roadside verges of thick
undergrowth.
But
all these projects are short-term. Mr Gusmao is expected to stress that
political stability and security in the capital are a prerequisite for
attracting foreign investors able to offer long term employment prospects
to East Timorese.
Wahid,
Rais, partners - as in sparring
Asiaweek
- May 5, 2000
Jose
Manuel Tesoro, Jakarta -- On April 20, in a house on Irian Street in Jakarta's
residential district of Menteng, two top Indonesian leaders broke fast
together. According to People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) chairman Amien
Rais, he told President Abdurrahman Wahid: "I do not want to see you overthrown,
because I am among those most responsible for bringing you the presidency."
It seemed like an apology, but could also have been a warning. For at least
a week, tension between the two had put the longevity of Wahid's six-month-old
government in question. It touched off a swirl of speculation not seen
since his high-profile battle against Gen. Wiranto, the country's former
military head and chief political minister.
The
tussle between Wahid and Rais had begun in mid-April, when the latter suggested
a special MPR session to demand an accounting from the president.
The
move targeted the government's lackluster performance as well as Wahid's
controversial bid to rescind a 34-year-old ban on communism. Rais declared
he would never flinch from "tweaking" Wahid's ear, should the Muslim cleric-turned-president
be found wanting. Away on state visits, Wahid shot back that if the MPR
accepts his explanations, Rais "could later be tweaking his own ears."
On April 18, Wahid's National Awakening Party demanded Rais's removal.
Retorted the MPR chief: "Only a president can be impeached by an Assembly
speaker."
The
episode underlines how dependent Indonesia's stability is on cordial relations
among its main leaders: Wahid, Rais and Vice President Megawati Sukarnoputri.
Where each leans, so do the major social groups that follow them -- Wahid's
traditional, largely rural, Javanese Muslims, Rais's mostly urban, modernist
Muslims and Megawati's hardline secular nationalists. Akbar Tanjung, who
commands former Suharto vehicle Golkar and the second-largest bloc of votes
in parliament, is another key figure. In the nation's turbulent, post-Suharto
transition, all four have competed as often as they have cooperated. Wahid's
continuing consolidation of his presidency may now have opened up a new
period of friction.
Despite
his decisive role in getting Wahid elected over Megawati, Rais has not
shied away from public criticism of the president. In early January, he
addressed in Jakarta Islamist protesters stoked up by religious strife
in Maluku and demanded that the government take responsibility for it.
"My heart is hot, my head is hot," cried the MPR chairman. Now, there is
admittedly more about which to "tweak" Wahid's ear. Last week, the rupiah
fell briefly past 8,000 to the dollar, the most immediate sign of the government's
drift in economic policy. (After the International Monetary Fund affirmed
its faith in the administration, the currency recovered slightly.)
Complaints
about corruption -- especially among newly appointed officials -- continue.
Court rulings against investors or reformers have cast a shadow on the
economy. On April 24, Wahid fired two members of his economic team. One
was respected investment and state-enterprises chief Laksamana Sukardi,
a member of Megawati's party. The other: trade boss Jusuf Kalla of Golkar.
Wahid's
long-rumored move still invited questions. "He thinks that changing the
cabinet automatically will help the economy," says economist Umar Juoro.
"I don't know." Whatever the economic benefit, there is a political cost.
Some members of both sacked men's parties have demanded that their groups
withdraw all their ministers from Wahid's cabinet in protest.
The
turmoil is beginning even as the president's stratagems are starting to
pay off. On April 21, armed forces chief A.S. Widodo delivered to the president
the results of an annual two-day military leadership meeting. The forces
had decided that they would give up their "socio-political" function. For
30 years, the dwifungsi (dual-function) doctrine had allowed the military
to involve itself in civilian affairs. The move furthers the expulsion
of the armed forces from Indonesian politics -- a process Wahid began in
February by retiring Gen. Wiranto from both the cabinet and active service.
The
other significant political achievement of the government is the tempering
of communal tensions -- which Wahid had engineered along with Rais. In
the run-up to the October presidential election, Wahid, then head of the
Nahdlatul Ulama mass Muslim organization (which claims 30 million members),
visited Rais at the latter's office at Muhammadiyah (another mass Muslim
group). The symbolic message was important: that the traditional and the
modernist strains of Indonesian Islam, represented by the NU and the Muhammadiyah
respectively, could rise above their historical frictions and create an
effective coalition. Says Hafiez Luqman of the Islamic Defenders' Front:
"The two showed that they could work together."
Can
they still? The recent spike in the political temperature has partly to
do with Rais's current political needs. While the reserved Megawati has
found her spare-wheel role as vice president to her liking, Rais is still
struggling to find his place in the public eye. The MPR meets at most once
a year to approve items such as constitutional changes; its next session
is in August. That leaves Rais's post largely ceremonial the rest of the
year. Such factors may account for his fondness for pushing hot-button
issues for Muslim voters -- like Maluku and communism -- to boost his own
standing. To give himself a real shot at becoming Indonesia's next president,
Rais needs to increase the disappointing 7.4% of the popular vote that
his National Mandate Party won in the parliamentary elections last June.
Rais's broadsides also remind Wahid that the MPR boss is very much a player.
But
Wahid often turns Rais's statements to his own advantage. The president
has cannily used criticism to get coalition partners to reaffirm their
loyalty. After Rais's January rally, Wahid's insinuation that some parties
were out to undermine his government prompted declarations of support from
Tanjung's Golkar and Megawati's Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle
(PDI-P).
On
April 24, Foreign Minister Alwi Shihab warned that such sparring statements
give the impression that Indonesia is unstable. He urged greater efforts
by everyone concerned to project unity. "When will investors come in?"
he lamented. Still, charitable responses to criticism have given Wahid
a chance to burnish his democratic credentials. When an April 23 NU rally
in Surabaya turned into a forum for blistering verbal attacks on Rais,
Wahid gamely declared: "If we are to be democrats, we must be able to cope
with our differences."
Even
so, such conciliatory pronouncements have not erased the underlying tensions.
With the latest reshuffle, the third since Wahid took power, the president
has further reduced the number of ministers that his coalition partners
have in his cabinet. The Islam-linked United Development Party, the military,
Golkar and the PDI-P each now has one minister fewer than before. That
none of the replacements came from the same parties has fueled complaints
that Wahid is edging everyone else out of their rightful place at the trough
of power.
Unsurprisingly,
Rais has joined the fray. If Golkar and the PDI-P do withdraw their people,
he warned on April 25, "that means the administration will enter a condition
of endangered legitimacy." How the president's allies-cum-rivals deal with
his continuing efforts to curb their clout may determine whose ears get
tweaked at the MPR's August session.
Wahid's
calls to nationalism risk alienating Singapore
Strathfor
Intelligence Update - April 26, 2000
Indonesian
President Abdurrahman Wahid said April 25 that foreign submarines must
not sail through Indonesia's territorial waters without permission. He
specifically warned Singapore, which has two brand new Swedish subs, that
any movement outside the established transit corridor into Indonesian waters
would warrant "stern actions." He also suggested that Indonesian forces
take future action against fish poachers.
Wahid
appears to have turned to nationalism to ease rising political friction
in Jakarta. But because there is no distinct Indonesian identity, he is
building one by creating a sense of collective embattlement -- Indonesia
versus the world. Wahid hopes to convert furor over internal politics into
indignation directed abroad. Yet such a ploy could have unwanted side effects
if Wahid's statements alienate regional allies. If the administration pounces
on Singapore, for example, to solve internal problems, it could lessen
the possibility of receiving foreign investment and support.
Many
other confrontational statements precede the one Wahid made today. Just
days ago, he warned the Australian government, which regularly flies planes
into Indonesian airspace, to respect those boundaries or risk being shot
down. In mid-April, he played up his refusal to obey a US State Department
official who asked him not to travel to Cuba; "We are not a lackey of the
US," he said. And in late March, he applauded military plans to build new
bases, warning of an "international conspiracy" to undermine development
in the East.
In
Indonesia's geographically and ethnically disparate provinces, nationalism
does not occur naturally. The country consists of 17,000 islands, of which
6,000 are inhabited by more than five different -- often clashing -- ethnic
groups. Therefore, Wahid is creating national identity by defining Indonesia
in opposition to others.
Interestingly,
this could actually turn any dearth of foreign financial assistance into
a political asset; he can argue that foreign powers not only disrespect
territorial boundaries, but are hampering the country's economic growth
as well. Historically, nationalism has allowed many troubled governments
to maintain their grip on power. Under populist and nationalist Sukarno,
the founder of Indonesia, the country experienced a period of political
stability.
But
at the same time, inflamed nationalist pride built solely on opposition
to other countries could be dangerous for a nation almost completely dependent
upon foreign support. Wahid's statements today, for example, could trouble
relations with neighboring Singapore, especially if similar warnings ensue.
To date, Singapore has been Indonesia's most loyal cheerleader, calling
on ASEAN members, Hong Kong and others to invest in the country. Already,
Indonesia has snuggled up to Malaysia, which clashes regularly with Singapore
over bilateral issues. It might not take much Indonesian obstinacy to convince
Singapore to shelve its pom-poms entirely.
Graft
rumors swirl after reshuffle
Jakarta
Post - April 28, 2000
Jakarta
-- Legislators said after a closed-door consultative meeting that President
Abdurrahman Wahid told them his decision to replace two economics ministers
was due to their alleged involvement in corruption, collusion and nepotism.
Legislator
Meliono Suwondo of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI Perjuangan)
said Abdurrahman revealed that the Cabinet reshuffle was due to corruption.
Meanwhile,
a chairman of a Muslim party faction at the House of Representatives, speaking
on condition of anonymity, also said that suspicions of impropriety was
the reason given by the President for axing Laksamana Sukardi and Yusuf
Kalla as state minister of investment and state enterprises development
and minister of trade and industry. "It's not because they could not work
together, but the President said that it was because of graft," the senior
legislator said.
Golkar
Party legislator Ekky Syachrudin further confirmed that the President had
said corruption was the reason for the replacement, and not his earlier
public statement that a lack of teamwork was the reason. "The two ministers
should be asked for confirmation since it could defame them," he said.
The
legislators said Laksamana was suspect due to his decision of replacing
several directors in state enterprises overseen by his ministry, while
concern over Yusuf was related to the minister's brothers who joined tenders
in the ministry.
House
Speaker Akbar Tandjung was more reserved about the accounts of the meeting
between the President and leaders of the House. Akbar acknowledged that
the four-hour meeting, usually open to the media, was closed because the
President wanted to reveal the reasons behind the replacement of the two
ministers.
However,
he would not reveal the allegations against the two ministers, saying only
that he and the Golkar Party were "not satisfied" with the explanation.
"We still cannot fully accept the reasons before we get clarification from
the concerned [former] ministers," Akbar, who is also the Golkar Party
chairman, said, adding that the party would consider withdrawing its representatives
in the Cabinet if the accusations were proved untrue. Meliono also said
PDI Perjuangan was "not satisfied with the explanation". "Actually, we
wanted to ask more questions on these accusations, but the meeting was
already ending," he said.
Apart
from discussing the Cabinet reshuffle, which took up the majority of time
in the consultative meeting, the President also reiterated his desire to
revoke the People's Consultative Assembly Decree No. 25/1966, which bans
communism. "Abdurrahman agreed that the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI)
could be banned, but he disagreed with a ban on communism and Marxism,"
Meliono said.
The
President confirmed weeks of speculation when he revamped half his economics
team by appointing on Wednesday Lt. Gen. (ret) Luhut Panjaitan as the minister
of industry and trade, and Rozy Munir as state minister for investment
and state enterprise development.
