East
Timor
Government/politics
Aceh/West
Papua
Labour
struggle
Human
rights/law
News
& issues
Environment/health
Arms/armed
forces
Economy
& investment
Troops
fire in the air to halt fighting
Agence
France-Presse - February 20, 2000
Mota'ain
-- Indonesian troops fired in the air yesterday to halt fighting that broke
out among East Timorese refugees and residents at an informal reunion at
this border crossing point between East and West Timor, witnesses said.
No
one was injured in the shooting, which triggered panic among some 13,000
refugees and residents crowded onto a beach in a neutral zone on the border.
But
an AFP photographer said at least four people were hurt by rocks thrown
in the 20-minute brawl, which involved people identified as members of
the pro-Jakarta militia.
"People
were just kind of running in all directions, and during the mayhem some
families got split up," said Christopher Lom, press officer of the International
Office of Migration (IOM), which arranges the reunions.
"TNI
(Indonesian army troops) let off a sustained burst of fire for about 15
seconds," and although they were clearly firing in the air, people dived
into the sand at the sound, fearing they were being shot at.
Mr
Lom, who was on the Indonesian side of the border when the fighting broke
out at 1pm, said he believed the disturbance was premeditated and designed
to disrupt the reunion program.
"Our
feeling is that it was something orchestrated by militia. It was premeditated.
Obviously the militia's intention to disrupt the thing," Mr Lom said. "The
last thing they need is reconciliation. I didn't see what actually triggered
it, we could see pretty big rocks flying through the air through the gate
on the western side."
World
Bank denies funds abuse
South
China Morning Post - February 19, 2000
Vaudine
England, Jakarta -- The World Bank says it knew of allegations concerning
misuse of its money to fund East Timor militias but found no evidence when
it checked the claims last June. Indonesian bureaucrats named in an Australian
television documentary broadcast on Wednesday have, so far, remained silent.
"The
allegations made in the programme are serious -- but they are not new,"
said Mark Baird, country director for the World Bank in Indonesia. "We
heard the same allegations and saw the same documents in June last year.
"We
investigated the allegations immediately -- as did the Government of Indonesia
-- and found no evidence that World Bank funds were used in East Timor
for political campaigning or by the militias," he said.
The
bank's deputy director, Ben Fisher, said on the programme: "My specific
reaction and the reaction of my colleagues in government is that we were
very upset."
The
Dateline documentary showed civil servants finding key documents in the
rubble of their offices in Dili, East Timor, but the bank claims some of
the translations of the documents, referring specifically to World Bank
funds, were false.
"Nor
have we seen any evidence to suggest that the US$500 million disbursed
by the World Bank in June of last year was in any way linked to spending
on government programmes in East Timor," Mr Baird said in Jakarta. He said
the Indonesian Government fund was running a cash surplus for the fiscal
year at the time and "had substantial cash on hand to fund its own programmes
without World Bank support".
However,
the documentary's claim that Indonesian government money was used to fund
the establishment and operations of the militias which wreaked havoc in
East Timor remains unanswered.
In
the programme, Indonesia's then foreign minister, Ali Alatas, denied the
charges. "We ... got to know about this and we stopped it immediately,"
he said.
But
the Finance Ministry official interviewed was emphatic that cheques kept
arriving and that special procedures were ordered to get the money to militia
bosses quickly.
The
ties that bind
Four
Corners (ABC) - Broadcast on February 14, 2000
[Andrew
Fowler reports on the story behind the East Timor crisis and how it plunged
Australian-Indonesian relations to an all-time low.]
Andrew
Fowler: It was a relationship built on Realpolitik. But Realpolitik ended
with the carnage in East Timor. And Australia's 30-year foreign policy
investment with Indonesia was in tatters.
Professor
Des Ball: They fooled themselves.
Andrew
Fowler: There's also the, until now, unexplored death of an Australian
spy in Washington amidst murky evidence of secret Timor intelligence.
On
Four Corners tonight, what was really known about the explosive situation
in East Timor while Australia's foreign policy makers became captive to
the ties that bind.
Towns
devastated. 400,000 people -- half the population -- forced to flee in
terror. Thousands more either dead or missing. The East Timorese had paid
a high price for their decision to vote for independence. There were other
casualties too -- Australia's relationship with Indonesia and the reputations
of those who nurtured it.
Scott
Burchell, International Relations, Deakin University: The analogy is equivalent
to a surgeon, if you like, who sews up his patient on the operating table
with all the instruments still left inside.
I mean,
the surgeon would simply be banned and, you know, would be found guilty
of professional misconduct, and would never get within 10 kilometres of
a surgery again. Well, that's the equivalent in the mistake that the policy
of advice was made to Government on East Timor and Indonesia.
Andrew
Fowler: Just what went wrong with the way Australia handled its biggest
foreign policy crisis since the Vietnam War?
Bob
Lowry, Australian Defence Studies Centre: What we hear from the Prime Minister
and the Foreign Minister, of course, is that they would've done the same
over again. Um -- but, uh -- I would be surprised if the bureaucracy would
take that attitude, because the outcome has shown that the policy didn't
succeed, and they should be really looking to see why.
Andrew
Fowler: Australia's special relationship with Indonesia -- a developing
nation of more than 200 million people -- has been largely driven by fear
-- originally, the fear of Cold War communism spreading down through Asia
in the 1960s. Later, the concern was about stability in the region.
Professor
Des Ball, Strategic Studies, ANU: It's really been a quite critical relationship.
Any security threat to Australia has, in practice, got to either come from
Indonesia or through Indonesia. So -- so long as Indonesia remained stable
and we had good relations with it then our security was almost guaranteed.
Andrew
Fowler: The Foreign Affairs Department's Christmas party last year was
host to some of the key men and women responsible for Australia's national
security. Circulating among the diplomats and ambassadors, the elite of
the Australian Government's Foreign Affairs bureaucracy -- the best and
the brightest. One who used to be among them -- Scott Burchell.
Scott
Burchell: Well, when you're recruited to Foreign Affairs, you are told
immediately that you're the elite of the elite. So you were told if you
actually made it through into the department in a recruitment year that
you were the cream of the cream, and that you, in fact, were there to,
you know, to reach the very lofty heights of bureaucratic and, ultimately,
diplomatic practice.
Andrew
Fowler: In the Foreign Affairs establishment, there's a group of officials
devoted to Australia's most sensitive relationship. They're members of
what's known, unofficially, as the Jakarta Lobby. Leading members are the
Head of Foreign Affairs, Ashton Calvert, and former Ambassador to Indonesia,
Richard Woolcott.
Richard
Woolcott, former ambassador to Indonesia: There is a group of people who
spent a lot of time working on South-East Asia and Indonesia who believe
that the relationship is fundamentally important. Now, I don't think it's
fair to say that the Jakarta Lobby, so-called, are apologists for Indonesia.
That is not the case at all.
Scott
Burchell: The Jakarta Lobby has kept a very tight reign on foreign policy
towards Jakarta and, therefore, by definition, on East Timor. And these
are people who believe that Indonesia was a special case -- had to be handled
very carefully by "experts", in inverted commas, with the right views,
and that the relationship should be preserved and run by this group, rather
than by popular input.
Andrew
Fowler: This is the only known picture of Dili burning during the Indonesian
invasion in 1975. Accepting the East Timor invasion was part of the price
Australia paid for its special relationship with Indonesia.
A policy
was developed to train Indonesian military here in an attempt to professionalise
them and instill more democratic values. A deal was signed to get access
to oil from the Timor Gap. And a security pact negotiated that would take
the pressure off defence spending. It was the art of Realpolitik being
played out.
Ali
Alatas, Indonesian Foreign Minister 1988-99: We determined that we would
do something drastic about that relationship -- namely, to build more substance,
more diversity, to that relations. In the words of Gareth Evans, to put
more "ballast" on the overall relationship, so that East Timor, on which
we differ from time to time, would not loom so disproportionately large
in that relationship anymore.
Gareth
Evans, Foreign Affairs Minister 1988-96: You can shut your minds and turn
away from any kind of direct relationship with people who you are troubled
about, who have a bad track record, or you can try and engage them, embrace
them, and move them towards a better regime of behaviour. That's what the
Australian military guys tried to do.
Professor
Des Ball: I think that there's a, um -- an atmosphere within Foreign Affairs
and within the Department of Defence that they had things under control.
Andrew
Fowler: That sense of control began to break down in 1998. The fall of
President Suharto gave new hope for democracy in Indonesia. But it also
created uncertainties for the Canberra analysts. Would they read the changes
right? One of Australia's most experienced diplomats was Ambassador in
Jakarta.
John
McCarthy, Ambassador to Indonesia: Nobody would suggest that dealing with
Indonesia last year was anything but complicated, and so you have to try
and figure out where decisions are being made, how high up the line, to
what degree the civilians are influencing decisions and so on.
Andrew
Fowler: The information the embassy was unscrambling had to be gathered
from a host of sources. Foreign policy makers in Canberra were hoping the
special relationship would survive. What would unsettle them was any evidence
of the military further destabilising East Timor. But evidence of military
misbehaviour there was already coming from an aid contractor who'd been
recruited as an embassy informant.
Lance
Taudevin, former East Timor aid contractor: When I first arrived there,
I was a protagonist for our line and a protagonist for the Indonesian Government.
Andrew
Fowler: For three years, Lance Taudevin's job of bringing clean water to
remote villages provided him and the embassy in Jakarta with an extraordinary
information network.
John
McCarthy: It's perfectly natural when you have employees in the field and
you visit them, you ask them what is happening around them. I think you
need to know that, partly, in order to make sure that the work that they
are doing is being conducted properly and in the sort of environment that
you want it to be conducted in.
Andrew
Fowler: He was conducting, he was sending back reports -- daily reports
at times -- with very detailed information about military movements.
John
McCarthy: I'm, uh -- not aware of that, but I'm sure that's something that
he's said to you.
You
know, I'm glad to hear that. Thank you.
Lance
Taudevin: What he's saying -- there are three of four villages around here
which were totally destroyed -- including the people.
Reporter:
By the Indonesians?
Lance
Taudevin: Yes.
Andrew
Fowler: Taudevin says his earlier reports on the security situation in
East Timor were welcomed by the embassy. But as the violence increased,
his dispatches on the connections between the militias and the military
met resistance.
Lance
Taudevin: I said that there is a link between the militia -- the whole
program is being orchestrated. ABRI is recruiting, it is training, it is
supporting, it is providing logistical support to the operations of the
militia.
That
the attacks are being done in the presence of or supported by or by the
militia -- that kind of thing. They said, "You cannot be sure of that."
And it was almost as if the directions were that I cannot report that that
was happening.
Andrew
Fowler: Taudevin says the embassy told him to change his reports.
Lance
Taudevin: I would say, "No, if what I'm saying is -- is wrong, what should
I be doing?" And they were saying, "Just tone it down," and you've got
to remember "that what you report has to fit into the big picture." And
I remember that particular conversation very clearly because I responded,
"What big picture?"
Andrew
Fowler: Lance Taudevin says that as long ago as November 1998, when his
reports started revealing the links between the military and the militias
he was called alarmist and told to keep his eye on the big picture -- by
the embassy. What's your response to that?
John
McCarthy: Well, I don't recall that having taken place.
Andrew
Fowler: He says he got a call, at one stage, saying that the Ambassador
-- and that's you -- was very unhappy with what he'd said and what he was
doing, and that he was getting too close to the Timorese people.
John
McCarthy: I don't recall having any exchange about his getting too close
to the Timorese people. I would very much doubt that I had any objection
to any aid expert getting too close to the people. That's what they're
supposed to do.
Andrew
Fowler: An early indication of whether the military was changing in line
with Indonesia's emerging democracy came with a very public withdrawal
of troops from Dili. It was aimed at showing the world that the military
was easing its grip on East Timor. But Intelligence said otherwise.
Lance
Taudevin: 20th August 1998 -- report to Jakarta.
"The
military build-up of late here is horrific. The public posturing of ABRI
is just that -- posturing. Troop withdrawal? No way. Just over 600 left
as part of a normal rotation."
John
McCarthy: There was evidence that some were being withdrawn and others
were being put back. The evidence was conflicting at the time.
Andrew
Fowler: But eyewitnesses didn't provide the only reason for scepticism.
Within hours of the troop withdrawal, Australia's Defence Signals Directorate
intercepted crucial radio messages.
A senior
intelligence and policy official in Canberra told us, "On the day of the
supposed withdrawal, "a number of radio transmissions were picked up "from
the Indonesian naval craft. "They were chatting to each other "about how
the landing craft had just gone around the island "and dropped the troops
off again."
Even
though the radio intercepts revealed Indonesia's subterfuge, the Australian
Government welcomed the troop withdrawal. Information about the intercept
came from a series of intelligence briefings and documents given to Four
Corners. They provide an insight into how Canberra's long-held views on
the special relationship with Indonesia coloured its response to hard intelligence
on a growing crisis.
Professor
Des Ball: I believe that we're now witness to the greatest failures in
Australian defence policy since the 1960s.
Andrew
Fowler: Professor Des Ball is a specialist in military intelligence. He
believes the Government was uncomfortable with what some of its own intelligence
was revealing.
Professor
Des Ball: Raw intelligence reports which suggested growing violence, which
suggested that there were preparations and planning going on between the
Indonesian military and the militia groups and which suggested in fact
that the Indonesian Army at the highest levels were behind some of this
violence was inconsistent with the political position, the policy position,
which the Howard Government was maintaining. And from their point of view,
that intelligence was unwelcome.
Andrew
Fowler: In the months after Suharto fell, Australia continued to confront
an unpredictable situation in Jakarta. The uncertainties were magnified
after Prime Minister John Howard wrote to the new president, B.J. Habibie,
suggesting the East Timorese eventually get a vote on their future. Habibie
circulated the letter to his cabinet colleagues.
Dewi
Fortuna Anwar, former presidential adviser: President Habibie had scribbled
on the cover letter that was sent by Howard this following question.
Isn't
it democratic, isn't it just, isn't it right that if East Timorese after
20 or whatever years, you know, 25 years of being part of Indonesia and
being treated as being a full part of Indonesia, still feel that they cannot
be fully integrated in Indonesia, isn't it fair, isn't it just, etc, that
we should separate in peace?
Ali
Alatas: It was rather drastic and quite radical and it shocked many people.
Andrew
Fowler: Did it shock you?
Ali
Alatas: Well, I was surprised when it came, of course, because, don't forget,
we were the ones, the foreign ministry and I personally were the ones who
proposed this solution of wide- ranging autonomy and a special status for
East Timor as an end solution though, as a compromise solution between
those who wanted independence and those who accepted integration as it
is now with all its faults and we thought we had a better proposal.
Andrew
Fowler: In cabinet, Habibie persuaded a reluctant Alatas to agree.
Dewi
Fortuna Anwar: And then everybody clapped and then the President knocked
on the table, so it was all done very proper. And then he turned around
at the back and because, as you know, cabinet meetings are always recorded,
and he said, "Make sure that it is all recorded and later transcribed "because
this is a very historic decision."
Andrew
Fowler: Habibie's timetable was far faster than Howard had expected. It
set off a flurry of meetings around the world.
A key
figure in the Jakarta Lobby, Australia's Foreign Affairs head, Ashton Calvert,
flew to Washington to meet Stanley Roth, who ran US Foreign policy in South-East
Asia. Roth was pessimistic.
"A
full-scale peacekeeping operation would be an unavoidable aspect to the
transition to independence", he said. "Without it, East Timor is likely
to collapse." Ashton Calvert replied that: "Canberra would be prepared,
if necessary, to send military personnel, but not into a bloodbath. Australia's
preferred approach was designed to avoid a military option by the use of
adept diplomacy."
Alexander
Downer, Foreign Affairs Minister: I very much hope that through appropriate
diplomacy, through also the use of democratic processes, it'll be possible
to get through to the end of the transition without, you know, full scale
violence as you put it.
Andrew
Fowler: But while the Federal Government staked all on diplomacy, Roth
called "Australia's position of keeping peacekeeping at arms length essentially
defeatist".
Professor
Des Ball: The Government through the course of February through to the
middle of the year was arguing with the United States to the affect that
a peacekeeping force at that time was unnecessary and that the Indonesian
Army WERE on top of things and that through our relationship with Indonesia,
we could keep things to the point where any external intervention was unnecessary.
Andrew
Fowler: Despite some US misgivings, the United Nations, with Australia's
backing, accepted Indonesia's assurances that it would keep the peace in
East Timor in the lead-up to the vote. But by now, media reports were emerging
suggesting the military were in fact behind the militias.
Four
Corners filmed this incident in which an independence supporter was shot
dead outside a Dili police barracks.
Australian
intelligence was also making the connection. Australia's Defence Intelligence
Organisation, the DIO, had already reported "the military decision to arm
local militias "has drawn its first blood. As long as the military continues
to contract out some of its security responsibilities, more clashes are
likely."
More
importantly, a few weeks later, another defence intelligence report named
the armed forces chief, General Wiranto. It said Wiranto's views on the
military's involvement with militias were not known, but "he is at least
turning a blind eye."
But
the Australian Foreign Minister, on a course that was difficult to reverse,
defended Wiranto three days later.
Alexander
Downer: If it is happening at all, it certainly isn't official Indonesian
Government policy, it certainly isn't something that's being condoned by
General Wiranto, the head of the armed forces, but there may be some rogue
elements within the armed forces who are providing arms of one kind or
another to pro-integrationists who have been fighting the cause for Indonesia.
Professor
Des Ball: Beyond March, there was further detailed intelligence which came
in through the course of April and May coming from both our external intelligence
service, ASIS, and the Defence Signals Directorate responsible for monitoring
communications, which provided very detailed evidence firstly of particular
working relationships between units of the Indonesian Army and particular
militia elements and militia leaders, but also provided even more direct
and explicit evidence of Wiranto's direct involvement in the arming and
supporting of the militia.
Andrew
Fowler: In April, four months before the poll, the militias killed again.
In the town of Liquica, more than 50 people were slaughtered at a church.
An
intelligence brief circulated at senior levels in the Australian Government
again implicated the Indonesian forces. The military had fired tear gas
into the church and apparently did not intervene when pro-independence
activists were attacked. Downer was again in a difficult position.
Alexander
Downer: They clearly didn't themselves kill people but there is an argument
about whether they did try to stop the fighting or they didn't do enough
to try to stop the fighting and the trouble is it's very hard given we
ourselves had no eyewitnesses there to be able to prove the case either
way.
The
military give one story, others give another story, still others give a
different story again.
Andrew
Fowler: Four days after Downer's interview, the militias attacked this
house in Dili. The people here were refugees fleeing militia violence in
outlying villages. Thirty men, women and children were killed here and
elsewhere in Dili that day. Three days after that, the Australian Government
shifted ground slightly, publicly expressing impatience with the military.
Alexander
Downer: Anybody can see that the Liquica incident and there have been other
incidents as well, simply demonstrate that the Indonesian security forces
don't have the situation sufficiently under control.
Andrew
Fowler: On April 20, Australia's Defence Intelligence Organisation stepped
up its criticism of General Wiranto.
This
document, never made public before, reported "Indonesian military officers
are actively supporting pro-Indonesian militants in East Timor. Wiranto
has failed to restrain these officers."
Less
than a week later in late April, John Howard and senior ministers arrived
in Bali for a hastily convened summit on East Timor. Australian intelligence
reports have made dealing with the Indonesians that much more difficult.
Still, the Prime Minister refrained from publicly criticising Wiranto.
John
Howard, Prime Minister: The President and I discussed the events in Timor
over the past few weeks. I underlined to him the importance of the steps
that had been taken by General Wiranto which I very strongly support --
the commitment made to winding down violence, the commitment made to greater
peace and greater stability within the province of Timor.
Andrew
Fowler: Behind closed doors, the Australian Government was getting jumpy.
In a one-on-one meeting with President Habibie, John Howard proposed a
peacekeeping force, something his government had warned the Americans against
just two months earlier.
Dewi
Fortuna Anwar: John Howard pressed a number of times, and during the Bali
meeting, in fact, asked explicitly, "Can I ask you, President, will you
accept police -- uh -- international keeping force?" And President said,
"You can ask, but the answer is no." And Howard asked again. "You can still
ask, but the answer is still no."
Ali
Alatas: And that was raised actually in a personal meeting before the plenary
meeting.
Andrew
Fowler: How strong was the demand from the Australian Prime Minister?
Ali
Alatas: Not very strong. I didn't have the impression that it was. He raised
it because probably he needed to raise it. He felt that he needed to raise
the question.
Andrew
Fowler: With that rebuff, the Australian Government was locked into Indonesia
maintaining security. Australia was hoping for the best.
But
within days in Macau, at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel, one of East Timor's
most senior militia leaders revealed a military plot to wipe out the independence
movement.
Four
Corners can reveal that he passed his detailed knowledge to one of Australia's
senior intelligence agents. Tomas Goncalves told the chief of the Hong
Kong office of ASIS, Australia's Secret Intelligence Service, the names
of senior Indonesia military behind the plan.
Tomas
Goncalves, former militia leader: The order came from the regional commander,
Adam Damiri, to the East Timor commander and the special force commander,
Yayat Sudrajat -- liquidate all the CNRT, all the pro-independence people,
parents, sons, daughters and grandchildren. Commander Sudrajat promised
a payment of 200,000 rupiah to anyone wanting to serve in the militia.
Andrew
Fowler: Over a series of meetings, Goncalves poured out what he knew about
the plans to destroy the independence movement.
Tomas
Goncalves: On March 26, I went to a meeting run by the East Timor governor.
He said to kill the priests and nuns because it was they who were defending
the people of East Timor.
Andrew
Fowler: Goncalves drew the line at killing priests and nuns and fled the
country. But there was reason to believe his evidence.
Jose
Ramos-Horta, independence campaigner: If you know the background of Tomas
Goncalves, then you'd have to believe him, because you cannot find someone
closer to the Indonesian military for almost 20 years or more than Tomas
Concalves. So he knows the whole situation from the very beginning.
Andrew
Fowler: So, the quality of his intelligence that he passed on would've
been what -- first-grade?
Jose
Ramos-Horta: Yes, I would say first-grade.
Andrew
Fowler: As ASIS reported on the Concalves disclosures, a defence intelligence
organisation document obtained by Four Corners and written three months
before the independence ballot sounded a grim warning.
"Should
the autonomy proposal be rejected convincingly, violence by those supporting
integration is likely as soon as the ballot outcome is known. Indonesia
will seek a quick departure to rid itself of the financial and political
burden. Any deployment of forces is unlikely to be prompt enough to prevent
conflict."
This
was exactly the kind of warning that Stanley Roth had given the Australians
three months before. The Americans remained worried about East Timor in
the lead-up to the vote.
As
the tragedy unfolded in East Timor, a personal and secret tragedy unfolded
in Washington as the US suspected Australia was withholding crucial intelligence.
The
man caught in the middle was Australia's Senior Defence Intelligence Liaison
Officer in Washington. His name -- Merv Jenkins. Australia gives the US
intelligence, but gets far more back in return.
Merv
Jenkins, Four Corners, May 1970: "Honour, loyalty, integrity":
Andrew
Fowler: From his days at Duntroon, Jenkins was described as a brilliant
and dedicated officer, a man contemporaries called a 'patriot'.
Four
Corners Jounalist, 1970: What does honour, for instance, mean for you?
Merv
Jenkins, 1970: Um -- pride within myself, for what I'm doing.
Andrew
Fowler: But questions of honour aren't always simple. It's rare that there's
a large gap between Australia and the US on Asia policy. But one had opened
up over East Timor.
As
Liaison Officer, it was Jenkins's job to keep his American counterparts
informed without compromising his primary loyalty to Australia. During
1998, Jenkins believed he had the authority to pass "Australian Eyes Only"
or "AUSTEO" material to the Americans, with discretion.
A colleague
he'd fallen out with intercepted this material, including three Department
of Foreign Affairs cables, and informed defence bosses back in Canberra.
In May last year, in the midst of the Timor intelligence confusion, Jenkins
received an email from the Defence Intelligence Security Office warning
him about passing intelligence.
But
it was hardly a severe reprimand. It said that "issues are becoming extremely
sensitive as there are foreign policy implications". It didn't tell him
to stop giving information to the Americans, but pointed out, "it is imperative
that extra care is taken with the passing of material to the US and Canada".
Professor
Des Ball: That would've placed him in a very, very uncomfortable position.
On the one hand, uh -- the Americans would've detected immediately that
there had been cuts in the flow. Yet they were continuing to pass to him
really valuable high-level and expensive intelligence.
In
return, he must've thought that he couldn't do anything but, at least unofficially,
let them see material that he had whether it was classified AUSTEO or not,
because in the case of the intelligence liaison arrangements with the Americans,
it's common practice to give them intelligence which is AUSTEO.
Andrew
Fowler: Jenkins would later tell his superiors that: "The pressure on me
to pass on information has been intense and is building."
In
late May, Jenkins attempted to pass further information to American contacts.
We can't be sure of the exact content of any of the documents Jenkins handed
over, but the warning email he got from Defence Intelligence was headlined
"Timor Issues". Australia's former defence secretary confirms the subject
was Timor.
Paul
Barratt, former Defence Secretary: As Secretary of the Department of Defence,
I was responsible for the integrity and security of the system, and I did
not give permission for any Australian Eyes Only documents to be passed
to anybody at any stage.
Andrew
Fowler: Did these documents relate, at least in part, to East Timor?
Paul
Barratt: Uh, I believe so.
Andrew
Fowler: The Defence Intelligence Organisation had warned Merv Jenkins to
take care. But the Foreign Affairs Department had apparently been kept
in the dark about the allegations of unauthorised disclosure of intelligence.
When
it found out, for Merv Jenkins, events suddenly took a turn for the worse.
Foreign Affairs immediately sought a "please explain" from Defence. An
investigation was launched and Jenkins was hauled in for questioning. He
was asked specifically about the East Timor correspondence.
After
the questioning, Jenkins emailed his superior in Canberra. He said he was
"experiencing a range of emotions from frustration to anger to remorse".
He said he'd been "as discreet as possible". Jenkins ended his email with
an apology for the trouble caused and a request to talk in "August '99,
if you are free." But Merv Jenkins would never make the appointment. Two
days later, the man to whom honour meant so much was found hanged in the
garage of his Arlington, Virginia, home.
He'd
left a suicide note. It was his 48th birthday. The Australian Government
was at great pains to emphasise the personal tragedy and avoid speculation
about any political ramifications.
Alexander
Downer: You know, the central point here ... the central point here is
this is a terrible human tragedy. The central point here is that there
is a widow and there are three sons.
Andrew
Fowler: After his death, those who had been investigating Jenkins reported
that he'd broken the rules but he'd not intended to harm Australia's national
interests.
We
may never know exactly why Merv Jenkins took his own life, but it appears
that the Department of Foreign Affairs was edgy about the flow of intelligence
possibly compromising its position on East Timor. There will be an inquiry
into the Merv Jenkins tragedy. The Australian Government wants it to be
secret. The Jenkins family want it to be public.