Initially,
Abdurrahman said the reason was the axed ministers' inability to work together
with Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industry Kwik Kian
Gie and Minister of Finance Bambang Sudibyo.
Abdurrahman
said there was disunity and that the two axed ministers failed to implement
economic reforms mandated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) resulting
in a freeze of the US$400 million installment of its $5 billion rescue
package for Indonesia.
While
Laksamana could not be contacted for a response to the allegations, Yusuf
Kalla went on the offensive later on Thursday by meeting with Golkar Party
colleagues to refute the various allegations of graft, among which was
the charge concerning the state-owned electrical company PT PLN tender
for the Paiton project in East Java.
Yusuf
maintained that despite the fact the tender was done fairly, certain parties
had maliciously slandered him. "There was a certain party who whispered
to Abdurrahman," he said without elaborating.
"This
case was examined by [Attorney General] Marzuki Darusman and the Inspectorate
General of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Everyone said it was clean
without any intervention ... And it should be given to [the winners of
the tender] the Bukaka-Megaeltra and Wijaya Karya consortium," Yusuf said.
The
reverberations concerning accusations of graft were also felt outside the
House building. A Cabinet minister, who asked not to be named when contacted
by The Jakarta Post, said among the reasons for the dismissals was the
President's exasperation at the ministers' half-hearted policies due to
their self-interest.
When
asked to be more specific, the minister said Laksamana had gathered an
investors forum with direct access to him but without the knowledge of
the President. "Another example was during the PT Indosat shareholders
meeting which invited the director of Indosat but elected a commissioner
as president.
"That
was not consulted with Abdurrahman or other ministers." Turning his attention
to Yusuf Kalla, the minister without elaboration merely said: "He used
to be against regulating the sugar trade, but all of a sudden he is strongly
campaigning for it."
Abdurrahman
must beware of growing political divisions
Jakarta
Post - April 28, 2000
Disappointment
with Abdurrahman Wahid's (Gus Dur) government is leading to strange bedfellows,
with the former ruling party, Golkar, the faction being most courted, says
observer Azyumardi Azra, rector of the state-run Syarif Hidayatullah Institute
of Islamic Studies in South Jakarta. The following is an excerpt of Wednesday's
interview:
Question:
How do you view the current restlessness of politicians, including those
among the Islamic factions that most supported Gus Dur for president?
Answer:
We are seeing a significant increase in the political advocacy of Islamic
movements [factions] which had declined in the beginning of Gus Dur's government.
Now the scale of increased political activism is leaning toward radicalism.
This is partly influenced by the perception that Gus Dur as a Muslim leader
has not fulfilled earlier hopes.
Regarding
their attitudes to Gus Dur, there are three different groups: the first
are the loyalists, mostly within Nahdlatul Ulama (the country's largest
Islamic organization formerly led by Gus Dur) and the National Awakening
Party (PKB, founded by Gus Dur).
The
second group are those who used to support Gus Dur, mostly within the so-called
axis force of Islamic factions. They see that Gus Dur still serves their
interest but that he must be watched very closely. They have no alternative
to Gus Dur; if he were to be replaced then [Vice President] Megawati Soekarnoputri
would take his place. They're not ready to accept her, more because of
her secular nationalist label and incapability, rather than because she's
a woman.
Among
those with such guarded optimism are modernists such as the Crescent Star
Party (PBB) and the Indonesian Committee for World Moslems Solidarity (KISDI).
But we are also seeing beginnings of a dialog between elements of this
group towards Megawati's camp.
What
are the indications? For instance the beginnings of a dialog between the
United Development Party (PPP) and the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle
(which Megawati chairs), which also involves Golkar.
To
continue, the third group are the hardliners who are beginning to be explicitly
anti-Gus Dur, including movements such as the Laskar Jihad (Jihad Force)
and others. Such groups are the extension of the civilian security volunteers
(pamswakarsa) who earlier voiced support for (his predecessor) B.J. Habibie.
They were disappointed with Gus Dur becoming president right from the beginning.
Earlier they couldn't be explicit about their disappointment because everyone
seemed to be supporting Gus Dur.
In
the midst of efforts to build a civil society, why are such groups so willing
to ally with military members?
They
acknowledge at least individual support of some military and police officers.
To liberal Muslims such alliances are indeed incompatible and unfeasible
with "democracy" or "civil rights." But in the "Islamic agenda" [adopted
by hardliners], strong governance is needed to uphold Islamic values and
achieve Islamic sovereignty. The military comes into use here.
In
the classic political paradigm of such groups the civil- military dichotomy
is not an issue ... Indeed this has been widely criticized.
Naturally,
power tends to corrupt ... Does Gus Dur benefit from such divisions?
So
far he has been able to maintain control. But increasing "social illegitimacy"
such as lack of law enforcement, and unsettled issues seen to be hurting
Muslims such as the Maluku violence, could endanger him.
Adding
to these, Gus Dur throws up issues considered to be unfair to Muslims such
as suggesting the lift of the ban on communism. To Muslim liberals this
may be no problem from the view of diverse opinions, but to others it's
totally unacceptable.
Surely
he knows that?
Well
he's playing with fire. Together with the failed economic recovery, such
issues could lead to other groups, such as hardline students, feeling deprived
and as a consequence teaming up against Gus Dur and certain ethnic groups
[as reflected by protests this week supporting the replaced minister of
industry and trade Yusuf Kalla who is from Makassar -- Ed].
It's
similar to the days leading to Soeharto's fall, where we saw marriages
of convenience between groups that hardly ever agreed with each other.
Where
do you think the dialog between PPP and PDI Perjuangan is going?
Alliances
in politics will continued to be formed ... Golkar is being fought for,
for common interests. Nahdlatul Ulama and PKB are talking now about not
only keeping Gus Dur in his seat but retaining him for another term.
Matori
Abdul Djalil (PKB chairman) has said Gus Dur is ready for two terms so
PKB is targeting for more seats. Mere alliances are not enough.
So
predictions are coming true about people turning to Golkar after the polls.
Golkar
here remains the real force ... The elite of the Islamic groupings are
too fragmented ... PDI Perjuangan is also eying Golkar as seen by their
mutual approaches ... while in the past PDI Perjuangan saw Golkar as the
symbol of the status quo. Golkar is also calculating what it might get.
From
the formal political point of view Gus Dur is still safe, suggestions for
a special session [demanding his accountability] was called off but that's
only temporary.
So
dismissing calls for the special session was just a cooling down of things?
Yes,
the agreement gives Gus Dur another chance and he should use it. But the
option for a special session later this year remains open if the country's
condition gets worse. However, Gus Dur is very self-confident and such
people can become authoritarian.
Changing
one minister or the whole cabinet would have the same political repercussion.
It would be better to change the whole cabinet but with transparency and
credibility as the basis ... Now ministers are having a hard time trying
to work while thinking whether they're next.
The
replacement of Kalla with Lt.Gen. Luhut Panjaitan has been widely questioned,
also by foreigners.
The
reportedly cold attitude towards (Minister of Defense) Juwono Sudarsono
by the State Department in his recent visit to Washington shows ... that
the United States is also uncomfortable with the large number of positions
given to the military ...
We
also hear Surjadi Soedirdja [Minister of Home Affairs] will become Coordinating
Minister for Political Affairs and Security. If Gus Dur takes merit into
account his replacement should be [State Minister for Regional Autonomy]
Ryaas Rasyid but if it's one of his people again it could be [State Minister
of the Empowerment of Women] Khofifah Indar Parawansa [a PKB executive].
Is
there a prospect for modernist Muslims coming together with the PBB congress
being held from April 26 to April 30?
In
the context of democratization we need a rationalization of parties. Forty-eight
parties joining elections was too much, leading to nonconducive fragmentation,
and there were a number of other parties who missed the deadline to join
elections, who also claimed to be a revival of Masyumi (once large Islamic
party).
If
PBB could lead the way to reconciliation among such parties it would be
a great contribution to the growth of our democracy. Masyumi is now divided
as represented by parties such as those under Ridwan Saidi and Deliar Noer.
Such
a fragmented elite only leads to group egoism, sacrificing not only the
interest of Muslims but also of the nation, as reflected through the rackets
at the General Elections Commission.
Would
members of that elite want to come together?
They
must find a way to overcome their psychological barriers and differences.
They often come together but only for gestures of decency ... If they agree
that those of the Masyumi movement want to really have a say in the political
process they must unite.
I agree
that their positive side is being critical towards Gus Dur but they waste
all their energy with commenting on his every statement so their programs
and dire need for consolidation are neglected.
Another
strength of the modernists is that historically they have proven to be
more compatible with ideals of building a modern Indonesia; they've been
more capable of working with others as seen by their past cooperation with
the Catholic Party.
And
modernist Muslims have personnel with adequate technocratic skills urgently
needed to address our problems.
Is
Gus Dur trying to keep opponents divided by his controversial measures?
In
any case he has neglected the consequences particularly with the accumulation
of all problems which are perhaps coincidental. If massive teacher and
labor strikes continue this could lead to increasing disruption and radical
movements.
Gus
Dur still has a large opportunity to accommodate [rivals]. They have named
candidates to replace Gus Dur such as Nurcholish Madjid [a noted scholar]
and Adi Sasono [former minister under Habibie government] but are still
constrained by constitutional and acceptability factors.
What
about Yusril Ihza Mahendra, the PBB chairman and one time presidential
candidate?
He
is building his image through a very strategic issue that is everyone's
concern -- judicial reform. In the cabinet, I'd say he's about the only
one with a concept [as Minister of Minister of Law and Legislation].
He's
attempting to straighten out the knot in the courts, move out suspected
judges, and adding new [clean] ones. If Yusril continues like this he'll
gain much credit.
Larger
stakes for Gus Dur behind two sackings
Straits
Times - April 27, 2000
Susan
Sim, Jakarta -- Mr Stanley Fischer, the world's chief economics tutor,
may find out today if he has a student so compliant he wants to give him
all credit for his decisions.
Will
President Abdurrahman Wahid tell his angry legislative chiefs during their
monthly "consultation" that he sacked two economics ministers from their
parties on Monday, and might fire yet more, because the International Monetary
Fund (IMF) said the Cabinet team's disunity was causing the country to
backslide on the reform track?
It
will be a tribute Mr Fischer does not deserve, nor want. For, say IMF sources,
he specifically asked the President not to indulge in his favourite game
of ministerial musical chairs and roil the markets any further.
The
IMF's acting managing director left a meeting with the President on Monday
morning with what he thought was a presidential assurance that there would
be no Cabinet reshuffle for now. So did Gus Dur's personal economics advisers,
who pleaded that he not add to the air of uncertainty. Eight hours later,
the axe fell on State Enterprises Minister Laksamana Sukardi and Trade
Minister Jusuf Kalla.
Was
Gus Dur cocking a snook at teacher, showing him who's boss? After all,
his most important political challenger, People's Consultative Assembly
Speaker Amien Rais, has got people thinking that such stringent foreign
tutelage is unnecessary when Jakarta does not really need the fund's US$400
million so urgently now.
Machismo
aside, by unceremoniously shoving aside one representative each from the
two largest political parties in the land, has he changed the tenuous balance
of power such that his unhappy allies have no choice but make good on their
threatening noises to walk out of his Unity government?
The
short answer is no, for the fractious dynamics of the Indonesian Democratic
Party-Struggle (PDI-P) and Golkar do not favour the two sacked ministers.
Mr
Laksamana might have been among Vice-President Megawati Sukarnoputri's
most loyal advisers and probably the best-liked lobbyist with foreign governments
while she was still in opposition.