Enid
Jenkins, mother of Merv Jenkins: I want to be told what happened. What
happened to change him from happily talking to me about coming home in
two or three weeks, taking his family round Canada and coming home, back
to his son in Canberra, back to his dog. I want to know what happened to
make him decide that he had no other course but to take his own life.
Andrew
Fowler: Whatever Merv Jenkins was or was not telling the United States,
by now the flow of information out of East Timor left no room for doubt
about what was happening there.
With
the independence referendum two months away, the United Nations monitors
had arrived, including unarmed Australian Federal Police. They began putting
together a virtual library of evidence establishing the conspiracy between
the military and the militias. One Indonesian military document revealed
a covert plan.
Wayne
Sievers, Federal Police Intelligence Officer: A decision was taken where
the Denrin and the Colpola, that is, the head of the Indonesian military
and the head of the Indonesian police in East Timor would each supply five
intelligence officers to work for the Aitarak.
The
Aitarak -- it means 'thorn' -- were the local militia in the Dili region.
And those five intelligence officers would monitor, initiate and monitor,
on a date to be determined, terrorist attacks on pro-independence supporters
in the Dili region.
Andrew
Fowler: Sievers says he volunteered this evidence to the Australian Consulate
in Dili.
Wayne
Sievers: I offered it to the appropriate people and they had a look at
one document and agreed it was probably genuine and then weren't interested
in collecting the rest of the documents because they said to me, "Yes,
we know all about these kinds of documents." It seemed to be one more headache
for them.
Andrew
Fowler: Three days after the East Timorese voted four to one for independence,
the long-feared carnage started. Prime Minister John Howard moved quickly
to stitch together an international force for East Timor.
John
Howard: What we've seen over the last few weeks, and particularly over
the last week or two, is a significant change in the direction of Australian
foreign policy and the abandonment of a generation of what I might call,
loosely, "acquiescence".
Andrew
Fowler: In an extraordinary about-face, the Australian Government now found
itself closer to Timor liberationists than to Jakarta.
Jose
Ramos-Horta: We will remember John Howard as the man who brought in the
multinational force. And as far as Paul Keating and the others, no resentment,
you know. We harbour no resentment, no anger, no hatred towards anyone.
But
they will be remembered only as the ones who betrayed us all these years.
And still we don't hate them, we don't resent them. They will be part of
history, they will be pushed into the dustbin of history, and John Howard
will be the one who will be remembered.
Andrew
Fowler: But the Foreign Affairs establishment still has much to explain.
Australia's long-term policy objectives have failed.
Indonesia's
soldiers may look the part, but there's little evidence from their behaviour
in East Timor that they've benefited from Australia's assistance to become
a more professional army.
The
celebrated Timor Gap oil deal was frozen by a newly independent East Timor.
And the collapse of a security pact with Indonesia means a complete rethink
of defence spending. Even those who'd invested careers in the special relationship
are left a little rueful.
Gareth
Evans: I, for one, am prepared to acknowledge that I was overconfident
about the Indonesian military's capacity for redemption for a number of
previous years. They've behaved badly over a long period and they behaved
abominably in the present environment.
Ali
Alatas: I was -- as someone who has worked so hard on putting Indonesian-Australian
relations on a strong basis of friendship -- I was very sad. I was very
sad that at the end of my tenure, we were back to square one and that we
were again at loggerheads precisely because of East Timor. And that again
there was this atmosphere of mutual suspicion.
Andrew
Fowler: Australia's special relationship with Indonesia clearly hasn't
paid off. The long-term failures were compounded in the months before the
Timor poll when Australia was blinded to information it was getting through
its extensive intelligence network.
Juwono
Sudarsono, Indonesian Defence Minister: I think it's good technologically.
I don't know whether good in interpreting the data on the ground.
Bob
Lowry: I think one of the major problems was that defence was not brought
in to the diplomatic process earlier in terms of bringing pressure to bear
on the Indonesian military. And then having discovered that that wasn't
sufficient, mobilising external support principally from the Americans
to help with that process.
Professor
Des Ball: I think it comes from the arrogance which pervades a lot of the
senior decision-making circles and national security affairs in Canberra.
I think those who held those views fooled themselves.
Andrew
Fowler: Australia Day at the Ambassador's residence in Jakarta. The job
of building a new relationship with Indonesia is under way. But there's
still great sensitivity.
The
Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, the Defence Minister and the Head
of Foreign Affairs all declined to be interviewed for this program.
While
they've argued that there were conflicting intelligence signals throughout
the Timor crisis, one message came through clearly -- the Indonesian military
couldn't be trusted.
The
Australian Government needs to examine what went wrong if the same mistakes
aren't to be made again. There were, after all, no winners. Not in Canberra,
where the Government relied heavily on its flawed special relationship
with Indonesia. Nor, more importantly, in East Timor where the people might
have their freedom but little else.
Militia
funding traced to government
Dateline
(SBS Television) - February 16, 2000
Mark
Davis -- In a forest West of Dili, Filomena Amaral is about to learn the
details of how her husband, a village schoolteacher and church leader,
was tortured and killed.
Filomena:
"Why was he killed? Was he a thief? Did he steal people's things or did
he kill people like they killed him? No he died without fault."
Photographs
of her husbands shattered bones are needed as evidence in the event that
his killers are ever brought to trial. The forensic team will piece together
the final moments of her husband's life ... but the real evidence concerning
his death isn't buried here; It's buried in filing cabinets, government
memos and bank records . Buried in the minds of elegant men in suits who
incited approved of and paid for this execution and who, it would appear,
are going to get away with murder...
Alatas:
"I don't know what you are talking about, because you are talking about
things as if we are in the business of funding the militias."
Mark:
"Yes, exactly."
Alatas:
"Exactly. Which is not. Which is not. How can I talk about things which
we did not do?"
A suspected
militiamen has been found hiding in a house in Dili. As the crowd grows
it is probably the suspects good fortune that he is arrested but given
the hundreds, possibly thousands of people that were killed here, there
has been remarkably few arrests such as this and all of them have been
relatively minor figures.
There
is now little doubt that if justice were to be served it would be Indonesian
Generals being dragged from their houses today but even their involvement
only tells half of the real story.
The
handiwork of the Indonesian Army is fairly plain to see and their involvement
has been the focus of most inquiries to date. But were Indonesia's generals
acting as rogue elements in East Timor or under orders? Were the war criminals
in the government itself.
So
far, Indonesian intelligence and Military figures have all stuck together
in recounting their version of events in East Timor, but they never dreamt
that this man would turn and give evidence against them.
Thomas
Gonsalves was Indonesia's closest friend in East Timor for 24 years. Gonsalves
was the leader of the pro-Indonesian forces that led the invasion of East
Timor at Balibo in 1975. He is a veteran pro-indonesian soldier, intelligence
figure and politician. When the pro-indonesian militia and intelligence
groups were reactivated in 1998, Thomas accepted the army's invitation
to take a leadership role. He was a natural choice.
Thomas:
"Oh, yes, many times since last year. I attended many meetings. Almost
every week we had meetings."
Mark:
"That was with Suratman?"
At
two preliminary inquiries into Human rights abuses in East Timor Thomas's
evidence has proved devastating to the Indonesian army but in this his
first television interview he implicates not just generals but remarkably
Senior ministers of the Indonesian government.
Thomas:
"I met with four of them. Generals Adam Damiri, Kiki Shyanakri, Amirud
and the Minister for Transmigration, Hendro Priyono. The point they made
was if we continued to defend the white and red flag, they were ready to
provide any funds, and all sorts of guns and all the troops here could
help us."
According
to Thomas and others Hendro Priyono's enthusiasm to create and incite a
militia force was so extreme that he even offered to don camouflage and
fire the guns himself, but in the end he just provided the money for others
to do it.
Thomas:
"We went to his office. That's when he told Governor Abilio's brother,
Chiquito, the chief of the Transmigration Department in Timor, to devote
the whole departmental budget for the use of the militias."
The
implications of a government departments directly diverting money to militias
are enormous -- it exposes ministers to possible criminal prosecution and
the State to massive compensation claims.
And
as I was to learn Transmigration was by no means the only Department to
contribute funds and all of those contributions were recorded in some way
by the bureaucracy
All
the government buildings and most of the documents they contained have
been destroyed by soldiers but the people who wrote those documents, copied
them and filed them are still in Dili. but to date there's been little
interest in finding the local bureaucrats who administered the flow of
money from the government to the militias.
Xanana
Gusmao and his CNRT leadership have been particularly singular in who they
blame for the destruction of their country. The only accusations they make
are against the Indonesian army. Xanana has said little that would implicate
any Indonesian government figures with whom he is trying to reestablish
relation.
Sebastion:
"We need to continue gathering evidence of the violence in East Timor.
Whereas you, the President and CNRT are promoting reconciliation amongst
the East Timorese."
Like
many young people in East Timor, former student leader Sebastion Gutteres
believes that the pursuit of reconciliation, of fence mending with the
Indonesian government is clouding the search for the truth.
Sebastion:
"there is only interest in providing eye witness for the killings. But
for searching for deeper evidence, documents, how they operated, no one
is doing this."
Mark:
"and who was paying them."
Sebastion:
"yeah, who gave the orders, nothing so far has happened on this."
Both
Sebastion and former Independence activist, Jose Apparitio had friends
and relatives killed in the violence last year. They're been looking for
answers of their own and they agree to help me follow the paper and money
trail across Dili.
Sebastion:
"these guys are civil servants, one from finance the other police" or "there
going to get some documents".
The
Department of Finance in Dili was the clearing house for all government
funds that entered East Timor...
This
building was destroyed and looted by Indonesian soldiers but by a stroke
of luck the upper floor didn't catch fire. As head of the budget section
in the Department of Finance Jao Da Silva had intimate access to all departments
in the public service. His job was to oversee and monitor where government
money was going and from this room it was going to the militias.
Jao:
"With regard to the militia, my boss put me in charge of the money. Because
they used to go to the Governor who'd have our boss tell us to get the
money quickly for their activities."
Jao
confirms money from the transmigration department was given to militia
groups. But they weren't the only department to contribute for the "Socialisation
of Autonomy" -- a term which had become open code in the public service
for propaganda and militia activities to ensure the victory of the pro
Indonesian autonomy groups at the upcoming referendum.
Jao:
"All departments must donate. Transmigration, Agriculture, Forestry, all
must give for the "socialisation of autonomy."
The
intimate connections between ministries and the militias began in Jakarta
in February 1999 at a dinner at the home of the Minister for Information,
Yunus Yosfiah. Thomas Gonsalves was there and by coincidence so was I.
Mark
in English: "Was that in Feb? I was there, standing outside!"
Thomas:
"He wouldn't want to see journalists. Yunus said that journalists should
go to his office." At the time of the dinner in February in February 99,
the militias were still a very small and largely unknown group. A handful
of individuals had come to prominence after admitting to the murder and
mutilation of people in remote villages.
In
February I was following one of these killers through Jakarta, expecting
him to be arrested, not to visit the home of a minister. I watched as the
cream of the then tiny militia movement walked into Yunus Yosfiah's home.
Mark:
"So Yunus Yosfia said he would provide you with guns if you needed them?"
Thomas:
"Yes."
Yunus
Yosfiah's connection with guns and East Timor go back some time. In 1975
he was in charge of a front-line Indonesian unit involved in the initial
invasion of East Timor. And it has been alleged that he was the officer
who ordered the execution of five western journalists in the town of Balibo.
According
to Thomas, Yosfiah believed the army in East Timor had become too soft
under the command of Colonel Tono Suratman, an extraordinary proposition
given that dozens of people had been recently shot and mutilated by Suratman's
soldiers and militias. Yosfiah offered to make introductions so the militias
could obtain direct government support.
Thomas:
"In his conversation on preparing the militia he even called Tono Suratman
a coward because he was taking too long to act. We should act now because
we're ready to support you with guns or anything else."
Within
a fortnight of the dinner more than two million Australian dollars arrived
from a source in Jakarta to launch the militias as a formal movement in
every corner of East Timor. The money came through the militias newly formed
political front the FPDK, or the Forum for Unity, Democracy and Justice.
Forced recruitment began immediately. A bunch of obscure thugs now had
the imprimatur of figures in Jakarta and the cash to back it. Thomas Gonsalves
and his colleague Rui Lopez were asked to formally lead the new militia
movement.
Rui
Lopez was another figure with intimate connections with Indonesian military
and intelligence. Although they remained in the network, Thomas and Rui
declined to become the official leaders of the militia even though the
money that was being offered was coming from and impeccable source.
Rui
& Thomas: "What I know is that the first money given out went to the
FPDK. FPDK was the first pro-autonomy organisation. It was set up by the
army but the money came from the Foreign Affairs department from Mr Ali
Alatas because it was Chico Lopes who lobbied for the money together with
Domingos Coli."
Thomas:
"17 Billion Rupiah provided by Ali Alatas for FPDK."
Rui:
"Billions."
According
to Thomas and Rui and another key witness the bagman for the Foreign Affairs
money was Francisco Lopez da Cruz ... the Department's 'Special Envoy to
East Timor' who arrived with a first installment of 9 billion Rupiah.
"Mark:
"Was it your Department Sir?"
Alatas:
"Our department was engaged in diplomacy, in diplomacy abroad, you know
and negotiating with the UN."
Mark:
"Was it your department that gave 9 Billion Rupiah to the FPDK, which was
the main militia umbrella group?"
Alatas:
"No, No, we are not, how do you call it, involved in internal things, you
know."
Mark:
"Cico Lopes Da Cruz -- he is part of your department?"
Alatas:
"He is, he was. Well, he is still perhaps, how do you call it, special
envoy on East Timor, yes."
Mark:
"Lopes da Cruz gave them 9 Billion rupiah. He works for your department
he says it came with your authority."
Alatas:
"Yes but that was not for militia. That was for general information perhaps."
Perhaps
more than anyone else in East Timor, Rui Da Costa knows what the information
campaigns of the FPDK and their militias entailed...
Rui:
"Without any reason they killed two boys here"
As
the militia network expanded across East Timor, Rui risked his own life
to voluntarily investigate and document the deaths of 200 others. Rui's
list contains 200 people who had ignored the political message of the FPDK
and their militias.
And
the distinguishing feature of the killings that occurred before the referendum
was that nearly all them were mutilated as a gruesome warning to others.
This was the most effective education campaign in the first half of 99.
"it
says 'Assassinated by the barbarities of the monstrous militias.' "
Rui:
"They cut his throat and cut out his tongue."
Mark:
"They cut his tongue! Why?"
Rui:
"I don't know why. This is the question."
Highly
placed witnesses in Dili are prepared to testify that the Foreign Affairs
money went directly to the FPDK and their militias. Ali Alatas maintains
that his dept may have contributed to "socialisation teams" -- quasi government
bodies designed to explain the processes of the referendum to the population.
Alatas
Alatas:
"There was money of course for the efforts towards spreading of information,
of information. We agreed there would be a socialisation period, we agreed
with the UN that there would be a socialisation period."
This
is a budget that has been found from one the 'socialisation teams.' Although
it has made every attempt to be relatively discreet it's fairly clear how
this money was spent. It includes wages and uniforms for 150 people, money
for instructors and training Costs for the local Military Commander and
Police Chief for their assistance in explaining the democratic processes.
And grants to the BRTT, a senior pro-integration group with links to the
militias, the FPDK, the forum for Unity Democracy and Justice and specifically
by name the known militia group ABLAI an acronym of "I will fight to preserve
integration". All of them doing there best to explain the electoral system.
As
Ali Alatas began negotiating with the UN over the processes of the referendum,
international attention was starting to focus on the growing terror campaign
in East Timor. A direct connection with his department would have been
terminal for Indonesia's bargaining position. The second installments promised
to the FPDK was canceled.
Adelino
Gutteres: "Alatas ordered it blocked because instead of funding socialisation
the money had gone on the militia and buying guns. The militia had started
killing people. As the situation deteriorated Ali Alatas ordered the next
9 billion stopped. "Don't give them the 9 billion." But militia activities
had begun and now there was no money to pay them."
Adelino
Gutteres worked for the head of the FPDK, Domingos Koli Soares who by March
was having trouble paying his militiamen. But Domingo Koli Soares had excellent
government contacts -- he was also the Bupati or the Mayor of Dili.
Adelino:
"The Bupati ordered me to get the money. He said `whatever you have to
do, just get it.'"
March
was a difficult time to be seeking money from government departments. It
was the end of the Indonesian financial year and they were all broke. To
ease the cash crisis the army provided militia leader Eureka Gutteres with
a suitcase of counterfeit bills. But they were clumsy reproductions, many
with the same serial numbers and the banks, very politely, declined to
accept them.
From
his government office in Dili, the leader of the FPDK cooked up scheme
with the Governor of East Timor and the co-operation of ministries in Jakarta
that would permanently solve the militia's liquidity problems. A scheme
to plunder development and welfare funds that had been established to help
the poor. A scheme where militia murderers could be put on the books as
charity workers. And best of all, of it would be largely paid for by International
donors.
Jao
has found one of the documents he was looking for. It is a memo from the
Governor of East Timor to each of his district heads instructing them to
use their development and welfare budgets for the "socialisation of autonomy".
The kindest interpretation that could be given to this document is that
it was an order to misappropriate funds for referendum propaganda.
But
the Governor was not too coy to make specific reference to payments for
militia and in practice this is exactly what it was for. "They're militia
security guards. Then penggalangan, which means militia activities."
This
document is the blueprint for how the militias would be funded from May
until the final killing spree in September when the Indonesians lost the
referendum. The scheme was delayed because the development and welfare
money hadn't yet arrived from Jakarta but it soon would. Jao was told courtesy
of the World Bank.
The
World Bank, the IMF and the Asia Development Bank had all made huge contributions
to the Indonesian budget but at the exact time of the militia's financial
crisis in March and April, a World Bank loan was the pot of gold that the
Indonesian government was waiting for.
Although
the deal wasn't finalised the money was as good as in the bank for the
bureaucracy in Dili. In fact a loan was taken out against it to keep the
militia machine rolling. The Department of Political Affairs arranged the
loan and Jao's department had to guarantee that they'd repay it out of
the first development and welfare funds to arrive.
Jao:
"Yes because they were waiting for this money to be able to start their
activities. It was delayed. Activities such as the second attack on Santa
Cruz, Quintal Kiik, Bemori, Becora, Comoro ... For instance, Jaqquim was
killed in Becora. All of that was funded by this money."
As
the bureaucracy made the necessary financial arrangements the militias
were preparing themselves for their biggest bloodbath to date. A plan so
chilling that the stakes were becoming too high for Thomas Gonsalves.
Thomas:
"On March 26, the Governor told us that from May 1, throughout the territory,
we were to liquidate all the CNRT members, down to their grandchildren.
If the people sought help from priests, nuns or the bishop, these too should
be killed. That's why I decided to leave."
After
24 years of being East Timor's most prominent integrationist Thomas Gonsalves
had to begun to leak information to independence leader Xanana Gusmao.
And as Thomas fled East Timor in April the mass executions began.
120
people were taking refuge in this house in Dili. They'd already had their
own houses destroyed, they'd been stabbed and beaten, the women had been
raped.
In
April, a large group of militiamen were given drugs and money to come and
attack them again. Dozens of refugees were shot and macheted as they tried
to scramble away, at least 12 of them died here. Others were chased through
the streets of Dili and their fate unknown.
In
the same month 60 people were massacred in church at Liquica. And at least
another 15 killed in other parts of East Timor. And those killers who weren't
paid with the money that had been borrowed were paid with IOU's against
the expected arrival of World Bank funds.
Adelino
"They were on credit, on credit."
Mark:
"They were on credit!"
Adelino:
"They were out of control when they didn't get their money. They even came
and threatened us, as well as Mateus Maia (FPDK) their own commander."
And just as things were turning ugly the World Bank released the loan and
the development and welfare money began to flow.
Ben
Fisher: "Our major objective is to alleviate poverty, this is the major
purpose of the world bank in both the long and short term All of the World
Bank loans have something to do with that."
Ben
Fisher is second in charge of the World Bank in Jakarta. In the early months
of last year relations between the bank and the Indonesian government were
tense. Sources inside the bank report that the bank discovered that development
funds were being stolen and used for political purposes including specific
examples in East Timor.
Because
of proven corruption the World Bank put on hold a billion dollars worth
of specific development funds that the Indonesian government was expecting
to receive in May, but the government wasn't left empty handed. The World
Bank advanced a general budget loan of 500 million US dollars to the government
in May -- the second such loan in 3 months. It now appears ironic that
one of the major purposes of the loan was to assist the Indonesian government
in its efforts to reduce corruption and increase the transparency of it
public service.
Ben
Fisher: "We were very pleased with the governments response at the time
and we disbursed that loan."
The
loan would "provide the cushion for a fiscal stimulus while protecting
the poor and the vulnerable".
The
World Bank was particularly impressed by the government's commitment to
"restore growth, reduce poverty and shield the poor". In fact, it was now
cashed up to kill them.
Jao:
"This is the first 5 billion, issued on 14 May 1999."
Amongst
the rubble, Joao has found some of the cheques that he was ordered to draw
from the Provincial development budget and give directly to integration
and militia groups.
Jao:
"This money wasn't meant for militia activities, it was for aid. Aid. For
example this one was for social welfare project."
This
first cheque drawn from the development budget is for more than a million
dollars. It is written directly to a government official, Radjakarina,
who was able to cash the cheque or deposit directly to his personal account.
Radjakarina, was the Governors secretary. He was also a Senior member of
the BRTT, one of the most prominent pro integration groups, and he was
broadly regarded as its defacto treasurer. The cheque specifically states
that it is for the purposes of a Socialisation team.
Joao
had to ensure that Radjakarina used part of this money to repay the blood
debts from April, and the balance was for the use of integration groups
and their militias
Mark:
"So was any money used for development?"
Adelino:
"No money was spent on development after we gave the 3 billion to the militia.
There was nothing left to spend. No projects went ahead."
Adelino
was in charge of planning and development for the district of Dili. There
were 13 districts in East Timor, each of them receiving more than 3 billion
rupiah for general development and welfare.
Mark:
"So they turned your department into a bank for the militias?"
Adelino:
"It was all for the militia. The whole 1999 budget was for the militia
alone." The World Bank may not be responsible for frauds enacted without
its knowledge. But remarkably the World Bank discovered this fraud in the
first month that it began. A copy of the governors decree ordering the
abuse of development and welfare funds landed in their lap.
Ben:
"oh yeah, I think we've seen this yeah."
The
World Bank became aware of the plan to steal the money for the militias
just weeks after finalising their 500 million US 'anti corruption' loan.
In the past 5 months they'd handed a total of almost a billion US dollars
to the government.
"Mark:
This must have been very disturbing to you.
A:
Certainly
Mark:
Well what was your specific reaction?
Alatas:
"Well my specific reaction and the reaction of my colleagues in government
is that we were very upset. We got told and we got to know about this and
we stopped it immediately and we said no this is not to be ... In last
May and June when we received these very serious allegations and we investigated
them we felt that the response of the central government was as strong
as possible."
Mark:
"Which was to do nothing."
Alatas:
"It wasn't to do nothing. The decrees were rescinded."
If
Jakarta issued a piece of paper rescinding the decrees to steal development
and welfare for the militias apparently only the World Bank took it seriously.
The scam continued without so much as a blip with the Co-operation of a
host of Indonesian ministries. And the cheques kept flowing
"This
is the first payment. After that money was used, they asked for more. And
this is the second payment, issued on the fourth of June..."
These
cheques continue throughout May, June and July and there's more to be found.
They should have been made out to other departments or businesses providing
services to the government. They are all made out directly to individuals
who were openly or covertly linked with the militias including the leader
of the FPDK -- the Bupati of Dili.
Some
openly declare they are for "socialisation" others are supposedly welfare
for the poor but in case Joao was told the money was needed for integration
and militia groups and was told to ignore standard procedures.
"We
have a very rigid administration in the Bupanas and so on. I doubt it.
It's inconceivable that funds that are allocated for something can so easily
be switched for something else. Impossible."
Ali
Alatas is right -- it would be impossible to conduct a barely disguised
fraud such as this without the consent of Senior department officials and
ministers.
Both
Joao from the provincial government and Adelino at the district level maintain
that communication with their ministries in Jakarta regarding this scam
was constant as was the flow of money to the militias.
Adelino:
"We prepared the papers and issued 600 million. That turned out not to
be enough. Then we issued another 300 million. That wasn't enough. After
we'd paid a total of 2.6 billion, they came back and forced us to pay more."
Mark:
"You must have had concerns for the money you had given to Jakarta that
it was being used through the development budget for the militia."
Alatas:
"Sure"
Mark:
"And you became aware of this in May?"
Alatas:
"Absolutely. Mark we had very strong concerns that the development budget
was being used to keep kids in school, to buy medicines, build roads."
Mark:
"But it wasn't!"
Alatas:
"Outside of East Timor..."
This
fraud did not involve specific World Bank projects or staff and the World
Bank weren't the only international donor. But the World Bank knew that
the scheme had begun and they had a billion dollar stick to wield to ensure
it finished.
Mark:
"What I am suggesting is that did you take this seriously enough?"
Alatas:
"Well that's for history to decide Should we penalise School children in
Sulawesi because of what is happening in another part of Indonesia."
For
a week Jose and I tracked down public servants from the development and
welfare sections from Dili to small towns all of them had similar stories.
Maliana
man: "The housing didn't go ahead. The road building didn't go ahead, nor
the water supply for the people. So all of that was diverted to those various
activities."
Benjamin
Barreto was given a job as the Secretary of the Development Department
in Maliana. But he was left in no doubt as to what his real job was, to
fund the pro integration groups referendum and pay the militias blood money.
"For
each person you killed, you got 3 million rupiah. That was the district
military commander's plan. He received 800 million Rupiah for the militias.
He used it for bounty payments. He used it for that."
As
the referendum approached it became absolutely apparent that millions were
being spent on the militias, thousands were on the payroll, transport and
communications provided, tonnes of rice and oil given away to buy votes,
leaders becoming rich.
It
was been broadly assumed that it was the military pouring the money in
but if you were familiar with the workings of the Indonesian government,
if you'd seen the plan, you might have had pause for thought.
Alatas:
"Our understanding was that those would be stopped and to the best of our
knowledge it was stopped. The order was retracted."
And
what wasn't apparent to the world bank would have been known or blatantly
obvious to anyone in the government.
Mark:
"Who did you imagine was paying them"
Alatas:
"I don't know."
Mark:
"Well you must have had some suspicions? Who did you imagine was paying
them?"
Alatas:
"Why should I have suspicions? We are a government."
Mark:
"Because people are dying and you have made pledges to the International
community."
Alatas:
"People are dying and we were against it."
"All
the documents were kept here. That's why they burnt it down. All the documents
concerning money for the militia were issued from here."
By
July of last year, virtually all of the resources of the Dili administration
were at the disposal of the militias and there expenses were now running
out of control. In just 6 months they'd spent probably 12 million dollars
of development and welfare funds, 2 million from Foreign Affairs, the entire
Transmigration budget for East Timor and contributions from other departments
and the referendum was still more than a month away.
Adelino:
"The militias came and kicked in the secretary's door, abusing and threatening
everyone."
Even
more creative accounting by the Indonesian bureaucracy was required.