But,
his secularist wing of the party is being shut out, reduced to criticising
her lack of leadership, while Ms Megawati's husband shores up her Islamic
credentials with his own Masyumi background and advances to Dr Amien's
Islamic Axis bloc. A month or so ago, the Vice-President might have wrangled
with Gus Dur on his behalf, running interference in the quiet but firm
manner she did for economic czar Kwik Kian Gie and, even ex-military chief
Wiranto, buying them time for a more graceful exit.
But
not this time. He did not consult me, she said sadly when she heard the
news of his sacking on Monday night while enroute to the strife-torn Central
Maluku islands.
The
truth, of course, was that she could have been more pro- active, especially
after the President confronted Mr Laksamana with a demand that he resign
before he left on another whirlwind tour in early April.
Instead,
she told the depressed Laksamana that, while she did not agree with Gus
Dur's decision, he should not fight him. Perhaps, apart from the complex
emotional battle between her husband and her strategists, her own survival
instincts also told her that this was a battle she would not win.
For
Mr Laksamana's Cabinet viability is part of a larger tussle over the President's
long-term political survival, which includes firming up his own patronage
network or risk mass defection in the regions.
Although
he is well-loved as Islamic kyiai and national leader, the concept of electoral
loyalty will remain an alien one among local elites unless he shows them
how their vote is linked to their personal fortunes.
Over
the last fortnight, after Gus Dur accused him privately of backsliding
on the IMF targets for his department, and told him to resign, the former
minister has been telling friends about the pressure being exerted on him
to fill top posts in state enterprises with presidential loyalists.
He
had already lost one skirmish earlier in the year when the government suddenly
grew lukewarm about investigating private sector giant, Texmaco, after
revelations of malfeasance by Mr Laksamana.
Aghast
presidential advisers later told The Straits Times that Texmaco had allegedly
put 150,000 NU members in East Java on its payroll and given NU kyiais
incentive to lobby the President on its behalf.
The
last straw was apparently over Mr Laksamana's failure to secure the term
extension of a senior Telkom official, sources said.
When
he was away in mid-February on a haj pilgrimage with Ms Megawati, Coordinating
Economic Minister Kwik Kian Gie was advised by the former minister's deputy,
Mr Rozy Munir, to ensure the Telkom official kept his job because the President
wished it so. When he demurred, he was summoned by the President and given
the same message.
Yet,
at the Telkom shareholder's meeting on April 7, that official did not win
a term extension. For Mr Laksamana's foes, it would be proof of his continual
defiance of Gus Dur.
Commented
a friend: "Laksamana just didn't play the game. He wouldn't entertain the
NU requests and, when he should have stroked Rozy Munir since he was forced
on his ministry by the President, he alienated him instead." Why Gus Dur
even installed Mr Jusuf Kalla in the first place is puzzling.
Accusing
the trade minister of being involved in the Golden Keys scandal of the
mid-1980s, he began promising his post to Lt-Gen Luhut Panjaitan, the Habibie-appointed
envoy to Singapore, almost immediately.
Mr
Kalla's real utility, it appeared, was to embarrass his nominal sponsor,
Golkar chief and Parliament Speaker Akbar Tandjung, who had given his personal
undertaking that the Bugis businessman was a man of integrity despite the
whiffs of corruption swirling around him, and fanned by Gus Dur himself.
Still,
Mr Akbar stood by him, forbidding him to quit unless proven guilty in a
court of law. But it is doubtful he will go to bat for Mr Kalla now he
is finally out; he is from South Sulawesi, a province controlled by a party
boss who wants to oust Mr Akbar as chief.
He
has no need to strengthen his own opponents, especially since Mr Kalla
has admitted privately he was involved in the Golden Keys scandal, and
his only defence is that former president Suharto ordered him to.
Mr
Abdurrahman, too, has shown time and time again that he has little regard
for the Parliament Speaker, often ignoring him altogether. When Gus Dur
decided to fire Mr Kalla late last month, it was not Mr Akbar's blessings
he sought but, the ageing General Muhammad Jusuf's, a much revered former
Defence Minister from South Sulawesi.
What
Gus Dur did not do on Monday is perhaps more instructive; he left well
alone the ministers endorsed by Islamic Axis leader Amien Rais.
The
two hitherto Islamic leaders, well-known for their decade- long animosity
towards each other, have been inching closer to putting real bite into
their verbal sling-fest.
But
the timing has never seemed right, although the scheming goes on. A ministerial
source told The Straits Times that, in the last two months, Dr Amien and
the five or six ministers from the Islamic Axis parties have met at least
twice to discuss ways to oust the President constitutionally.
One
option they considered was for the Islamic Axis parties to withdraw their
support for Gus Dur on the grounds that he was not only not solving the
economic problems, but also contributing to the malaise with his confusing
statements. Influential in Cabinet appointments, if not in electoral clout,
their sudden rejection of the President would "create a legitimacy crisis",
they reckoned.
Dr
Amien might have credibility problems with most of Jakarta's political
elite, but no one can deny that he worked hard to develop solidarity among
the Muslim parties and hand their votes over to Gus Dur, thereby denying
Ms Megawati victory in October.
The
main stumbling block in this scenario would be Ms Megawati herself. Would
she throw the weight of her party masses behind the President? Would she
side with a failing President against all the Islamic parties, thereby
allowing them to tar her party as anti-Islamic, in cahoots with a President
who is more interested in furthering the interests of non-Muslims at their
expense?
That
element of uncertainty stymied the group, the source said. Plus they realised
it could mean a chance for the Indonesian Defence Force to step into the
political arena, on Gus Dur's side.
The
leading military generals made as much clear when they stomped on suggestions
floated by Dr Amien's group to hold a special impeachment session of the
People's Consultative Assembly.
Stalemate?
Perhaps. Gus Dur and Amien's political futures seem quite inextricably
linked for now. But, mercurial as he is, it would be foolish for any minister
to sleep easy, especially after his promise yesterday to "slim his Cabinet".
Meanwhile,
Indonesia's economic prospects are actually looking cheerful for a change,
recent ministerial inertia notwithstanding. At least there are now two
new ministers fully pumped and eager to prove their President's trust in
their abilities.
As
the ABN-AMRO's latest market report issued on Monday noted optimistically:
"Recent developments, including the Paris Club rescheduling and the IMF's
optimism over reform progress, will provide underlying support for Indonesia's
balance of payments. S&P's downgrade of Indonesia's issuer rating from
CCC+ to D was a technical one, and should be reversed in two to three months.
"Although
political and social risk factors remain a wild card, for investors with
higher risk appetite, we recommend entering long rupiah short dollar positions
on a three-month basis."
Political
pundits might want to continue betting long on Gus Dur's political wiles
and survival instincts too. Just consider why he risked alienating the
market to remove Mr Laksamana so his own man is now in control of the state
enterprises.
If,
as President, you are committed to not treating the conglomerates like
your personal piggy bank, where then is an impoverished grassroots movement,
like NU, that has always depended on your ability to collect handouts,
to get funding from?
How
too can a small party like the Nation Awakening Party (PKB) quickly collect
a sizeable war chest for your re-election in 2004, especially if it is
going to be the first direct presidential election?
The
reality is, money still talks loudest for a people still years from appreciating
the benefits and risks of ballot-box democracy.
President
proves to be wily political tactician
South
China Morning Post - April 26, 2000
Vaudine
England -- The latest phase in the Government's continuing reshuffle signals
a further consolidation of power by President Abdurrahman Wahid.
His
technique is also impressive. He announced Monday's sackings while International
Monetary Fund (IMF) managing director Stanley Fischer was in town, leading
many to assume the fund had demanded the changes.
In
fact, the IMF did not demand these or any other sackings, but sources expressed
wry admiration at Mr Wahid's finesse in letting the IMF take the heat.
"There are underlying politics behind every move Wahid makes," said Kusnanto
Anggoro, a political analyst at the Centre for Strategic and International
Studies.
Mr
Wahid's choice of replacements in his cabinet is a clear sign of his priorities.
Retired lieutenant-general Luhut Panjaitan is loyal -- and bumps up military
representation in the cabinet -- while Rozy Munir is a close personal and
political ally from the President's Nahdlatul Ulama organisation.
"He
wants loyalists around him as his primary consideration is the consolidation
of power. There is no economic reason [for the cabinet changes], everything
is political," said Mr Anggoro.
When
Mr Wahid cobbled together a coalition of Islamic, nationalist and other
political parties to secure the presidency last October, he faced an array
of problems. Mr Wahid's approach was to carefully dole out power to a neatly
balanced mix of political parties, religions and even ethnic groups, in
what was lauded as the "compromise cabinet".
This
year, however, Mr Wahid has openly commented on his dislike for many in
his cabinet and his plans to sack and appoint whoever he wants, while he
first of all dealt with the military by sidelining General Wiranto.
Now,
he is seen to be implementing those plans for reform of a cabinet which
has long been unable to co-ordinate policy goals or implement them. Observers
have been quick to note how many times Mr Wahid has placed close friends
or Nahdlatul Ulama allies around him. "Yes, he wants people from Ulama,"
said Mr Anggoro. "He has often said he trusts no one but close friends
and relatives."
It
is believed Mr Wahid plans more cabinet changes to further insulate him
from his opponents and that these changes would be ahead of August, when
an annual session of the Peoples Consultative Assembly will hear his accountability
speech.
Opinions
vary about whether Mr Wahid's growing confidence is a good sign of growing
cohesion at the top, or a bad sign of his autocratic tendencies. "He has
been an autocrat already," said Mr Anggoro. "If you interpret democracy
as freedom of expression then, yes, Wahid is a democrat. But if you think
it means a Government which is transparent, accountable and so forth, then
he is not."
Anger
over firing of key ministers
Straits
Times - April 26, 2000
Jakarta
-- President Abdurrahman Wahid faced anger among coalition parties within
his already fractious six-month-old government yesterday after he fired
two key financial ministers.
Several
senior politicians raised the prospect of withdrawing their factions from
the Cabinet in protest.
The
Cabinet reshuffle was also greeted by suspicion with few believing it would
make a jot of difference to its stated aim of revitalising faltering economic
reforms.
Mr
Abdurrahman, who is under increasing international pressure to accelerate
reforms to Indonesia's crisis-ridden economy, sacked Trade and Industry
Minister Yusuf Kalla and Investment Minister Laksamana Sukardi on Monday.
A Cabinet
spokesman said the decision was designed to ease tensions and fix poor
coordination among ministers in charge of restructuring the moribund and
corrupt financial system.
The
ministers were fired just hours after the President met Mr Stanley Fischer,
the acting head of the International Monetary Fund, who urged Indonesia
not to waver on a commitment to make painful economic changes.
Officials
within Mr Kalla's Golkar Party and Mr Laksamana's Indonesian Democratic
Party of Struggle, or PDIP, said they regarded the dismissals as an attack
by Mr Abdurrahman on their power within the Cabinet.
President
Abdurrahman, who is backed by his Muslim-dominated Nation Awakening Party,
has replaced the two ministers with Indonesia's ambassador in Singapore
Luhut Panjaitan, a serving army general, and Mr Rozy Munir, a senior bureaucrat
and Aburrahman supporter.
Some
party officials raised the possibility of pulling out of the Cabinet. Golkar's
chairman and Speaker of Parliament Akbar Tanjung told reporters his party
might withdraw support for the government if the President fails to provide
a good explanation for the sackings. "Pulling out of Cabinet is one possibility,"
he said.
Mr
Abdurrahman, who is regarded as a reformer, appointed his Cabinet after
he was elected head of state in October. At that time he admitted the line-up
represented a compromise to accommodate the ambitions of several parties
and the politically powerful military.
Analysts
said a main worry in the reshuffle was the replacement of investment minister
Laksamana Sukardi with a subordinate whose main qualification seems to
be his closeness to Mr Abdurrahman.
That
has triggered charges that Mr Abdurrahman is swelling the ranks of his
inner circles based on old associations rather than skills.
Violence
in Maluku 'political'
Straits
Times - April 27, 2000
Marianne
Kearney, Jakarta -- A Christian religious leader yesterday said the latest
outbreak of violence in the Malukus may not have been accidental, but timed
to coincide with the three- day visit to the region by Vice-President Megawati
Sukarnoputri.
Ms
Megawati arrived in Maluku's capital of Ambon with 10 Cabinet ministers
in tow on Tuesday in a further bid to halt violence between Muslims and
Christians.
"Everytime
Megawati comes, it always happens. It seems to show the conflict has a
more political colour than religious," said Mr Dicky Mailoa, a religious
leader from the Indonesian Council of Churches.
On
Sunday, two days before Ms Megawati's visit, the discovery of a Muslim
man's body caused a riot, killing three Muslims and one Christian man in
central Maluku. Ms Megawati's last visit to Maluku, in February, was also
marred by violence, when a riot broke out on Haruku Island, leaving 25
dead.
Mr
Mailoa said he thought groups were still trying to use the violence for
political purposes. "They try to position themselves as the group with
certain power to decide when the conflict stops," he said.
Another
longtime observer of the Maluku conflict also thought Sunday's violence
may have been manufactured in order to discredit the Vice-President, who
has made some headway in limiting the violence.
"At
least three parties could be trying to step in the way of Ms Megawati and
so try to keep the conflict going," said Mr Tamrin Tomagola, a sociologist
who heads the Reconciliation and Peace Institute.
Both
Mr Tamrin and Mr Mailoa expressed surprise that there should have been
a fresh outbreak of riots as everywhere except North Maluku had become
quiet over the past two months, with Muslim aid workers able to enter areas
controlled exclusively by the Christians or vice versa.
Mr
Tamrin suspected that Sunday's violence may have been created by local
fighters who have become powerful community leaders and made financial
gains from the ongoing conflict.
He
said if this group alone was not to blame for the violence, perhaps either
members of the Central Axis or old guard elements in the Indonesian army
could have encouraged locals to provoke the violence.
Wounds
on one of the people killed on Sunday also suggested that the attack was
intended to incite further violence. "One of the victims was sliced. I
think this was done by the side that wants to destroy the peace process,"
said Mr Abdullah Ely from the Islamic Existence Organisation in Ambon.
Religious
groups and non-government groups report that both Christian and Muslim
leaders have been striving to bring peace to the troubled islands.
Officer
ordered killing wounded in Aceh: Witness
Agence
France-Presse - April 29, 2000 (abridged)
Banda
Aceh -- Three military witnesses on Saturday told a court trying 24 soldiers
charged with massacring 58 civilians in Aceh province last year that an
officer, now declared missing, had ordered the killing of 23 people wounded
in a shooting spree there.
Second
Sergeant Subur told the joint civilian and military court here that 23
people wounded during the shooting of Teungku Bantaqiah, a Muslim leader,
and 57 of his followers in West Aceh last year were taken away by a military
truck.
He
said the 23 were to initially be taken to Takengon, the capital of central
Aceh, for medical treatment. But after several kilometers, Lieutenant Colonel
Sujono ordered one of the defendants, First Lieutenant Trijoko, to take
six of the wounded out of the truck and kill them.
Subur
said none of the wounded ever got to Takengon as all of them were killed
along the way. Two other witnesses gave the same account to the court.
Sujono,
who heads the intelligence department of a military command overseeing
several Aceh districts but not West Aceh, has been missing since November
and has since been declared a military deserter.
Attorney
General Marzuki Darusman was quoted by the Suara Pembaruan daily as saying
he had a report Suyono was seen, accompanied by soldiers, leaving Jakarta's
Sukarno Hatta airport in a car on April 23. Darusman believed there might
be some conspiracy to prevent Sujono from facing the court but he could
not say who was behind the scheme.
Lieutenant
Surya testified he was informed by a follower of Bantaqiah caught by the
military that the group had 100 firearms and 100 followers.
Another
witness, First Lieutenant Indarjo said he was tasked to block the area
during the operation and from a distance of 10 kilometers he heard gunfire.
But
Surya said he was not involved in the raid on the Bantaqiah Muslim boarding
school. The trial resumes on Monday.
No
backing out of peace deal now for Aceh rebels
Straits
Times - April 30, 2000
Susan
Sim, Jakarta -- As leaders of Aceh's armed rebel movement hovered on the
brink of a peace agreement with Jakarta, officials here warned that if
it backed out now, it would find itself isolated.
The
central government is forging ahead with plans to grant local legislative
and community chiefs extensive powers to run the province in return for
abandoning the independence cause.
A law
devolving full powers to Acehnese officials in all areas except foreign
affairs, national defence and fiscal and monetary matters could be in place
by the end of June, State Minister for Regional Autonomy, Prof Ryaas Rasyid,
said yesterday. He told The Sunday Times that, proceeding on negotiations
with rebel leaders in Stockholm and elected officials in Banda Aceh, Jakarta
had obtained from the Acehnese parliament a draft Bill on how they would
like to share power with Jakarta.
Extensive
discussions to ensure the draft has the support of most sections of Acehnese
society is likely to take place by late next month, after the government
submits its Regional Autonomy Bill to Parliament on May 7, he added.
Separately,
Human Rights Minister Hasballah Saad on Friday also gave May 7 as the deadline
for a peace deal with the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) leaders, who had met
three times up with Indonesian officials in Geneva recently.
"Everything
has to be done gradually but, God willing, the agreement will be signed
next week before May 7 in Geneva," he said. He did not give details other
than saying that setting up a human-rights tribunal was a key issue.
President
Abdurrahman Wahid, originally scheduled to visit Aceh today, is now expected
to go to the western-most province on May 8, fuelling speculation that
he will personally announce a ceasefire.
But
even if the GAM deal falls through, Jakarta is still committed to granting
Aceh wide-ranging autonomy beyond that being contemplated for the other
provinces. Only Irian Jaya will get the same special status, Prof Ryaas
said, adding:
"GAM
is just one element among others in Aceh. If the other groups agree to
special autonomy, then it will be left behind. The situation in Aceh has
changed because people are more realistic now and know that the government
will never agree to independence."
Giving
meat to the idea of special status, Acehnese legislators, he revealed,
are demanding not just the right to control the usual public services,
but also a provincial police force, the courts, all revenues from provincial
resources, and foreign trade relations, ceding control to Jakarta only
functions like foreign diplomacy, national security, and currency and monetary
policy.
Prof
Ryaas' own regional autonomy bill, to be presented to Cabinet on Wednesday,
reserves to the Centre exclusive control over five areas -- foreign relations,
national defence, the judiciary, religious practices, and financial policy,
including setting revenue-sharing norms with the provinces.
To
demonstrate its sincerity to the Acehnese in atoning for the decades of
abuse and neglect and end the separatist drive, Jakarta is prepared to
accede to most of their demands.
But
Prof Ryaas warned that Jakarta was unlikely to give up full control of
all revenues from natural resources, and while it understood their desire
to cement their historical ties to Malaysia and the Middle East by establishing
direct economic relations, it would want to retain some control here.
"Once
we agree on a special autonomy draft, then it is up to the Aceh Parliament
to persuade Acehnese that it is the best arrangement."
Doubts
cloud Aceh military trial
Jakarta
Post - April 28, 2000
Yogyakarta
-- Skepticism persists about the trial of 24 soldiers and a civilian charged
in a mass killing in Aceh last year as violence continued in the strife-torn
province on Thursday.
Member
of the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (Kontras)
Munir said the joint military-civilian tribunal now under way was aimed
at placating the public while shielding the real offenders from prosecution.
He
said the disappearance of key suspect Lt. Col. Sudjono was a proof. "The
trial will not touch government officials and military top brass who should
be held responsible for human rights abuses in Aceh." He said Sudjono's
disappearance was irregular and the commission obtained information it
was politically orchestrated.
Munir
said several eyewitnesses reported to the commission that they saw Sudjono
at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in Jakarta on March 22, probably
heading to Denpasar, Bali. "Our witnesses even wrote down the license plate
number of the car that took Sudjono to the airport," Munir said. In Aceh,
protests marred the preparations for President Abdurrahman Wahid's visit
to Langsa, East Aceh, on Sunday. Dozens of student activists rallied at
the East Aceh legislature, demanding Abdurrahman hold a referendum with
the option for independence.
"We
want to remind Abdurrahman that the Acehnese only want a referendum to
decide the future of this province," Iskandar S.Y of Samudera University
said. "He can pray anywhere he wants because the matter of Aceh actually
can be solved from Jakarta," another activist said.
Abdurrahman
has ruled out submitting to the demand for independence and repeatedly
expressed guarded optimism of a quick resolution of the discord. East Aceh
Police chief Lt. Col. Abdullah Hayati said on Thursday that more than 820
police and military personnel were deployed for the President's visit.
Meanwhile
in the provincial capital Banda Aceh, a group of 25 protesters marched
to the gubernatorial office on Thursday morning, demanding a thorough investigation
into the killing of at least 60 civilians in Simpang KKA in North Aceh
on May 3 last year.
Separately,
head of the National Family Planning Board in Aceh Risman Musa revealed
that arson and bombing of its three buildings caused total losses of Rp
6.5 billion. A wave of arson and bombings have hit Aceh in the past few
weeks, targeting government offices, schools and security posts.
In
the latest attacks, a gang of gunmen set on fire the assistant regent's
office in Mabaro, eight kilometers east of Banda Aceh, early on Thursday,
spokesman for the Sadar Rencong antirebel operation Col. Safri D.M. said.
Late on Wednesday, an explosion rocked the Darussalam Police post in Lambaro
Angan, 12 kilometers east of Banda Aceh. In West Aceh, two junior high
schools were set ablaze by an armed gang. No fatalities were reported in
the incidents.
Critics
doubt if Aceh trial will be free and fair
Straits
Times - April 24, 2000
Marianne
Kearney, Jakarta -- The long-awaited trial of 24 soldiers charged with
the massacre of 58 civilians in West Aceh last July has been called a show
that will be hampered by its connections to military legal procedures.
Mr
Irianto Subiakto, a human-rights lawyer from Indonesian Legal Aid, said:
"You have to ask if the government is serious or not. It is just a show
for the people to put soldiers on trial and punish the boys." Lawyers are
concerned the hybrid trial, which uses both civilian and military judges,
will not satisfy the Acehnese people's demand for justice for the thousands
of human- rights abuses allegedly committed by the military in its campaigns
against separatists over the last decade. The hearing is the first of its
kind.
The
plea-bargain for the defence, made on Saturday, the second day of the hearing,
indicates just how difficult it will be to ensure a fair trial involving
both criminal and military legal procedures. The defence for the soldiers
argued that the shooting of Islamic teacher Teungku Bantaqiah and his followers,
including women and children, was not criminal because the soldiers were
just following orders.
"If
we follow a military paradigm, it is true that these soldiers were just
following orders," said Mr Irianto. "So the question is: To what extent
is the command structure responsible for its subordinates?" Mr Irianto
said that, under Indonesian military law, soldiers had diminished responsibility
if they were following orders.
The
only problem is that Lt-Colonel Sudjono, the most senior defendant in the
case, disappeared last November. He is the officer who could best have
been expected to say who gave the orders to pursue the Islamic leader.