"We
held a meeting here with the departments of Public Works, Water Supply,
Road and so on, to take 75% of their budgets for the militia and give 25%
to the contractors."
The
time had now come to dip into major projects and for a cut the construction
contractors agreed to sign documents saying that ghost projects were complete
and Indonesia won more brownie points with the international donor community
for all of the roads, bridges, irrigation systems it was apparently building
in East Timor. Everyone was a winner. The frenzy that followed the referendum
in September was a logical conclusion to the madness that had gone before
it.
A madness
incited and paid for not just by the Military but by the Departments of
Information, Transmigration, Foreign Affairs, Planning & Development,
Forestry, Agriculture, Political Affairs and the Department of Finance.
The
Indonesian government may yet be prepared to sacrifice what they are referring
to as 'rogue elements' of the army, but if the rogue elements are taken
to court they are likely to take large sections of the government down
with them.
Alatas:
"We have gone as far as saying that perhaps you know certain rogue elements
were involved, yes. But I don't know..."
Mark:
"Well these rogue elements go right up the command of TNI and now clearly
they cross into the Cabinet. Is Lopez Da Cruz a rogue element?"
Alatas:
"No of course not. But he is not involved in the killing. let's put the
blame where the blame resides."
Mark:
"Well were should the blame reside?"
Alatas:
"Probably those who are wielding the machetes and who are wielding the
guns and so on."
Some
of the people who were wielding the machetes and the guns are being kept
here at this Falintil camp behind Dili. These men have been accused of
being militia members. None of them are militia leaders but they may still
be the only ones who will face the justice system. Not their military commanders
or their ministerial paymasters.
"We
are not educated people who write in offices. We're illiterate, working
in farms and paddy fields. They called us, took our names and said,` you've
got to join this group.' We said, `What are we joining it for?'. They said,
`If you refuse to join, you'll see what happens.' So we were scared and
we joined."
"When
we joined the militia, we thought it was a good thing. But they told us
to do all these things. I knew nothing, but was forced to do all those
things. We did it all against our will. They forced us to do it. I feel
pain inside. We didn't know what was going on. The educated ones set this
up for us to do terrible things to each other."
In
a forest West of Dili Filomena's husband is unearthed. His wife and children
now know how he was killed -- with his ears cut off and his head caved
in. But in a ledger in the department of finance, this is not a grave it's
a road project or a canal, not a murder but a public service.
[The
original transcript was corrected and edited slightly to improve readability
- James Balowski.]
Campaigning
for human rights in East Timor
Green
Left Weekly - February 16, 2000
Dili
-- The East Timor Human Rights Commission (ETHRC) was established on October
1 to conduct investigations and monitoring of human rights violations in
East Timor, educate the East Timorese people about human rights issues
and establish rehabilitation, education and advocacy programs.
ETHRC
was formed by activists and students with a background in law, many of
whom were formerly involved with Kontras, an East Timorese organisation
which conducted investigations into human rights abuses and the whereabouts
of persons detained by the Indonesian military before the August 30 referendum.
The founder and general coordinator of ETHRC, ISABEL FERREIRA, spoke to
Green Left Weekly's JON LAND about the work of ETHRC and its campaign for
the creation of an international war crimes tribunal.
Ferreira
said that the ETHRC has been concentrating on collating information about
human rights violations carried out by the Indonesian military since September.
The investigations are ongoing and it is hoped that the information will
assist the activity of United Nations Transitional Administration in East
Timor (UNTAET) commissions and other bodies investigating human rights
violations in East Timor. The ETHRC's ultimate goal is that the information
be used to prosecute criminals in an international war crimes tribunal.
Ferreira
and others are deeply concerned, however, that, "There is no clear information
about the status or creation of a war crimes tribunal. Often, the information
we receive from UNTAET implies that an international tribunal is not possible
... and that there is little motivation to establish such a tribunal, which
is very disappointing to us." ETHRC believes that this is because there
is not enough pressure being placed on the UN, that the international campaign
for a war crimes tribunal has been "very weak to date".
Another
factor is the investigation by the Indonesian Human Rights Commission (Komnas-HAM)
into the activity of the military in East Timor. Ferreira believes that,
while Komnas-HAM's investigation shows the Indonesian people's desire to
find out the truth about the military's role in East Timor, it may be used
to block an international war crimes tribunal. "The Indonesian government
and military say that their own investigations will be sufficient", Ferreira
said.
ETHRC
is calling for solidarity and human rights organisations to increase their
campaigning for a war crimes tribunal. "Without such a campaign, the people
of East Timor will be denied justice and the perpetrators of human rights
violations will continue their activities", Ferreira told Green Left Weekly.
Over
the coming months, ETHRC will continue its investigations into the killings
and terror that occurred after the referendum. "This will assist not just
in providing evidence for the prosecution of those responsible for human
rights abuses but also in rehabilitating those affected by the violence.
So many Timorese families have been traumatised and there are many problems",
Ferreira explained.
ETHRC,
through its education and advocacy programs, is helping to rebuild Timorese
society, with the aim of assisting East Timorese people to become self-sufficient
economically and fostering a better understanding of democracy, human rights
and gender issues. "We hope that with a greater understanding of these
issues, there will be no need in the future for the people to rely on non-government
organisations or others to pressure and control the government, but that
the people themselves will be able to do this", Ferreira said.
The
work of ETHRC is hampered by many problems, such as limited finances and
the lack of infrastructure in East Timor, from transport to communications.
However, the members of ETHRC are committed to consolidating the work of
the commission, and plan to establish offices in Maliana, Aileu and Baucau,
building upon networks established in these centres and other districts.
Militia
leader's confession
Media
Indonesia - February 16, 2000
The
commission investigating human rights violations in East Timor has finally
completed the report of its findings. The evidence was so convincing that
accusations of physical violence and threats to kill were included. After
questioning dozens of witnesses who were civilian officials in East Timor,
and militia, police and TNI [Indonesian National Military Forces] personnel
of various ranks, the commission was convinced that serious human rights
violations occurred in East Timor. The testimony of one witness [suspect]
to the commission supports the view that they were aided and assisted with
training, weapons and money by the Indonesian military. The following is
the confession of a man suspected of involvement in human rights abuses
as given to the commission.
Q.
What important positions have you held?
A.
In 1974-1976 I was the commander of a 216-strong group fighting for integration
with Indonesia ... But up until East Timor separated from Indonesia, I
was in the BRTT [East Timor People's Front] Security Council...
Q.
At that stage were militia groups already being formed?
A.
It's difficult for me to answer that question. I experienced 24 years of
continuous war. Maybe ABRI [Indonesian Armed Forces] was tired of fighting
Falintil or placed too much trust in us to do it. Basically they gave us
weapons every year.
Q.
Did you receive weapons at the end of 1998 or the beginning of 1999?
A.
We received weapons directly from SGI [joint intelligence unit]. Each commander
took delivery of his own quota of weapons, and some took them home to their
own districts.
Q.
What about 1999?
A.
In the last few months, I also received weapons, but I was ordered to store
them at the Military District Command. On 25th March, the SGI commander
himself and Bambang plus six of their men delivered the weapons to my house
in Ermera.
Q.
How many weapons?
A.
300. But I couldn't take delivery of them all because there wasn't enough
storage space. I told them to store them at the Military District commander's
house. At the same time I was summoned by the East Timor governor.
Q.
What kind of weapons?
A.
Many different kinds. At that time they gave us SKs, AR-16, AK-47. Plus
rifles. I think the rifles were made in Bandung. But the AK and SKs, they
were Russian.
Q.
How were they distributed?
A.
The militia didn't need to write reports; we just used some from the Military
District Command [MDC] because the SGI and Tribuana members who were from
Kopassus [Army Special Forces] were based at the MDC. They wore plain clothes.
If we needed money, we just asked.
Q.
Was the militia free?
A.
The militia was free -- we could burn, arrest, kill -- it was up to us...
Q.
Were the weapons distributed in Ermera?
A.
I had no militia forces in Ermera. But after I went to Jakarta on the 6th,
on the 10th [as received] a regional assembly (DPRD) level II member Antonio
Lima was murdered. Several days later two young children were also murdered.
The people began to panic.
Q.
Is it clear this was carried out by the militia?
A.
It was militia. But it was militia from the Military District Command,
not those from the hills or the villages.
Q.
Were there military personnel who became militia?
A.
Many. Those who were known as militia were in front while the ones behind
were elite troops in Aitarak uniforms.
Q.
Did you know of any plans to carry out massacres in East Timor after February
such as the Liquica case?
A.
It would be better if you asked Joao Tavares that question but I knew myself
that this had been planned for us to carry out. The aim was to threaten
and place pressure on those who wanted independence. Maybe this way we
could have changed them but what happened instead was resentment among
the people.
Q.
Therefore who carried out these murders?
A.
The murders in February 1999 were carried out by militia groups Besi Merah
Putih [Red and White Iron] and Halilintar [Thunder] from Suai, Maliana
and Liquica. Actually this problem and the issue of the 3,250 refugees
had already been conveyed to those at the Muspida [Regional Leaders Conference]
but they said, "It is the Security Disturbance Movement (GPK) they are
against, whether they want to die or do something else, it's up to them,"
he said...
CNRT
accused of violence
Australian
Associated Press - February 16, 2000
Canberra
-- East Timor's main political organisation, the National Council for East
Timorese Resistance (CNRT), was attacking some of the people it had fought
to protect, it was reported today.
Evidence
had also emerged that the CNRT was acting as a de facto government in defiance
of the United Nations mandate to administer the former Indonesian territory's
move to independence, according to an SBS TV report.
Jean
Christian Cady, a spokesman for the UN's administrative force in East Timor
(UNTAET), said the CNRT was playing a big role in how East Timor was being
run. "We are in constant contact with the CNRT in order to make the measures
that we are proposing approved by the largest majority of the East Timorese
population," he told SBS.
But
the CNRT had been accused of stand-over tactics and violence against its
own people. Interfet chief of staff Colonel Bruce Armstrong said violence
was often being wrongly blamed on militias.
"It
seems to be quite common that whenever there is any disagreement between
the East Timorese, one will say, 'he is militia'," Col Armstrong said.
"And then we investigate it turns they had nothing to do with the militia."
Humanitarian
worker Alexandre Pires, just returned from Atabai, about 100km west of
Dili, said refugees crossing back from West Timor were being targeted by
CNRT. "They are terrified to talk," he said. "The local Atabai police will
beat them and possibly kill them. I know, because I am from Atabai and
because of my work."
Human
rights activist Joaquim Fonseca said some CNRT bosses, like the militias,
must be brought to justice. "It is regrettable that at this stage the CNRT
is acting in contravention to the principle they have defended for years,"
he said.
There
were reports of CNRT officers ordering the confiscation of personal assets
for what they described as state work. Such an order would directly contravene
the UN's mandate to govern the country. CNRT chief and independence fighter
Xanana Gusmao said he was not aware of any such orders. "If they are ...
hurting people, confiscating buildings or cars, I will take action." Catholic
Bishop Carlos Belo said he was concerned about the CNRT's actions. "I've
had meetings with young people, with different groups in the church and
we talk openly about this," he said.
The
evidence against Wiranto
British
Broadcasting Coorporation - February 13, 2000
Jonathan
Head -- It was at the beginning of last year that we first started to hear
reports of attacks by new pro-Indonesian militia gangs in East Timor. It
was not, however, the first time the Indonesian army had used such a tactic.
Soon
after their invasion of East Timor in 1975, local people were recruited
to help fight the pro-independence guerrillas who continued to resist the
occupation.
In
the early 1990s, paramilitary youth groups were formed by the Indonesian
military to counter the clandestine campaign against Indonesian rule being
conducted by Timorese civilians in the towns.
Army
commanders routinely denied any connection with the groups, but according
to official military documents obtained by the BBC in 1998, the paramilitaries
came directly under the local army command structure.
Evidence
that the military were behind the new militias became even clearer. Last
February I sat in the headquarters of the Indonesian garrison in Dili,
waiting for an interview with Colonel Tono Suratman, the local commander.
Next
to me was a group of rough-looking Timorese. One had part of his ear missing.
He explained that they were part of the Garda Paksi, a pro-Indonesian paramilitary
group, and they had come to obtain more weapons from the army to combat
the increasingly assertive pro-independence movement. They were welcomed
like friends by the soldiers. I have little doubt that they got their guns.
Integration
or death
A few
days later I met Cancio Cavalhao and Eurico Gutteres -- little known back
then, but later to become the two most notorious militia leaders.
Eurico
was shy with us -- it was only later that he developed an appetite for
bombarding the media with emotional and often contradictory speeches --
but Cancio was quite explicit about what they were planning, and who was
helping them.
A good-looking
former civil servant in the Indonesian Justice Ministry, he had just formed
his own militia group, Mahidi, an acronym for Live or Die for Integration
with Indonesia.
He
explained how he had been given modern automatic weapons by the Indonesian
military, and how he had used them in an attack on a village in which six
people died, including a pregnant woman.
If
President Habibie persisted with his plan to offer East Timor independence,
he said, the militias would fight to the death, and destroy the country.
Our
reports at the time were widely publicised in Indonesia, and General Wiranto,
then the armed forces commander, was asked about them. He simply denied
that they could be true.
He
also supported the formation for so-called People's Defence Groups under
the army's command, even though militia leaders like Cancio Cavalhao were
allowed to lead these groups.
Blood-splattered
church
Last
April, the militias began expanding from their stronghold near the border
with Indonesia towards Dili. In their path lay the seaside town of Liquica,
a known pro-independence stronghold.
Three
of my colleagues and I arrived there a few hours after they took it over.