In
the absence of the key witness, if only criminal law was used to prosecute
the accused, the 24 soldiers would be held responsible for the massacre,
while the high-ranking military commanders behind the scenes would not
be tried, Mr Irianto said. Before the trial, the military argued that the
Islamic teacher and his students were Free Aceh rebels, who opened fire
on the troops while they were searching for weapons.
Non-governmental
groups are also angry at what they see as an attempt to make scapegoats
of low-ranking officers. "Where is the justice if only the subordinates
are charged?" asked Mr Muhammad Nazar from the Aceh Referendum Information
Centre.
Mr
Nazar, like many other leaders of non-governmental groups in Aceh, said
the trial should have been held by an international tribunal. "What was
done by the Indonesian military in Aceh was political, not just criminal.
If Indonesian law appreciates human rights, they would not have a connectivas
trial," he said referring to the hybrid nature of the court.
Teacher
land hike in allowance, still short of demand
Jakarta
Post - April 27, 2000
Jakarta
-- The government has agreed to raise teachers' functional allowances by
100 percent, far below various demands made by protesting teachers.
Speaking
after a Cabinet meeting at Bina Graha presidential office on Wednesday,
Minister of National Education Yahya Muhaimin said the figure was the best
the government could do due to financial constraints for the 2000 fiscal
year.
Yahya
said the 100 percent increase in functional allowances for teachers along
with a 30 percent across-the-board salary increase for civil servants had
been endorsed by the House of Representatives (DPR).
Any
changes to the decision should be further discussed with the House, he
noted. "However, the government will continue to seek all possible ways
to improve teachers' welfare," the minister pledged.
President
Abdurrahman Wahid is scheduled to have a consultative meeting with House
leaders on Thursday. House Speaker Akbar Tandjung is expected to raise
the issue during the meeting.
Cabinet
Secretary Marsilam Simajuntak said teachers' demands were thoroughly discussed
during the Cabinet meeting, but the government could not extend itself
further due to serious financial constraints. "We understand fully the
hardship faced by teachers, and we will do everything to help them in improving
their welfare," Marsilam remarked.
Teachers
throughout the country have staged demonstrations demanding higher salaries.
Indonesian Teachers Union (PGRI) secretary-general Sulaiman SB Ismaya told
The Jakarta Post that the government decision violated a previous agreement
on April 17 between PGRI and the minister of education.
"In
the previous agreement the government agreed to give a 300 percent increase
in functional allowances. Of course we expect an explanation," Sulaiman
said, noting that the latest development was disappointing.
A 100
percent increase means teachers will receive between Rp 90,000 (US$11.25)
and Rp 210,000 on top of their basic salary. Indonesia has about 1.7 million
teachers.
Sulaiman
conceded PGRI might review its decision to suspend mass rallies. However
be pledged that even if there were further rallies, they would not disrupt
end-of-term examinations. "We will keep on fighting but will not harm students'
education," he remarked.
The
teachers' demonstrations have continued this week. In Medan, North Sumatra,
a protest was held on Tuesday by the Teachers Communication Forum for Teachers
Struggle (FKPNG).
The
charged that the government was unsympathetic to the teachers' plight.
"If the government cannot treat teachers properly, let teachers become
the president and director general of budgeting," one protester said.
More
teachers threaten to strike, demand salary hike
Jakarta
Post - April 24, 2000
Jakarta
-- Some 1,000 teachers of kindergarten to high school across Jambi staged
a noisy rally in front of the provincial legislative building on Saturday.
They demanded a 300 percent raise in their salaries and 500 percent in
extra allowances.
The
teachers, grouped in the Indonesian Teachers Union (PGRI) and the Forum
of Jambi's Teachers (FGKJ), forced their way into the main plenary hall,
where their representatives were holding a dialogue with local councilors,
Antara reported.
Speaker
of the legislature Nasrun HR Arbain received the representatives led by
PGRI executive Sudirman. During the dialogue, the protesters also demanded
that the government drop the monthly rice distribution and replace it with
a rice stipend. "We asked for a rice stipend with a new price basis of
Rp 2,640 (some 33 US cents) per kilogram instead of the old rice price
of Rp 2,380," Sudirman said.
The
teachers also urged the government to provide them with housing credits
and demanded the removal of the head of PGRI's provincial branch, Yusuf
Madjid, whom they accused of failing to realize their needs. Nasrun pledged
to relay the demands to Jakarta and the local administration.
Secretary
of FGKJ Suardiwan said that the central government should reconsider its
decision to earmark a mere 5.8 percent of the state budget for teachers
salaries and allowances. "Other countries allot much more from their budgets
for their teachers. Malaysia, for instance, used 17 percent of its budget,
and Sweden 35 percent," he said.
Separately,
thousands of teachers in Banyumas regency in Central Java threatened to
strike on National Education Day which falls on May 2, along with their
9,000 colleagues in neighboring regency of Banjarnegara.
Banyumas
regent Aris Setiono urged the teachers to reconsider their plans, saying
that students will be undergoing their final examination in the middle
of May. "I want the teachers to think about their students' preparations
for the final exams," he told journalists on Saturday while visiting Purwokerto.
However,
a teacher of Banyumas confirmed with The Jakarta Post on Sunday that "partial
strikes" have been stealthily underway. "Most teachers in Banyumas have
been holding strikes by arriving in classes without following the schedule,"
Munirwan, a member of the Banyumas Teachers Communication Forum, said.
Police
disperse student demonstrators in Riau
Straits
Times - April 30, 2000
Jakarta
-- Indonesian police fired warning shots and tear gas yesterday to break
up a student demonstration in Pekanbaru during a visit by President Abdurrahman
Wahid to the city in the Sumatran province of Riau.
The
shots and tear gas were fired as the students attempted to break through
the police security cordon around the governor's office, the Antara news
agency said.
Mr
Abdurrahman was in a meeting with local leaders at the governor's office
in Pekanbaru, about 800 km north-west of Jakarta, when hundreds of students
rallied nearby and demanded that police allow them to meet him. The students'
demands to meet the President were rejected. Antara did not say what the
students were protesting about or wanted to discuss.
But
when the students surged forward, security forces responded with teargas
canisters and warning shots. The protesters then dispersed in panic, but
there were no reports of any serious injuries or arrests.
Mr
Abdurrahman was in Pekanbaru for a meeting in the city's main mosque and
another with local officials.
Demands
for greater autonomy for Riau, rich in forestry and natural resources,
are mounting along with calls for the region to manage its own riches.
Other regions have also called for the formation of a separate state.
Indonesia
has faced calls for independence from the resource- rich provinces of Riau,
Aceh and Irian Jaya since last year when East Timor voted in a United Nations-sponsored
referendum to break away from Jakarta's rule.
Moslems
delay spice islands jihad
Reuters
- April 29, 2000
Yogyakarta
-- Radical Indonesian Moslem fighters who have vowed to launch a jihad,
or holy struggle, in the bloodied Moluccas said on Saturday they had been
forced to postpone their departure for the islands.
The
Ahlus-Sunnah Wal Jama'ah Forum, a loose grouping of hardline Moslems, said
they now planned to send fighters to the fabled spice islands in early
May. The group had originally planned to ship 3,000 fighters there this
weekend.
"There
are many obstacles in the port of Surabaya with police carrying out sweeping
operations and checks against people going to the Moluccas," Ayip Syafruddin,
leader of the forum, told reporters in the city of Yogyakarta in central
Java. A rally planned by the Forum in the city on Saturday had also been
cancelled, Syafruddin said.
Police
in Surabaya, Indonesia's second port and gateway to the scattered eastern
half of the country's archipelago, have said they would not allow the Moslem
fighters to leave for the Moluccas.
On
Wednesday, East Java police arrested three members of the forum at the
port but were forced release them the next day when hundreds of hardline
Moslems stormed the police offices.
Syafruddin
insisted the fighters were going to the Moluccas to help defend Moslems
rather than to wage war against Christians. "We promise not to wage war,"
Syafruddin said, adding that his fighters would not carry any arms.
The
forum trained thousands of fighters, armed with swords and sticks, at a
heavily-guarded camp near the capital of Jakarta for several weeks. The
group says a jihad is a mission to help other Moslems, and does not necessarily
involve war.
The
Moluccas, a group of small islands around 2,300 km east of Jakarta, have
been ravaged by violence between Christians and Moslems since early 1999.
Human rights groups say thousands of people have died.
Many
fear the arrival of thousands of angry Moslems would reignite Christian-Moslem
tensions to fuel violence on the islands which may spread to other parts
of the Indonesia's diverse archipelago.
Seven
people died in two days of fighting that broke out on Wednesday after a
peace visit by Vice-President Megawati Sukarnoputri, who has been charged
with ending the conflict, local officials in the provincial capital of
Ambon told Reuters on Friday.
Inching
out of the abyss
Straits
Times - April 28, 2000
Two
years after the regional financial upheaval, the Indonesian economy is
slowly regaining its footing. But the recovery is tentative and many painful
tasks lie ahead. In the first of a two-part special report, The Straits
Times looks at the controversial issue of fuel and food subsidies and the
millions more who are still mired in poverty.
Marianne
Kearney, Jakarta -- Mr Kaslim, a part-time becak driver and farmer, has
just started to feel the effects of Indonesia's economic upturn. Two years
ago his half-day of becak driving around Cijulang, a small rural town in
West Java, earned him only 8,000 rupiah to 10,000 rupiah (S$1.70 to S$2)
a day.
At
the time, the cost of staple foods had more than doubled and his earnings
were not enough to feed his family of six. He was lucky because at least
he did not have to pay exorbitant prices for rice, and any extra rice he
harvested could be traded for other food items such as eggs or chicken.
Now,
however, he does not have to barter trade his rice. The becak business
is picking up -- in the last six months he has earned almost twice as much
as two years ago and the cost of some daily necessities, such as cooking
oil and noodles, has come down.
Although
he is still struggling to pay his sons' school fees, his monthly earnings
from driving a becak are still more than that of a local school teacher.
Government
employees are also seeing a small rise in their salaries, although the
increases go mainly towards paying for daily necessities.
Ms
Titik, who works in a government human-resources department in central
Sumatra, says her wage increase from 300,000 rupiah to 400,000 rupiah a
month early last year was still mostly spent on food.
Although
her monthly salary is higher than that of a teacher in Java (165,000 rupiah),
Ms Titik says the cost of food in Sumatra is higher than in Java, and so
her family has cut down on luxuries such as meat and cigarettes. This month,
however, employees such as Ms Titik will receive a wage rise of 100,000
rupiah.
Other
workers have not been so lucky. While workers in textile factories, furniture-making
or mining have also seen their wages increase in the last year, feeding
a family on these wages would still be difficult. A typical factory worker
in Jakarta now earns about 280,000 rupiah a month whereas in 1998 the monthly
pay was about 230,000 rupiah.
Mr
Kaslim and Ms Titik, like millions of other Indonesians, have seen their
living standards improve at least a little over the last six months as
the cost of basic foods stabilised, their wages rose and the Indonesian
currency settled in at around 8,000 rupiah to US$1.
The
figures, though modest, are a huge turnaround from mid-1998, when the rupiah
hit a low of 15,000 to US$1 and the prices of staples shot up 120 per cent,
raising the threat of food riots and mass starvation.
United
Nations economist Iyanatul Islam estimates that in the last year about
15 million of the 92 million who were living below the poverty line in
1998, have successfully climbed above the mark. The government Department
of Statistics, however, claims a far bigger figure of almost 40 million
people.
The
government has achieved this more positive picture of declining poverty
levels mainly by setting minimal living standards for the poor at a lower
level than that of Mr Iyanatul. The government says that there are now
38 million people living in poverty against Mr Iyanatul's 70-odd million.
Now,
as many Indonesians see a modest improvement in the standard of living,
the government is pushing through a number of controversial price increases,
aimed at creating more efficient local industries as part of its agreement
with the International Monetary Fund.
The
most controversial of these is the fuel-price hike. Back in May 1998 when
the then Suharto government raised fuel prices by 70 per cent, riots erupted
all over the country, contributing to his eventual downfall.
Earlier
this month, students again threatened to mobilise themselves for massive
demonstrations if the government went ahead with the proposed hikes.
The
government backed down but critics say that it should not have because
the main beneficiaries of the current fuel subsidies are mainly the well-off.
"It's
a problem of political communication. Why don't the ministers explain to
the people that if we delay the hikes too long we will pay more," says
Mr Johannes Kristiadi from the Centre for Strategic Studies.
The
fuel subsidies, say economists such as Mr Iyanatul, consume billions of
dollars of government money and end up helping the middle class and upper
class run their cars and factories cheaply while basic services such as
health and education starve for funds.
The
daily expenditures for rural people such Mr Kaslim, who does not own a
motorbike, and uses public transport occasionally, will only be affected
marginally by the price hikes.
People
living in the cities will be more affected, says Mr Iyanatul, with the
cost of goods rising slightly. The main effect on urban dwellers will be
the rising cost of public transport. Economists say these hikes are fair
as public-transport costs have not risen over the last two years and will
need to rise in order to keep those companies in business.
The
cost of electricity has also been kept low artificially, costing the government
millions of dollars in subsidies, while major companies and the middle
and upper class reap the benefits, they say. The recently introduced electricity
hike of 30 per cent will not be passed on to the poor who consume only
small amounts of electricity.
But
one of the most contentious subsidies, that many economists argue could
definitely swell the ranks of the poor, is that for local rice farmers.
Although the government has so far resisted pressure to remove tariffs
on cheaper overseas rice, it is under pressure to do so.
International
organisations, such as the World Bank, say removing tariffs on imported
rice, by reducing the cost of Indonesia's main staple food, will reduce
poverty levels significantly.
"If
Indonesia wants to support farmers it should do so not through tariffs,
or through subsidies but infrastructure," says Mr Bert Hofman, a senior
World Bank economist.
One
study done by Development Alternatives Incorporated, which is funded partly
by the US Agency for International Development (Usaid), found that the
lower the tariffs, the less poor people there would be; a zero tariff would
bring 14 million people above the poverty line, whereas a 25 per cent tariff
would bring 4 million people above the poverty line.
Mr
H. S. Dillon, an economist from the government's Economic Council rejects
these figures as nonsense. While agreeing that lower rice prices help,
he argues that zero or very low rice tariffs will wipe out farmers who
make up most of the population.
"You
have 80 per cent of the population who has not gone beyond primary school.
Where else will they find employment? They can't enter the high-tech work
force," he says, pointing out that 20 million of Indonesia's 210 million
people are rice farmers.
Thus,
Dr Dillon argues, agricultural subsidies would be the government's most
effective social safety net for keeping Indonesians above the poverty line.
Abolishing the rice tariff, it is argued, would drastically increase the
number of poor people.
One
of the reasons the numbers of those poor jumped so dramatically during
the height of the economic crisis was that so many people were hovering
just above it that even small increases in the cost of basic foods send
millions into poverty.
And
it is these millions, still hovering just above the poverty line, that
the government should be targeting to ensure that they rise above it further,
says Dr Pande Raja Silalahi from the Centre for Strategic Studies.
He
agrees that government policies to curb rampant inflation and stabilise
the rupiah have helped improve average living standards but accuses the
Wahid government of doing nothing to reduce the long-term causes of poverty
or create more jobs. "The government keeping inflation low is a different
story from people living below the poverty line," he said.
The
World Bank too is cautious in its assessments of whether Indonesian standards
of living will continue to see improvement. One of its studies estimates
that as many as half of all Indonesians could still be living very close
to the poverty line, and they have a 50 per cent chance of slipping below
it in the next three years.
How
the poverty line was calculated
Both
the government and the United Nations economist, Mr Iyanatul Islam, arrived
at the poverty line by calculating the cost of 52 standard commodities
which allows a minimum of 2,100 calories per day.
Mr
Iyanatul argues that the government's calculation underestimates the cost
of basic goods in rural areas which, therefore, underestimates the number
of poor in rural areas.
He
says the government's poverty line also underestimates the consumption
of basic non-edible goods such as cooking implements, and believes that
more allowance should be made for the purchase of household items.
(The
difference between the two poverty lines is not much -- government's estimates
the basic income at 77,386 rupiah (S$16) per month while Mr Iyantul sets
it at 97,074 rupiah per month. However because of the low incomes, this
small change adds a large number to the number of poor.)
Other
economists have also challenged the Indonesian government's estimates of
the costs of goods, concluding that poverty levels before and after the
crisis were a lot higher.
Jakarta's
middle class tighten belt
Straits
Times - April 29, 2000
In
the first part of our special report on the Indonesian economy yesterday,
we looked at the controversial issue of fuel and food subsidies and the
millions of Indonesians who are still mired in poverty
While
Indonesia's middle class do not have to worry about their next meal, many
of them are still going easy on imported goods and luxuries.
In
the second of a two-part special report, The Straits Times looks at the
wary mood that is still pervasive two years after the economic crisis.
Robert
Go, Jakarta -- Locally-made margarine instead of foreign, fewer holidays
abroad and, sometimes, cutting out visits to the doctor altogether. Two
years after the economic crunch, Indonesia's middle class are still having
to keep a wary eye on the family budget.
Crismon
-- the popular shorthand term here for "crisis monetary" -- reined in their
growing consumption of imported goods as the drastic devaluation of the
rupiah put a severe crimp on their purchasing power.
Latest
statistical indices show some price stabilisation or even deflation in
the last two years, but the consumption level of commodities usually associated
with the middle-class lifestyle is still lower than in 1996.
"There
is a noticeable change in spending pattern with people concentrating on
essentials and forgoing items that can be substituted," said Mr Bambang
Sabarudin, head of Consumer Price division at Indonesia's Central Board
of Statistics.
While
none claimed starvation, households interviewed by The Straits Times reported
having to spend more but getting less in terms of quality and quantity.
"Things
that we cannot substitute we still buy, but for extra items, we try to
hold back or spend money on cheaper alternatives," said Mrs Lusi, a housewife
from Surabaya. Explaining her budgeting practices, she said that before
the crisis she bought imported Australian margarine, but the domestic Blue
Band has become her family's current brand of choice.
American-made
Mazola cooking oil, which cost approximately 17,000 rupiah (S$3.60) in
1996 but rose to over 35,000 rupiah, is substituted with Sunrise, priced
at 22,000 rupiah at her local supermarket.
Mrs
Lusi considers herself middle class. Her husband works for a foreign manufacturing
company. Their monthly family budget before 1997 was approximately two
million rupiah, but has since ballooned to reach 3.5 million rupiah.
Other
means of cutting cost for the middle class include reducing spending on
clothing, jewellery, property and luxury cars. Some families say they have
cancelled foreign travel plans and vacationed at destinations within Indonesia.
Some
even cut back on health care, choosing to see local dukuns or traditional
healers instead of consulting a doctor. "People report to us that they
had to choose alternative treatment such as going to unlicensed traditional
health practitioners or taking traditional potions to treat their illnesses,"
said Mrs Indah Suksmaningsih from the consumer group YLKI.
Patronage
of restaurants, another important gauge for middle- class consumption,
also dropped significantly, even at popular, medium-priced establishments
located in middle-class neighbourhoods. "We had 30 per cent fewer customers
up until a few months ago, when things started to get better," said a worker
at Twilight Cafe, one of Jakarta's popular eateries.
Ms
Irene, a recent college graduate living in Jakarta, described her favourite
hangout spot, the food court at Taman Anggrek shopping centre, as a convenient
place that offers variety at a low price.
She
admitted frequenting the noodle stall with her friends before they went
shopping. "We still go to places like Pizza Hut ... but we spend half the
money by going to regular stalls at the food court," she said.
If
the middle class exercised firmer hands on the purse strings when purchasing
daily necessities, they also practised delayed gratification in making
larger spending decisions such as on travel and cars.
Some
families said they had cancelled foreign vacations because of a higher
tax charged by the Indonesian immigration authorities on citizens travelling
abroad as well as pricier airfare and accommodation costs.
Ms
Regina, a medical student at one of Jakarta's leading universities, said:
"We planned to spend Christmas 1998 in Sydney, Australia, but then decided
it was too expensive."
Her
family ended up spending a week at the Hard Rock Beach Club in Kuta, one
of the poshest resorts in Bali. They were not too disappointed, she said,
because they still got to spend the holidays together.
Saleswoman
Yuli, who works at one of Toyota's dealerships in Jakarta, confirmed that
the car market slumped as prices increased. Priced at 45 million rupiah
in 1997, the Kijang, Indonesia's most popular car model, is now being sold
at over 130 million rupiah. "People still came in to look at the new models,
but they were just looking," she said.
Business
is picking up, however, at least for the first part of this year. Toyota's
head marketing office recorded a national total of 29,086 units sold during
the first three months of 2000, compared to 22,877 for the same period
last year.
That
middle-class membership definitions change from one person to the next
presents a big problem for those trying to address the issue.
Mr
Frans Bararualo, an economist at Atma Jaya Catholic University in Jakarta,
said: "We can't describe an average living standard in Indonesia since
each province differs in characteristics and costs from the others."
But
Mr Hajadi, Ciputra Group's Managing Director, defines Indonesia's middle
class as white-collar professionals earning above 3 million rupiah a month.
He
believes confidence is returning to the domestic market, especially since
the election of President Abdurrahman Wahid last October.
Wahid
proposes three-way talks
South
China Morning Post - April 29, 2000
Vaudine
England, Jakarta -- In a surprise move, Indonesian President Abdurrahman
Wahid yesterday proposed a meeting with Australian Prime Minister John
Howard and East Timorese leader Xanana Gusmao to help repair strained relationships.
Steps
toward the three-party meeting also illustrate the potential significance
of a location -- such as East Timor -- on the East Asian geopolitical map.
Mr
Wahid's proposal comes after he indefinitely postponed a planned visit
to Australia, which Australian commentators saw as a calculated snub prompted
by widespread anger at Canberra's role in leading international troops
into East Timor last year.
"I
would like the three countries to co-operate for our mutual benefit and
interests," Mr Wahid said yesterday after holding talks with Mr Gusmao
in Jakarta.
Mr
Wahid wants to meet his two counterparts in West Timor, East Timor or Australia
on his way home from Canberra, but did not say when that visit would be.
Alleged
spying by Australian soldiers and Indonesian claims -- denied by Australia
-- about so-called "spy" flights into Indonesian airspace by Australian
planes, have helped further delay the trip.
But
Mr Gusmao has maintained good relations both with Australia and Indonesia,
and may well be an agent of gradual rapprochement between his two largest
neighbours.
Mr
Gusmao supports Mr Wahid's plan for a summit meeting of the three leaders
and would urge Mr Howard to take part. Mr Gusmao, who has often praised
Australian intervention in East Timor, is due to hold talks with Mr Howard
in Canberra next week.
Mr
Howard, meanwhile, predicted this week that relations with Indonesia might
never be fully repaired. In turn, Mr Wahid has criticised Australian policy
on Jakarta as "childish".