There was blood spattered all around the church. Badly wounded men lay
groaning on the ground. Several women wept hysterically, saying dozens
of men had been slaughtered.
The
local priest later told us how Indonesian soldiers and riot police helped
the militias in their attack on the town's population -- we could still
see militia leaders and soldiers chatting and smoking together. The final
death toll from Liquica may exceed 50.
We
reported the army's involvement, and the way militias were killing with
impunity. General Wiranto did nothing. Against all the evidence, he described
the incident as a clash between pro- and anti Indonesian gangs.
Soldiers
cheered militias
On
17 April, hundreds of militiamen were allowed to rally in front of the
Governor's office, waving their weapons. Anywhere else in Indonesia this
would not have been tolerated. But in East Timor, the Indonesian soldiers
cheered their paramilitary allies.
Led
by Eurico Gutteres, the militias then went on a rampage through the town
that left at least a dozen people dead. We filmed him and his men, using
automatic weapons with their Indonesian army serial numbers still clearly
visible, firing into a house where more than 100 were hiding. The 17 year-old
son of pro-independence campaigner Manuel Carrascalao was one of those
killed.
When
I tried to approach the house, armed Indonesian police blocked my way.
Behind them, the militiamen could be seen using army trucks to take the
bodies away.
I raised
the clear collaboration between the two with several Indonesian officials,
and was told to mind my own business. General Wiranto was interviewed that
night, and insisted that his men had done everything possible to control
the violence.
No
action was taken against any militiamen. They moved about Dili freely,
displaying their Indonesian weapons as a warning to the rest of the population.
Strict
hierarchy
The
militia attacks, and the refusal of the Indonesian military to stop them,
continued after the arrival of the United Nations in May. The UN complained
frequently to General Wiranto. Just as often he promised to curb the militias,
but although there were some lulls, they were never long.
The
appalling scenes of destruction we witnessed last September were merely
an escalation of what had been going all year, indeed throughout the Indonesian
occupation. We now have documents and tapes that show beyond doubt that
the militias were being armed and directed by senior commanders of the
Indonesian military.
It
is inconceivable that General Wiranto did not know about this -- in fact,
given the strict hierarchy within the armed forces, it is highly unlikely
that the order to back the militias, or perhaps even to set them up, did
not have General Wiranto's direct approval.
There
is some evidence that by last September, General Wiranto had started to
lose control of the monster he helped create. But from everything I witnessed
during my seven trips to East Timor last year, there is a powerful case
for him to be held responsible for many of the terrible events that took
place there.
Workers
strike at floating hotels
Agence
France Presse - February 14, 2000
Negotiations
continued Friday to resolve one of East Timor's first labor disputes, which
saw a day-long walkout from the two floating hotels housing UN employees.
About
40 East Timorese workers at the Olympia and Amos W. hotels walked off the
job on Thursday to protest wages, working hours and alleged discrimination.
They
were back cleaning rooms, doing laundry and catering Friday as hotel management
moved to address their complaints. "Yes, they were right in their points,"
said Wouter Lap, acting manager of the two floating hotels.
The
strikers work for Eurest, an international firm subcontracted by the hotels,
Lap said. "We insist to them they must increase our salary," said Domingos
da Silva, one of the strike leaders. The employees earn five Australian
dollars (about 3.5 US dollars) a day but were asking for 25 dollars, he
said.
De
Silva, a room boy, said they want their 72-hour work week reduced. They
also object to searches of their bags conducted in front of East Timorese
bystanders on the docksides outside the hotels, he said. "They are suspicious
that maybe we are steal something," da Silva said.
"We
want justice," said another room boy, Milton Dias Ximenes. Lap said negotiations
to resolve the dispute have been conducted with the help of two representatives
from the National Council of Timorese Resistance. He said wages can be
raised to between 8.50 and 9.00 dollars a day, while the subcontractor
is prepared to reduce the work week.
Spot
checks of workers leaving the hotels will continue, but in a more sensitive
manner, he said. "In any hotel operation, you have to have spot checks,"
he said. Lap also said new managers are arriving to run the sub-contractor's
operation. "The two guys who are there now, they will leave within a week's
time," Lap said. Workers were not happy with the two foreign supervisors,
he said.
During
the day-long strike, more than 30 East Timorese working in the bar, security
and front office, employed directly by the hotel, continued to work. Those
workers already earn a minimum of eight Australian dollars a day.
The
taming of the general
Asiaweek
- February 25, 2000
Sangwon
Suh and Dewi Loveard, Jakarta -- After two weeks of tense standoff, it
was over. Late on Sunday, February 13, Indonesian President Abdurrahman
Wahid finally carried out what he had been promising to do: remove Gen.
Wiranto, coordinating minister for security and political affairs, from
his cabinet. The announcement was received with surprising grace and composure
by Wiranto. No tanks appeared in the streets, and the stock market remained
calm. The world let out a collective sigh of relief. Indonesia's democracy
appeared safe, at least for now.
The
confrontation between the two men began on January 31, when the National
Human Rights Commission released a report implicating a number of military
officials, including Wiranto, in the East Timor violence last year. Wahid,
who was in Europe at the time, called on the general to step down. Wiranto
refused, saying there was no evidence to support the commission's conclusions.
As
Wahid made his way through Europe, he reiterated his call for Wiranto's
resignation, but the general steadfastly declined to budge. All the while,
Indonesians and the international community watched the long-distance standoff
with growing unease. If Wiranto prevailed, it would be a blow to the four-month-old
civilian government, a sign that the president could not control the military.
If Wahid prevailed, then who knew how the former armed-forces chief and
his hardline supporters would react?
Wahid
returned to Indonesia on February 13 for what would be a final showdown.
He immediately called a meeting with Vice President Megawati Sukarnoputri,
Attorney-General Marzuki Darusman and Wiranto at the presidential palace.
According to sources in the palace, Wiranto insisted that his case should
be first investigated by the attorney-general's office; he charged that
the commission's report was more a "political phenomenon than law." Darusman,
who is also chairman of the commission, countered that it would be difficult
to carry out an impartial probe while Wiranto was still in office. "Our
investigators would feel reluctant to investigate such a high-ranking officer,"
he later told Asiaweek.
Unable
to sway Wiranto, Wahid announced afterwards that the coordinating minister
would remain in his post. It was a blow, it seemed, to the president and
to Indonesia's reformist forces, and on Monday morning newspaper headlines
around the region trumpeted this setback. But even before the papers came
out, Wahid had already made a dramatic U-turn. That Sunday night, he summoned
Megawati (who was at a restaurant at the time and had to leave with her
food in take-away bags). After conferring with her, Wahid made his decision:
Wiranto would be suspended from the cabinet until a final verdict on his
East Timor role came out. The news, formally announced the next morning,
took everyone, including Wiranto, by surprise.
Later
that day, Wiranto attended the swearing-in ceremony of his replacement,
Home Affairs Minister Surjadi Sudirja. Wiranto was not accompanied by his
wife. A source from the general's office explained: "His wife is still
shocked, since the family was only told of the news at 6am, after they
had finished their morning prayers." At the ceremony, Wiranto's colleagues
tried to relieve the tension by giving him hugs and hearty handshakes.
There
were grumblings from hardline elements in the military over the latest
development. "Gus Dur [Wahid's nickname] has gone too far," complains one
active general. "I hope this is the last time he causes the military to
lose face in public; otherwise we're afraid we will have to take some action
to restore our dignity." For the time being, though, Wiranto's removal
seems to have happened without much fuss. Wiranto himself greeted the suspension
with equanimity, saying it was within the president's power to make such
a decision.
"This
is a task that is given by God, by the government and by the nation," he
said. "If the confidence is not there anymore, I am ready to accept that
I have to stand down."
How
did Wahid manage to defuse the situation without triggering a crisis? First,
he took care to make the pill easier to swallow for Wiranto. By suspending
him, rather than sacking him outright, the cleric-turned-president enabled
Wiranto to save some face and also left the door open for the general's
return, should he be exonerated of any crimes. Wiranto's successor Surjadi
underlined this point when he was being sworn in. "I only serve this position
until there is a conclusion about Wiranto's position," he said. "If within
one month he is proven not guilty, I will give it back to him."
Another
factor is the sheer support that Wahid commands, both inside and outside
the country. The US repeatedly warned would-be conspirators in the military
not to harbor any ideas of a coup. Wahid's recent overseas tour served
to cement his standing among world leaders, a point underscored by UN Secretary-General
Kofi Annan's visit to Indonesia on February 14. It was also clear that
any coup would come at a heavy economic price, as foreign investors would
pull out at the first sign of political uncertainty. Wiranto himself said
as much after his suspension: "Without my standing down, it would be difficult
to invite foreign investors to put their money in Indonesia."
Domestically,
too, Wahid's standing is unassailable. As the country's first democratically
elected leader in decades, he remains popular among ordinary Indonesians.
Equally significant, the armed forces are behind him; they reaffirmed their
support for the president after Wiranto's removal. The latter is at least
partly Wahid's doing. Over the months, he slowly whittled away at Wiranto's
power base, removing the general's supporters from key positions and replacing
them with reformist officers. Thus, says a two-star general, Wiranto never
had a chance to mobilize his power within the military. "I can assure you
that no action is underway following the announcement," he says. "This
crude but brilliant president has been able to unscrew most of the bolts
of Wiranto's machine."
The
final key to Wahid's success is his modus operandi. Both his critics and
his followers have complained that his intentions can be very difficult
to fathom, given his penchant for making confusing, even contradictory,
statements. This tendency was not absent during the standoff. Throughout
his Europe tour, Wahid's message was consistent: Wiranto had to go. But
at times he made conciliatory noises, causing observers to think he was
backtracking. One moment, he was saying he would remove Wiranto as soon
as he got back; next, he was crediting the general with saving him and
Megawati from an assassination plot a few years ago. Such seeming changes
of heart confounded his European hosts -- and no doubt kept his enemies
wrongfooted (as did his complete flip-flop after his return to Jakarta).
This
approach has led many to wonder if the apparent madness in the method is
deliberate or if he is fumbling around aimlessly. Brilliance or just dumb
luck? Sometimes, it is hard to tell. But whatever it is, it seems to be
working -- for now.
Wiranto
goes on TV to defend allegations
Agence
France-Presse - February 17, 2000
Jakarta
-- Former Indonesian armed forces chief General Wiranto appeared on television
here Wednesday to defend himself against allegations that he let his troops
go on a bloody rampage in East Timor last year.
Wiranto's
public appearance coincided with the last day of a visit to Jakarta by
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and came three days after he was suspended
as security minister by President Abdurrahman Wahid.
Annan
has repeatedly urged Indonesia to prosecute those found guilty of violence
in East Timor, and warned the UN will try to set up an international war
crimes tribunal if it doesn't.
In
the lengthy interview with the private RCTI television channel, Wiranto
displayed his own collection of video compact discs showing his peace message
at the inauguration of a peace pact between conflicting East Timorese factions
before the UN- sponsored vote on independence on August 30.
"The
TNI [military] as a solid institution ... which carries out a mission based
on clear guidelines and procedures, would never plan something that can
violate human rights," Wiranto said. The ballot itself was a success but
was tainted by rigging by local UN officials, Wiranto charged.
"We
could create a peaceful situation for four months [before the vote]. There
were 4,000 foreigners and all of them were safe. We received praise from
foreign countries," Wiranto said of his efforts to keep peace in the territory.
"But
the ballot was announced too early ... and the result was a blow to pro-integrationists.
This triggered emotional outburst," he said of the result, which was overwhelmingly
in favor of independence from Indonesia after 24 years of a quasi-military
rule.
He
admitted some of his troops took part in an orgy of burning, looting and
killing unleashed by pro-Indonesian militia as soon as the vote results
were announced on September 4. "I never denied this. I accept this as a
fact," he said. "I admit there were individuals from the military and police
who acted against the law, and they happened to be native East Timorese."
He also said he had asked his successor as military chief, Admiral Widodo
Adisucipto, to process those participating in the violence according to
the law.
On
Tuesday in an interview with a radio station Wiranto hit out at military
officers close to Wahid and hinted they might have influenced the president's
decision to drop him from the cabinet.
Late
Sunday, Wahid suspended Wiranto as coordinating minister for political
and security affairs in a dramatic turn-about after the general appeared
to have won a two-week standoff with the president.
Wiranto,
who has accepted the decision, and five other senior generals have been
implicated in human rights abuses during the East Timor violence.
On
the possibility of his supporters creating havoc following his removal
from the cabinet, Wiranto said: "That's what I'm worried about. Don't let
this affair become a pretext for other parties to create new troubles.
Our nation already has a multitude of problems." he said.
The
Jakarta Stock Exchange composite index dropped 2.4 percent on Wednesday
amid rumors Wiranto's followers might try to create trouble. Widodo on
Monday reassured the president publicly that all branches of the armed
forces supported his decision to drop Wiranto.
Wahid
'bowed to international pressure on Wiranto'
Sydney
Morning Herald - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- Indonesia's President Abdurrahman Wahid decided to suspend General Wiranto
over his involvement in human rights abuses in East Timor after significant
international pressure, a leading legislator, Mr Amien Rais, said yesterday.
Mr
Wahid, who reversed an announcement made six hours earlier that his Co-ordinating
Minister for Political and Security Affairs could stay in his job, had
explained the intense pressure in a phone call, Mr Rais said.
Mr
Rais, chairman of Indonesia's highest legislative body, the People's Consultative
Assembly, applauded Mr Wahid's change of mind, and said responsibility
for the atrocities in East Timor should rest with General Wiranto.
But
the Speaker of Parliament, Mr Akbar Tanjung, who is also chairman of the
second largest party, Golkar, said General Wiranto could join his political
team anytime, even if the Attorney-General, Mr Marzuki Darusman, found
he had a case to answer over East Timor.
"If
he resigns from the military and becomes a civilian we would welcome him
to join Golkar," Mr Akbar said. When asked if that would apply even if
there were a cloud over General Wiranto's name, Mr Akbar replied: "It's
OK, never mind."
Mr
Rais said Mr Wahid's manner of suspending General Wiranto was "a bit reckless"
but that most people supported him. "Eight hours before he made the decision,
the final decision, President Gus Dur [Mr Wahid's popular name] was talking
to me over the phone saying that he was under international pressure,"
Mr Rais said. When asked whether he thought the pressure had come from
other countries, international institutions or foreign investors, Mr Rais
said: "All of them".
General
Wiranto has been suspended after being named, with five other police and
military officers, by an independent Indonesian investigation into violence
in East Timor. But Mr Rais did not think the other officers mentioned in
the report should also be suspended. "Wiranto was the man in charge," Mr
Rais said.
He
said the two-week long-distance saga over whether General Wiranto would
resign had taken a toll on Mr Wahid's credibility, but Mr Rais said the
Central Axis grouping of Muslim parties he represents would not make a
hasty decision.
"We
can still accept Mr Gus Dur as our president, but we will watch him very
closely. "If he deviates a little bit we will ... flip his ear, and if
he deviates too much we will spank him politically, and if he violates
the Constitution we will stop him. It remains to be seen whether he will
really do stupid things or not. After Wiranto's resignation, if the steps
taken by Gus Dur are accountable, are reasonable, in parallel with the
expectation of the people in this reform era, I think he will continue
holding his job."
High-wire
act leaves them guessing
South
China Morning Post - February 15, 2000
Vaudine
England -- Interpreting the statements and intent of President Abdurrahman
Wahid is a full-time, fascinating, but often frustrating task for anyone
interested in tracking the evolution of this new and highly original democracy.
Broadly,
there are two ways of watching this near-blind man doing his high-wire
act. The first perspective is that Mr Wahid, or "Gus Dur" as he is called
locally, is an erratic, ill and arrogant man who vacillates wildly and
talks too much.
To
those who say this, President Wahid makes up policy on the hoof, fails
to consult or listen, and delights in confusing everyone, producing what
appears to be an endless succession of gaffes and contradictions.
"This
is just another big game of Wahid's -- he just likes to play with peoples'
emotions," said a proponent of this view yesterday. "His office is chaos
and policy is all over the place. I ask you, is this the way to run a country?"
Meanwhile,
the second school holds that, in fact, Mr Wahid is a profoundly clever
man with a sharply honed political sense and a mind which works on many
levels at once.
Under
this scenario, Mr Wahid is calculating all manner of permutations and results
which we are all too simple to understand, so that his statements are part
of a clearly conceived plan aimed at accommodating the country's many complexities
in a brilliant blend of ideals and rigorous realpolitik.
"There
is nothing he does which is not all worked out in advance," said a confidant
of the President. "Basically there is nothing chaotic," said Marine Resources
Minister Sarwono Kusumaatmadja. "The thread is clear. Gus Dur is consolidating
his position," he said. "This is just his style."
There
is truth in both points of view; Mr Wahid is a victim of two strokes and
is virtually blind, relying on an inner circle of friends and relatives
to receive his daily information. He is also a highly educated and sophisticated
man who managed, during the rule of former strongman Suharto, to be both
a daring leader of the democracy movement and a regular visitor to Suharto.
At the same time, he led the country's largest Muslim organisation, the
Nahdlatul Ulama, while being one of Asia's most tolerant and inclusive
men of religion.
Juggling
acts like these are a political art form, especially in a polity such as
Indonesia, where ritual, pride and high stakes combine in a sweetly devious
mix. "Wahid's style is to float first this way, then the other, back and
forth, and then he will decide very quickly," Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono
said. "Oh yes, we all have to get used to his style. Everyone has to --
ministers, diplomats, journalists. We all have to learn."
Wahid
achieves delicate balance
South
China Morning Post - February 15, 2000
Vaudine
England, Jakarta -- Indonesian President Abdurrahman Wahid yesterday achieved
exactly what he wanted -- General Wiranto's absence from government --
without destabilising the nation's delicate political balance.
He
also protected national honour by suspending the man accused of rights
crimes in East Timor, just one day before United Nations Secretary-General
Kofi Annan was due to arrive in Jakarta to assess whether Indonesia can
prosecute its own or if an international war crimes tribunal should be
formed.
But
the way he achieved this victory raised doubts about his credibility. Mr
Wahid can claim victory on two fronts: asserting his right to hire and
fire whom he pleases, even leading generals; and displaying support for
the rule of law and human rights institutions. But this event's place in
the struggle between civilian and military rule is more significant, as
those hoping to see General Wiranto face trial will probably be disappointed.
"Gus
Dur [Mr Wahid] firmly believes that Wiranto is not ultimately culpable,"
said Defence Minister Juwono Sudarsono. Mr Wahid's achievement, in just
more than 100 days in power, has been the emasculation of the military
and the whittling away of some of its privileges in government, to make
the point that civilian rule is supreme.
Under
ex-president Suharto, soldiers enjoyed impunity for deeds ranging from
petty corruption to rape and robbery, and were rarely called to account.
Despite
all the contradictory statements and apparent turnarounds, it is clear
that this state of affairs is coming to an end. "He's done it at last,
thank goodness," said a Western diplomat. "But why did he have to take
us all round in circles along the way?"
Most
Indonesians are not shocked by the twists and turns and even the armed
forces spokesman, Air Force Rear Marshal Graito Usodo, said: "It's his
prerogative. Gus Dur has the right to change his mind."
The
result is a government, chosen in the country's most democratic elections
so far, which is highly dependent on the complex mind and manoeuvres of
one man. The imposition of Mr Wahid's will on General Wiranto is the most
dramatic in what can be seen as a long line of steps towards his goal of
putting the military in its place.
Mr
Wahid has already appointed a civilian as defence minister and made the
previously army-dominated post of forces chief over to a navy man. He sacked
the armed forces spokesman who dared to question a civilian president's
right to interfere in military matters.
His
success lies in his ability to keep everyone off guard, and his staff divided,
so that no one is strong enough to challenge him in his highly vulnerable
position as leader of a large, poor and violently fractious country. But
observers at home and abroad might wish there was more clarity and less
chaos in the process.
Wiranto
goes out with a whimper
Sydney
Morning Herald - February 15, 2000
Lindsay
Murdoch, Jakarta -- Indonesia's military yesterday pledged its loyalty
to President Wahid after he suspended General Wiranto in an extraordinary
back-flip just hours after declaring that he could remain in the Cabinet.
Ending
a tense stand-off that was threatening Indonesia's transition from military
to democratic rule, Mr Wahid removed General Wiranto as Co-ordinating Minister
for Political and Security Affairs.
Appearing
shattered, General Wiranto later admitted for the first time responsibility
for the bloodbath in East Timor last year because he was the armed forces
commander at the time.
But
he denied any direct involvement and called for people to await the outcome
of the Attorney-General's investigation into the violence. Speaking at
the presidential palace, General Wiranto said: "I'm responsible for human
rights abuses in East Timor ... that needs to be clarified by the Attorney-General
before they take it to court."
For
months he has rejected accusations by Indonesian and United Nations investigators
that he was responsible for the military- backed violence in East Timor,
and at times even tried to deny that it had happened.
General
Wiranto told reporters that he refused to resign as Mr Wahid had repeatedly
requested during the President's recent overseas trip because "I wanted
to help him get a full report before he made the decision". "If there are
changes, it is his right," he said. "Don't make it as a big matter."
After
avoiding confronting General Wiranto during a meeting at the palace late
on Sunday and saying he could remain pending the investigation, Mr Wahid
prepared papers formalising the sacking and telephoned him with the news.
As
Indonesians woke to find Mr Wahid had acted, the armed forces commander,
Admiral Widodo, moved to dispel rumours that soldiers loyal to their former
commander would act to remove Mr Wahid, the country's first democratically
elected president.
"I,
together with the navy, army and air force chiefs of staff, believe that
what has been decided by the President has of course gone through a process
of comprehensive consideration ... the President's decision is intended
for the national interest." Admiral Widodo added: "Therefore all levels
in the TNI [armed forces] are loyal and will safeguard the decision to
be implemented in a good manner."
In
a move indicating that Mr Wahid has no intention of bringing General Wiranto
back into the Cabinet, the President announced that the Minister for Home
Affairs, Lieutenant-General Surjadi Soedirdja, would take over his ministerial
responsibilities. General Soedirdja is a former governor of Jakarta and
member of Mr Wahid's National Awakening Party.
Mr
Wahid, a frail Muslim cleric who was elected in October, has already promised
that he will pardon General Wiranto if he is found guilty by an Indonesian
court.
Before
leaving the presidential palace, General Wiranto took a swipe at one of
the army's highest-profile reforming officers, Major-General Agus Wirahadikusuma,
who on Sunday had urged Mr Wahid to sack General Wiranto. General Wiranto
said he felt "sad and guilty" because it had been his job to guide officers
under his command. "I feel I have failed because those officers which I
had trained have taken that kind of attitude ... they criticised me in
a public forum. According to the officers' ethic code that's unethical."
Amien
Rais reelected PAN chairman
Jakarta
Post - February 14, 2000
Sri
Wahyuni and Asip Agus Hasani, Yogyakarta -- The expectations spoke for
themselves when Amien Rais remained virtually unchallenged in his bid to
retain the National Mandate Party chairmanship on Sunday.
Amien
won 584 of the 786 votes cast in the election that marked the final day
of the party's first congress. Outgoing secretary- general Faisal Basri
earned 124 votes, while the other candidate qualifying for the race, A.M.
Fatwa, took 77. Only one ballot was declared invalid, because it named
two candidates.
Originally,
five candidates qualified for the election, but Abdillah Toha and Hatta
Rajasa threw in the towel, saying they realized they had only a remote
chance of beating Amien.
"Amien
is like Mike Tyson for me. I would have certainly lost," Abdillah said,
referring to the former undisputed world heavyweight boxing champion. In
a late night session, the congress participants elected four members of
the party's central board of executives to be in the Amien-led team assigned
to select the party's new executives: Faisal, Fatwa, Hatta Rajasa and Patrialis
Akbar. Other members of the board are Yogyakarta chairman A.R. Iskandar
and his East Java and South Sulawesi counterparts Suwardi and M. Askin.
Faisal
said he would decline a second term as secretary-general, citing personal
reasons. "I reject my candidacy [for the secretary-general post], not because
I was against any changes to the party's founding platform, but because
I have to honor my commitment to hold a position only once," Faisal said.
"I need a new challenge." Faisal's withdrawal paved the way for Hatta to
take the team's key post.
Amien
said after his election that this would be his last term, which will last
until 2005. "I hope there will be a young cadre, who is better than me,
to take the top job in 2005. One of my concerns is how to generate brilliant
party cadres, mainly because the party is very young," Amien said.
The
voting, which lasted three hours, went smoothly, but many of the voters
vacated the convention room during ballot-counting. Some of them were seen
packing their bags or enjoying an entertainment performance near the swimming
pool in the Mustika Sheraton Hotel, which hosted the four-day congress.
Asked
about Amien's reelection, Faisal said he accepted whatever the congress
decided and would support the party's efforts to win the most votes in
the 2004 general election. "Pak Amien received a very significant mandate
from the congress, but personally I asked him to also struggle for what
my friends and I envisioned for PAN," he said.
Bara
Hasibuan, a close associate of Faisal, however, said that having collected
124 votes, Faisal deserved a key position as one of the party's deputy
chairmen. Faisal said he was surprised by his vote earning. Prior to the
congress he predicted he would only win up to 10 percent of the vote. "It
was indeed beyond my expectations," he said.
He
presumed his support came mostly from young constituents, especially those
who shared his progressive way of thinking. "But I hope they won't be too
progressive compared to what I did [in criticizing the party], which seems
to me I perhaps went too far," he said. Political observer Mahfud M.D.
of Yogyakarta's Indonesian Islamic University said Amien's reelection came
as no surprise.
However,
he praised the fact that there were no signs of blocking any candidates
from running for the chairmanship. "We have seen in the past a strong candidate
pressing his or her contenders, who then made an early exit," he said.
Mahfud
said Amien's heaviest burden would be how to unite factions within the
party. "If disputes are not quickly and wisely settled, especially the
one regarding the party's founding principle, the split will remain," he
said.
"I
think the solution which meets the conflicting interests is keeping the
founding platform. The ad hoc committee should decide so as faith and devotion
could be applied in the program, not necessarily in its official platform,"
he added.
According
to Faisal, the most urgent task of the chairman for the following years
is to make the party understand the needs of its constituents. "We are
intelligent, but intelligence does not guarantee that we can understand
the demands of our constituents," Faisal said.
Death
toll in Aceh tumult reaches 179 this year
Jakarta
Post -- February 19, 2000
Banda
Aceh -- Nine more people were reported killed in Aceh in the last two days,
raising the death toll for the year to 179.
A total
of 151 civilians, 15 Indonesian Military (TNI) members and 13 policemen
were recorded as casualties in the continuing violence in the restive province.
The toll is expected to rise and may well exceed last year's total of 293
as a political solution to end the violence has yet to be found. Last month
the National Police announced that 202 civilians were among those killed
in Aceh last year.
The
latest deaths occurred at three separate places on Thursday. Six men, believed
to be members of the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), were shot in Panggong village
in Krueng Sabe district, West Aceh, military resort chief Col. Syarifuddin
Tippe said in Meulaboh. However, Abu Khaidir, the GAM spokesman in Krueng
Sabe, said the six victims were farmers working in their fields who were
caught in the crossfire of the clash between GAM and the military took
place.