In
the longer term, the desire of East Timor's leadership to play an active
diplomatic role in safeguarding its future independence brings into focus
the likely competing demands for influence on the territory. One school
of thought among diplomats and analysts on the issue of security holds
that East Timor is strategically insignificant, and the only priority is
for Indonesia -- a major regional power -- to feel comfortable with an
independent East Timor in its waters.
"We
have neither the resources nor the ambition to expand our strategic reach,"
Australian Ambassador to Indonesia John McCarthy said at the height of
Indonesian anger over Australia's leadership of international intervention
in East Timor.
Others
say East Timor is the hinge on an Asian axis, between the interests and
territorial ambitions of China to the north and those of Australia, an
ally of the United States, in the south.
East
Timor's independence leaders, Mr Gusmao and Jose Ramos Horta, have often
said they aim to be independent and unambitious in the diplomatic arena.
They have been in touch with the South Pacific Forum and the Association
of South East Asian Nations (Asean) about future membership.
At
the same time, they have told the Chinese leadership they want to establish
diplomatic ties with China. "East Timor places great importance on China's
important role in international and regional affairs, and hopes to establish
and develop normal relations with China as soon as possible," Mr Gusmao
said in January.
Yusril
owns up to taking billion Rupiah from Habibie
Jakarta
Post - April 29, 2000
Jakarta
-- Crescent Star Party (PBB) chairman Yusril Ihza Mahendra acknowledged
on Friday accepting Rp 1 billion from then president B.J. Habibie to help
finance the newly established party prior to the 1999 general election.
Yusril
said his party received a total of Rp 2.9 billion in financial assistance
-- including Rp 1.57 billion in donations from supporters and the Rp 1
billion from Habibie -- since its founding in July 1998.
"All
the funds were used to finance the party's programs, especially during
the 1999 general election," he said in his accountability speech at the
party's congress here on Friday.
An
unabashed Yusril, who is the minister of law and legislation, defended
the action. He said Habibie's contribution was not illegal because it was
donated prior to the implementation of the 1999 law on political parties
which regulates campaign contributions.
"Please,
give me evidence that the financial assistance was against the law. I'm
ready to undergo a police investigation into it," he said. "Besides, many
other parties received funds from the former president too." He did not
identify the parties. Yusril denied last year allegations he received some
Rp 1.5 billion in campaign funding from Habibie.
The
issue of the contribution is among the fissures which have divided the
party congress. Yusril is expected to be reelected chairman when the congress
closes on Sunday as 13 of the 28 provincial chapters declared acceptance
of his accountability speech and supported his leadership.
The
internal discord came to a head on Friday when 16 of the party's outgoing
officials walked out of the congress. Kholil Ridwan, the party's outgoing
deputy chairman, accused some party figures of political engineering for
the sake of personal interests.
"We
see a number of uninvited participants disturbing the congress. Each time
we enter the congress we are harassed and terrorized for not supporting
the reelection of the outgoing chairman." Kholil said he and the 15 other
officials would boycott the congress if the "uninvited participants" were
not expelled.
Fadli
Zon, another outgoing deputy chairman, said the officials' rejected Yusril's
accountability of his leadership. "Over the last year, Yusril and the outgoing
secretary-general [M.S. Ka'ban] led the party with an iron fist and both
failed to solve internal conflicts among the outgoing executive board."
Fadli urged the police to investigate Yusril's alleged involvement in money
politics.
"The
party received donations, including the one from Habibie, but they were
never disclosed in party meetings," he said. "He [Yusril] was involved
in money politics because the donation was received in the middle of February
1999 while the law on political parties took effect on February 1, 1999."
Achmad Sumargono, chairman of the PBB faction at the House of Representatives,
acknowledged the outgoing executive board was not consulted by Yusril before
presenting the accountability speech. Achmad said he disagreed with many
parts of Yusril's speech.
Still
no light at end of tunnel for Jakarta's poor
Straits
Times - April 28, 2000
Marianne
Kearney, Jakarta -- Meeting 60-year-old Daruna as she chews betel nut in
front of the piles of rubbish that are her main source of income, it is
hard to see any evidence of Indonesia's economic upturn.
In
slums such as Kelapa Gading, where the lower rung of the poor eke out an
existence literally on top of the rubbish dump, most people cannot afford
three meals a day, and have little chance of being able to soon.
"If
I could not buy this rice then I would not be able to buy it from the market,"
she says, referring to rice she buys through an aid scheme. Before the
aid programme began last December, Daruna, whose husband "flew off and
left her", depended on the sale of home-grown vegetables to raise a small
amount of extra cash.
She
and her neighbours pick through the piles of rubbish, salvaging and selling
what they could for a living.
Through
the World Food Programme, she can buy rice at 1,000 rupiah (23 Singapore
cents) a kg, half the cost of that sold in the markets.
As
rice is one of the major foods for rich and poor alike a 100 per cent discount
in the cost of rice means people like Daruna can now afford to buy some
other foods such as the occasional egg.
While
the figures show that poverty levels are improving, aid groups such as
World Food Programme, which distributes rice to 5.2 million people in Jakarta,
Surabaya and Semarang, say there is little sign of improvement for those
at the very bottom of the poverty line.
They
say their meagre incomes have not kept pace with rises in the cost of foods
such as eggs, which has doubled since the start of the crisis.
Thus
one study from the United Nations estimates that 56 million people would
be struggling to afford three cheap meals a day. "When you are dealing
with the bottom group they are not reached by any improvement in the economy.
They are even worse off than a year ago because they have sold everything
they have," says Mr Philip Clarke, from the World Food Programme.
He
explains that in the first stages of the crisis many families survived
by selling lounges and other pieces of furniture, or borrowing from their
family, but now they have exhausted all these sources of extra revenue.
Rahayisit,
a 30-year-old living in Kelapa Gading says although her husband works as
a road sweeper, their family of five cannot eat properly on his monthly
wage of 150,000 a month. Clutching her nine-month old baby, she says she
often has to buy food on credit from her local warung, or food stall, and
depends on buying discounted rice through an aid programme.
Studies
by the United Nations Development Programme also say that the very poor
became even poorer as a result of the crisis two years ago. They say that
the number of people living 80 per cent below the poverty line increased
from 8 million to 22 million.
And
the number of people spending almost all their income on food, an indicator
that there is little money for other necessities, has jumped dramatically.
The
poor health of young children is another disturbing barometer. Unicef estimates
that 40 per cent of children under two years old age are malnourished,
and in rural Java, some children have begun developing diseases usually
seen in famine- ridden Africa.
Aid
workers and the United Nations reports say that while emergency programmes
such as the sale of subsidised rice and scholarship schemes helped soften
the impact of rising costs, the government still has not considered how
to help the long-term poor, particularly the very poor.
"The
government still has no food security programme, food production policy
and no pricing system to convince the market to sell to the government,"
says Mr Clarke, who predicts that the very poor will need assistance for
at least another year.
The
crisis has accentuated not only the rich/poor divide but also the rural/urban
divide, creating almost three times as many extremely poor people in rural
areas.
Part
of the reason why there are so many poor people in rural areas is that
even before the crisis there were far more poor people in the country,
with many people teetering just above the edge of poverty. Droughts in
1997 and 1998 pushed many poor farmers over the precipice.
Ironically
too, the current bumper harvest of rice as well as imported grains on the
market have hurt rice farmers, who are receiving very low rates for their
crop.
Businessman
reports graft in Supreme Court
Jakarta
Post - April 28, 2000
Jakarta
-- The government-sanctioned National Ombudsman Council received on Thursday
a complaint of corruption in the Supreme Court.
Businessman
Djohan Taniwidjaya lodged a complaint with the council alleging a substitute
registrar at the Supreme Court in August 1999 had asked him for a Rp 200
million payoff if he wanted to win his land dispute case. Djohan claimed
the registrar told him the money would be given to several justices.
According
to Djohan, the female registrar gave him a time limit of about one month
to deliver the money, after she returned from visiting her children who
were studying overseas.
However,
he said the offer was later taken back after the other party in the case
made a larger payoff. The registrar then suggested Djohan negotiate a new
price with the justices.
Djohan
claimed he had raised this matter with Supreme Court secretary-general
Pranowo late last year, but had not received a satisfactory response.
Djohan
was received on Thursday by council chairman Antonius Sujata and council
member Teten Masduki, who is also chairman of the Indonesian Corruption
Watch.
"We
will soon establish a special team to examine this report, clarify it with
the Supreme Court and after that submit this matter to the National Police
to take further action," Antonius told journalists at the council's headquarters
in Graha Mustika Ratu, South Jakarta.
The
council, which began its work last month, has received some 300 complaints,
most dealing with land disputes.
Personal
assets prove hard to track, despite global hunt
South
China Morning Post - April 27, 2000
Vaudine
England -- Finding seizable assets in Mr Suharto's own name may prove difficult
for investigators.
During
an official probe in 1998, Mr Suharto said he had 22 billion rupiah (HK$24.2
million) deposited in three private banks and that his personal property
included two houses in Jakarta and five hectares of land.
That
investigation, carried out by the government of Bacharuddin Habibie, a
Suharto protege, was later closed because of a claimed lack of evidence.
Earlier
official and independent investigations have determined that Mr Suharto
owns relatively little, with most of the family's wealth in his children's
names.
"If
the Government were serious about recovering some of that money, then it
should sequester their wealth and property here and abroad," the Jakarta
Post noted in an April 17 editorial.
The
family's presumed wealth ranges up to the US$15 billion quoted in a Time
magazine article, now subject to a legal suit by Mr Suharto. But calculating
the liquid benefits of a lifetime of unrivalled access to government instruments
in the pursuit of riches remains difficult.
Sulawesi
students stage rally, demand independence
Jakarta
Post - April 27, 2000
Makassar
-- Street rallies by disgruntled students protesting the dismissal of Minister
of Industry and Trade Yusuf Kalla here started Wednesday off with a renewed
threat to break away from the republic.
The
students who claimed to represent 45 Makassar University and Indonesian
Muslim University, blocked Jl. Urip Sumohardjo and demanded clarification
on the removal of Kalla, who comes from Makassar.
"We
want the government to be transparent or else we demand a free Sulawesi,"
Rustam, one of the students, said. "The ousting of Kalla could imply the
rejection of the South Sulawesi people from the government and this hurts
us." He acknowledged that the President had the prerogative to sack Kalla
and State Minister of Investment and State Enterprises Laksamana Sukardi.
"But
the way the President dismissed them should not have evoked hatred among
people. We, the Sulawesi people, are ready to break away from the Republic
of Indonesia if our representatives are not treated properly," he said.
Soon
after B.J. Habibie dropped his presidential bid last year, Makassar students
held rowdy demonstrations demanding independence for Sulawesi. Many speculated
that the rallies were orchestrated by South Sulawesi figures living in
Jakarta.
The
clamoring for independence was mitigated when South Sulawesi businessman
Kalla was appointed minister.
South
Sulawesi governor HZB Palaguna and speaker of provincial legislative council
Amin Syam said on Wednesday that they could understand the students' disappointment
over Kalla's dismissal. "We saw no acceptable reasons to axe Kalla, who
is a noted figure in the province," said Palaguna. Amin said that the President
had acted arbitrarily. "Gus Dur should have remained transparent and behind
the scenes," Amin said.
Suharto's
'mafioso errand boy' questioned
South
China Morning Post - April 24, 2000
Vaudine
England, Jakarta -- A man described by his friends as a "likable mafioso"
has been scooped up in recent legal moves against people suspected of attacking
Megawati Sukarnoputri's party headquarters in 1996.
Yorrys
Raweyai, deputy chairman of the Pemuda Pancasila youth organisation, was
taken in for questioning about his alleged role in providing a mob of attackers
to support what were said to be government-backed efforts to unseat Ms
Megawati as head of the Indonesian Democratic Party.
Activists
defending Ms Megawati's office on July 27, 1996, were first besieged then
attacked by mobs. The attacks were thought to have been arranged by senior
military officers as part of attempts by the then president, Suharto, to
destroy Ms Megawati and the reform movement which eventually unseated him.
Mr
Raweyai has now reportedly admitted the Jakarta Military Command ordered
him to mobilise his forces ahead of the July 27 riots of 1996 but denied
that he or his organisation took part in the attack.
That
Mr Raweyai is now falling victim to the crusading zeal of official investigations
into a series of recent traumas in Indonesian politics is an interesting
sign of how those politics are changing.
"When
I was a Golkar member of parliament," recalled one source, in a reference
to Mr Suharto's election-winning machine, "we all knew Yorrys. If you were
going out of town and wanted a mass gathering to greet you wherever you
were going, you just called Yorrys.
"He
was the errand boy. He's a nice guy if you know him but yes, he does earn
his living from mafia-style business." Meanwhile, the sons of the Pemuda
Pancasila chairman, Yapto Soerjosoemarno, have been questioned several
times in connection with at least three murders in recent months.
Accusations
against the youth group paint it as one of several which played important,
albeit shadowy, roles at most key moments in Indonesian history. Such turning
points date back to the independence struggle itself, through the trauma
of 1965-67 and some of Mr Suharto's domestic battles to the East Timor
debacle.
The
legal process against Mr Raweyai and others can be expected to be slow,
but his apprehension is a significant fresh move in the continuing tug-of-war
between old politics and new.
Indonesia's
forests disappearing by the day
Agence
France-Presse - April 28, 2000
Bogor
-- Indonesia's forests are disappearing at a rate of 4,000 hectares a day
and the government appears to be unable to do anything about it, experts
said.
"The
situation is getting worse and we should do something," said Jeffrey Sayer,
director general of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
The
center recently organised a seminar of conservationists, World Bank economists,
logging industry representatives and government agencies in Bogor, southeast
of the capital Jakarta, where the government's apparent inability to curb
illegal logging was a focus of concern.
The
country's massive jungles and rain forests are second only to the Amazon
in terms of area and are home to some of the rarest animals in the world.
Their
exploitation has been an "important contributor to growth" for Indonesia's
struggling economy, according to a World Bank report published at the conference.
But the bank warned: "Its overall outcome, rapid deforestation and highly
inequitable distribution of benefits, is highly unsatisfactory."
It
said the logging was benefiting "the same few conglomerates" and "has subordinated
the traditional rights of indigenous forest dwellers and communities."
This "has resulted in conflict and created one of the most serious social
problems facing Indonesia at present," the report said.
The
annual legal production of logs is 21.4 million cubic metres, in line with
the forests' ability to regenerate, but actual production is more than
three times that at some 77.9 million cubic metres, according to the report.
That's about 1.5 million hectares of forest which disappear every year,
mostly to make way for quick yield palm plantations.
The
felled trees feed demand for wood products, especially paper and plywood.
The mills, built by major companies with the help of international loans
which they either cannot or will not repay, are monitored by the Indonesian
Bank Reconstruction Agency (IBRA).
The
IBRA is in charge of billions of dollars of assets but has come under fire
for being driven by narrow political or commercial interests. Government
and IBRA officials taking part in the conference ruled out closing the
mills for economic and social reasons.
They
face "a very bleak future but there is no consensus on the closing of the
mills," said an economist, adding that the debts of the sector in the IBRA
portfolio amounted to some eight billion dollars. "It is a highly political
debate," he added.
Participants
in the seminar noted the efforts of the new Indonesian administration to
allow for greater indigenous participation in the exploitation of the forest's
riches.
But
they were in agreement that this in itself did not consitute a guarantee
that they would be better protected. "A form of central control is probably
needed," noted the CIFOR's Sayer. "Some form of resource transfer or compensation
may well be needed to induce local communities and regional governments
to retain their forests intact," said the World Bank.
Uma
Lele, one of the authors of the World Bank report, said "there is a major
gap between international expectations of how the tropical forests must
be managed and the expectations of the local communities for their immediate
benefits."
Half
of mangrove forests are destroyed: Observers
Jakarta
Post - April 26, 2000
Jakarta
-- Almost half of the country's mangrove forests have disappeared since
1982, causing land abrasion by the sea and threatening biota living in
that environment, activists said on Tuesday.
In
a discussion on mangrove forests, the program coordinator of the Indonesian
Non-Governmental Organizations Network for Forest Conservation (Skephi)
Ruddy Gustave said there are only 2.4 million hectare of mangrove forests
left today from 4.25 million in 1982.
Mangrove
forests function as natural sea barriers preventing land abrasion by the
sea. Observers reported in October that some isles in Mentawai Islands,
90 kilometers east of West Sumatra's capital Padang, had vanished due to
erosion.
It
happened after thousands of hectares of mangrove forests were damaged following
rampant tourism construction projects and arbitrary slashes by locals for
firewood.
Director
General of Natural Protection and Conservation Harsono said that the destruction
of the mangrove ecosystem was strongly related to, among others, "the uncontrolled
clearing for shrimp and fish ponds." Early this month, 85 percent of approximately
12,000 hectares of mangrove forests in Lampung were reported to have been
severely damaged by locals who used the wood to build traditional hatcheries.
They claimed the forests was nobody's land therefore they were free to
exploit it.
Ruddy
said that the government had allocated 800,000 hectares, mostly in mangrove
forests, for the shrimp hatchery industry. He said about 390,000 hectares
had been used for the purpose. "We can be sure that next year we will see
a further decrease in mangrove forests," Ruddy warned, learning that the
number of big shrimp hatchery companies are increasing. Harsono said that
the country has already enacted Environment Law No. 23/1997 to protect
the mangrove ecosystem. However, Skephi in its statement said that law
enforcement remains unsatisfactory.
Air
Force to receive six new Hawks from UK
Jakarta
Post - April 27, 2000
Jakarta
-- The Indonesian Air Force will receive six new Hawk jet fighters from
the United Kingdom in June. They will be stationed at Supadio Air Base
in Pontianak, West Kalimantan. "We expect the six British-made tactical
attack aircraft will be sent soon. This was the second batch of 40 aircraft
we ordered a couple years ago," the Indonesian Military (TNI) Spokesman
Rear Marshall Graito Usodo told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday.
The
six Hawks were originally scheduled to arrive in September but were delayed
following the crisis in East Timor.
The
European Union placed an arms embargo on Indonesia restricting purchases
to black box instruments such as radar. The embargo was lifted in January.
Indonesia
ordered 40 Hawk-100 aircraft and Hawk-200 aircraft worth around US$120
million in May 1996. Fourteen of the aircraft have been delivered since
April 1999. Earlier in 1993, the country bought 24 Hawk aircraft, the delivery
of which was completed in May 1997.
All
14 Hawk-200's, purchased in the second sale, along with the pending six
aircraft, are stationed with the Elang Khatulistiwa airfleet in West Kalimantan.
The 24 Hawks already delivered from the first purchase are stationed in
Pekanbaru, Riau.
Western
Air Force Operations Commander, Air Rear Marshall Suprihadi, said on Wednesday
that the six new aircraft are expected to arrive in June. Unlike previous
deliveries which were directly flown to Indonesia, Antara reported that
the Hawks would be shipped in containers and assembled upon arrival.
This
type of aircraft is well-known for its swiftness and can be used both as
training and fighting aircraft. The Hawk 200 is a single-seat multi-role
combat plane made by British Aerospace.
It
is usually fitted with a Rolls-Royce Adour Mk 871 engine which can produce
a maximum speed of 1,065 kilometers per hour. It can carry up to 3,000
kilograms in rockets and bombs on seven under- wing external points.
Military
spokesman defends business ventures
Agence
France-Presse - April 26, 2000
Jakarta
-- The spokesman for the Indonesian Armed Forces (TNI) yesterday defended
the military's business ventures, saying it would be impossible to survive
on state funds alone.
If
the current government tried to curb -- or even try to restrict the military
from conducting business -- it would be impossible for the armed forces
to survive on its state-allocated budget, Vice-Air Marshal Graito Usodo
said.
"Suppose
there is a new rule or a tightening of the rules, that we are absolutely
forbidden to do business ... we will never be able to live on that kind
of salary," he said.
Various
military bodies thrived during the Suharto regime after forging links with
Chinese businessmen. The military's past and present business deals with
ethnic Chinese businessmen were dictated by the "situation, needs and opportunity",
he said.
"Doing
business with them is simpler, so don't just see whether they are indigenous
or not since they are indeed the ones with the economic power and money."
ADB
foresees stronger economic growth for 2000
Agence
France-Presse - April 26, 2000
Jakarta
-- The Indonesian economy, battered by two years of financial and economic
crisis, will post growth of four percent in 2000, up from 0.2 percent this
year, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) predicted Wednesday.
In
its annual forecast of economic trends in the region, the Manila-based
ADB said Indonesia's gross domestic product (GDP) will grow four percent
in 2000 and five percent in 2001.
An
economic crisis that hit several Asian countries beginning in mid-1997
slashed Indonesia's economic growth from an annual average of seven percent
to 4.7 percent in 1997. The economy contracted by 13.2 percent in 1998
before growing again by 0.2 percent in 1999.
The
ADB attributed the better growth for the year 2000 and 2001 to "a moderate
rise in investment, increased exports from the non-primary sectors and
strong agricultural production."
However,
the ADB cautioned that the positive estimate hinged on the assumptions
that "political conditions in Indonesia will not deteriorate further and
that the rest of Asia's strong rebound will continue."
The
pace of recovery, it said, will also be constrained by continued liquidity
problems and a massive overhang of corporate debt.
The
ADB also projected a modest inflation rate of 6.0 percent for the year
2000 and of 5.0 percent the following year, after the whopping 58.5 percent
posted in 1998 and 20.5 percent in 1999.
The
bank attributed the economic recovery to the growth of private consumption
as exports remained weak. Exports which had declined by 10.5 percent in
1998, declined by another 7.4 percent in 1999. The bank expected exports
to grow by 8.1 percent in 2000 and by 9.0 percent the following year.
Imports,
which contracted by 30.9 percent in 1998, and by 10.8 percent in 1999 were
expected to grow by 7.5 percent this year and 14 percent next year.
"Despite
the large real depreciation of the rupiah and stronger oil export prices,
exports remained depressed because of problems associated with high corporate
indebtedness and access to credit," the bank said.
The
bank said that although the Indonesian currency will remain vulnerable
to swings in market sentiment, it was expected to remain stable at around
7,000-7,500 to the dollar in 2000.
On
Wednesday, the rupiah broke the 8,000 to the dollar exchange level, last
seen in October, amid political concerns that arose from the abrupt replacement
of two economic ministers.
The
ADB said one major consequence of the crisis has been a sharp rise in public
debt, which by the end of March was expected to have increased to 95 percent
of GDP from only 23 percent at the end of March 1998.
Domestic
public debt now stood at 89 billion dollars compared to 63 billion dollars
in external public debt. The domestic and external debt-service expenditures
made up 41 percent of total current expenditures and 61 percent of total
tax revenues and will drain public resources for the foreseeable future.
The
government, it said, needed vigorous efforts to speed up domestic resource
mobilization, including by accelerating asset sales through privatization.
Timely
price adjustment were also needed to reduce subsidies and full transparency
in the use of public resources as well as a careful programing of external
assitance were also required.
The
devastating impact of the crisis on the banking system points to the need
to developing the capital market as a source of funds.