Still
in West Aceh, two men were found dead at an oil palm plantation with their
throats cut. Local police said the two, Kariono and Karim, were workers
of the plantation in Darul Makmur district. Their bodies were sent to Meulaboh
hospital.
In
North Aceh a civilian, identified as Zulkifli Adam, 45, was shot dead by
two unidentified youths in front of junior high school SMP Seunuddon, North
Aceh Police hief Lt. Col. Syafei Aksal said on Thursday.
Also
on Thursday a resident of Lhoksukon, Ibrahim, 35, survived a shooting by
an unknown man. In North Aceh, a 10-year-old girl, Ainol Mardhiah, was
hurt when a grenade was thrown at Samudra Police Station. Police said unidentified
man threw the grenade as the girl played in the station's yard.
9
policemen, 3 civilians wounded in Irian Jaya riot
Agence
France-Presse - February 17, 2000 (abridged)
Jakarta
-- Nine policemen were injured and three residents suffered gunshot wounds
when police opened fire during a riot in a town in Indonesia's easternmost
province of Irian Jaya, a report said Thursday.
Some
400 residents of Merauke, many armed with primitive weapons, went on the
rampage in the town Wednesday, vandalizing the local state radio station
and pelting a local police office with stones, the daily Kompas newspaper
said.
A total
of nine policemen were wounded when several of the protestors stabbed them
with sharp weapons in two separate attacks, Kompas said. Troops opened
fire to try to disperse the protestors, wounding three residents who were
later listed in serious condition, it said.
The
riot was triggered by protesters who ran amok after a rally outside the
city's parliament building to demand that officials to stop promoting a
government autonomy proposal.
Irian
Jaya police chief, Brigadier General S.Y. Wenas, was quoted by the newspaper
as saying that police had no choice other than to open fire to stop the
mob from going berzerk. "Therefore we have to take stern action by firing
towards the crowds ... one of them was shot in the stomach ... and then
they became more brutal," Wenas said.
Earlier
reports received from Merauke Wednesday had said three people were injured
in the riot. Police in the area could not be reached by telephone.
[On
February 17, the Jakarta Post reported that according to the Institute
of Human Rights Studies and Advocacy, an 18 year- old high-school student,
Paskalis Betayob, was killed in the clash. One of the institute's executives,
Aloysius Renwarin, said he died of gunshot wounds in the back and chest.
Please have yet to confirm the death - James Balowski.]
`Suspect
went missing to thwart investigation'
Jakarta
Post - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- The independent commission on rights abuse in Aceh has suggested that
the disappearance of a key suspect in an alleged massacre in the province,
was engineered to conceal the identity of the "intellectual perpetrators"
of the violence.
"It
is too obvious not to believe the disappearance is politically engineered.
A particular institution clearly wants to hamper the investigation," said
Rosita Noer secretary to the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the
Violence in Aceh.
Speaking
at a media briefing here on Tuesday, Rosita would not elaborate when asked
which institution she meant. "We all know who it is," she remarked. "Sudjono
is the material witness to the killings and his presence at the trial can
be used to find the intellectual engineers behind the violence," Rosita
added.
Lt.
Col. Sudjono, intelligence chief at the Lhokseumawe-based Lilawangsa Military
Command, was officially declared a deserter on January 18 after failing
to return to duty after being given permission to go on a two-week leave
to his hometown in West Java.
Sudjono
is among 20 military and civilians to stand trial for the Bantaqiah killings
which occurred in the Beutong area in Aceh in July when soldiers allegedly
shot dead religious teacher Tengku Bantaqiah, his wife, students and several
farmers. The military claims that they were killed in an exchange of fire
and were supporters of rebel groups in the province.
According
to officials a joint military civilian court was due to commence this month
to try the case. However the trial has now been hampered by Sudjono's disappearance.
The case would have set a precedent as it was one of the five central cases
of violence brought forward by the commission last year as evidence of
rights abuses in Aceh.
The
Indonesian Military (TNI) have repeatedly denied suggestions that they
were involved in Sudjono's disappearance.
Commission
chairman Amran Zamzami said it was too much of a coincidence for Sudjono
simply to disappear after his name was implicated in the commission report.
"His name has been included in our list [in the report] since September.
After we pushed for trials, suddenly the Attorney General says Lt. Col.
Sudjono is missing," Amran remarked.
Rosita
added that after announcing its report, the commission proposed a witness
protection program and close scrutiny of alleged suspects, but the government
ignored the proposals. "We have worked hard and the investigation and evidence
implicates Sudjono as a suspect so we demand the related institution find
him," she said.
Recently,
Attorney General Marzuki Darusman said the government will have to decide
whether to proceed with the trial without Sudjono. The commission was formed
in July 1999 to investigate numerous reports of human rights abuses in
the restive province, most of whom were allegedly perpetrated by security
forces.
Many
observers see the uncovering of these abuses and eventual trial as the
first step to healing the wounds from riotous discontent in the province.
The
commission also called on Monday for the government to show more concern
in expediting the trials of alleged rights abuses in Aceh. "What we hear
now is promises from the Attorney General and the military that the trials
will begin soon. But till today, we've heard of no developments," Amran
said. He said any attempt at reconciliation in Aceh [will fail] if these
five cases are not sufficiently prosecuted.
The
other four cases in question are: the rape of a woman in Pidie in 1996;
the killing of seven people in Idi Cut in February; the fatal shooting
of dozens of protesters in North Aceh in May; and the tortures between
1997 and 1998 in Rumah Geudong, Pidie. "It's already mid-February 2000
and we've been promised (a trial) since December 15," Amran said.
The
commission revealed that it was in the final stages of an investigation
of another five cases in Aceh. However they have decided to suspend further
work till the government shows that it is serious in responding to them.
"We've almost completed the inquiries, but we halted the work because we
feel it's useless. The government doesn't seem to appreciate our work,"
Rosita said.
However,
unlike the previous five, these cases include attacks on both civilians
and security forces. They are -- the shooting of protesters in front of
the South Aceh Police headquarters on Sept. 11, 1999; the shooting of civilians
in front of Samadua Police Subprecinct in South Aceh on November 10, 1999;
the attack on Mobile Police Brigade personnel at Gunung Geurutee on December
19, 1999 in Sajeun village in Aceh Besar and on December 20, 1999 in Mareuhum
Daya village in West Aceh; the killing of military personnel on December
29, 1998, in Lhok Nibong, East Aceh; and the Peudada incident on May 25,
1999 in which a medical military team was killed in an ambush.
"We
surely cannot continue with these five cases, if the government is not
serious in following up with the ones we've completed," Rosita said.
Apart
from the Sujdono case, there have also been questions surrounding the death
of legislator Tengku Nashiruddin Daud, found dead earlier this month in
Sibolangit, North Sumatra, reportedly after being abducted.
National
Police Lt. Gen. Roesdihardjo said here on Tuesday that Julizar, described
as a member of the Information Center for Aceh Referendum (SIRA), has been
declared as a suspect in the murder.
But
in Banda Aceh, the chief of SIRA's presidium, Muhammad Nazar, denied on
Tuesday that Julizar was a member. "We will ask for further clarification
from the police because their statement is nonsense," Nazar said, while
stressing that Julizar is not a SIRA activist.
"He
[Julizar] once participated in a SIRA congress in February last year as
representative of the United Development Party (PPP)," Nazar recounted
of the group's only connection with the suspect. Nazar claimed that police
were merely "looking for a scapegoat" in naming the group.
House
of Representatives Speaker Akbar Tandjung recently suggested that politics
may be behind the Nashiruddin murder as he was a member of a House special
commission tasked with the probe of past atrocities in Aceh.
Irianese's
life expectancy only 40 years
Jakarta
Post - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- The life expectancy of the Irianese is about 40 years, the shortest
among ethnic groups in Indonesia, due to malnutrition and a poor health
service, a senior local official says.
"Reaching
the age of 40, let alone 50, is an extraordinary divine reward," Decky
Asmuruf, chief of the Irian Jaya provincial office for social affairs,
told Antara in Jayapura last week. According to the United Nation's Development
Program's (UNDP) 1999 Human Development Report, life expectancy in Indonesia
as a whole is 65.1.
Asmuruf
attributed the untimely deaths in Irian Jaya to widespread malnutrition
and common chronic diseases like malaria, respiratory problems, tuberculosis,
leprosy and skin diseases. Malnutrition and poor medical care are complicated
problems for the cash-strapped Irian Jaya provincial government. Tribespeople
living in isolated areas lack adequate health facilities. The life expectancy
is also attributed to the high rates of infant and maternal mortality in
indigenous peoples in the hinterland.
Asmuruf
warned that unless the central government in Jakarta did something to reverse
the situation, Irian Jaya would see its indigenous population shrink every
year. The high mortality rate in Irian Jaya has resulted in an increasingly
large number of orphan children. "Just imagine, with a population of only
2.3 million, Irian Jaya has 76,779 orphans," he said. "Most of the children
live a miserable life because their parents died young." At present, the
local government accommodates only 17,340 orphans in orphanages and with
foster parents.
Statistics
at the social affairs office show that Irian Jaya has 11,900 people with
physical disabilities, 38,092 unemployed women and 2,720 prostitutes. "The
unemployed women are mostly at their productive ages. It is feared that
they will turn to prostitution if they cannot get employment," Asmuruf
said.
Police,
military chiefs among 3 dead in Aceh
Agence
France-Presse - February 15, 2000
Bandah
Aceh -- A police chief, a military subdistrict chief and a policeman were
shot dead by unknown gunmen today in the latest attacks on security officers
in Indonesia's restive Aceh province, police said here.
Second
Lieutenant Cut Ajad, the police chief of the Kluet Selatan subprecinct,
was killed in an ambush by gunmen in the village of Pulo Ie while patrolling
in a car, Aceh police spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Sayed Husaini was quoted
as saying.
Two
other police were injured in an exchnage of fire during the incident, Husaini
said, adding one of the wounded had died later in hospital.
"The
group were in Ayi village, about four kilometers from police headquarters,
when the armed group opened fire," Husaini said. "Police chief Ajad died
on the spot, and Sergeant Major Hayat died in hospital."
Gunmen
struck again today shooting dead Captain Muhammad Lara, the head of the
military command in Darul Imamah subdistrict early in the afternoon on
the outskirts of the provincial capital of Banda Aceh, Lietenant Colonel
Ira Suparmo of the local military command said. Lara had been on his way
home to Paseu Beutong district, he said,
Yesterday
Second Lieutenant Djamil Yahya, the head of Mutiara police subdistrict,
was shot by an unidentified man when he was riding a motorcycle near a
market in Pidie district, police said. All the victims Sunday and Monday
were natives of Aceh, residents said.
Workers
demand better working conditions
Green
Left Weekly - February 16, 2000
February
11, 500 workers from clothing manufacturer PT Matahari Sentosa I in Bandung,
West Java, staged a sit-in at the parliament building here. The workers,
members of the militant Indonesian National Front for Labour Struggle (FNPBI)
trade union, were demanding a 100% wage increase from their present daily
pay of 7700 rupiah. This does not cover their living costs, which have
increased more than 200% in recent months.
The
day before, together with workers from Kahatex and Primatex in Bandung,
West Java, the unionists protested at the local parliament building.
PT
Matahari Sentosa I, one of Indonesia's largest garment factories, produces
clothes for export to the United States, Europe and Australia. Among the
workers other demands were the end of military and police involvement in
the political system (the dual function of the military), that workers
be allowed to join unions other than the government-approved All Indonesian
Trade Unions (SPSI), and the abolition of racist discrimination on the
job. The workers reported that promotions are given only to people based
on their ethnic background.
The
demand for the end of the dual functions of the military has arisen from
the workers' daily experiences. Soldiers intimidate workers at the factory
who gather for political and union discussions.
One
worker at the Jakarta protest, Nasro, told Green Left Weekly: "In my work
place, management hired police from the special mobile brigade [known as
Brimob] to be field supervisors. In this way, the company can control the
workers.
There
is no way for us to talk to each other. We also have to face attacks [from
them] whenever we try to `escape' from the factory to give solidarity to
other workers on strike or to protest to government representatives or
local parliamentarians."
Nasro
also reported that police and members of the local military had intimidated
workers not to leave for the Jakarta protest. Some workers were scared
and did not leave.
The
PT Matahari Sentosa I workers' struggle has been a prolonged one, with
the first protests taking place a year ago. After a week-long strike that
ended on February 23 last year, the company and workers signed two agreements
that contained important improvements in working conditions, such as a
Rp1000 meal allowance, the provision of transportation and uniforms, awards
for diligent workers and the creation of a health and safety facility within
one year. The agreements have yet to be implemented.
Leaders
of the protest in Jakarta asked to meet members of the parliamentary commission
which deals with labour issues. No commission members were prepared to
meet the workers, except Yakob from Indonesian Democratic Party-Struggle
(PDI-P), who is also chairperson of SPSI.
However,
Yakob asked the workers to leave because it would be hard to get the company
to negotiate. The workers then asked to speak to the minister of labour
power. "I voted for PDI-P in the last election", one worker, Heri, said,
"but a person like Yakob does not seriously support our struggle".
Missing
persons' reports flood rights office
Jakarta
Post - February 18, 2000 (abridged)
Bandung
-- The newly created Office of the State Minister of Human Rights Affairs
has received some 3,000 reports of missing persons, most of them alleged
abductions in Aceh, East Timor and Jakarta.
The
office's third deputy, Asmar Oemar Saleh, said on Thursday the missing
persons' reports were part of a total of 4,000 submitted to the office
in the past three and a half months.
Speaking
at a human rights seminar at Padjadjaran University, Asmar said there were
restrictions on how his office could pursue investigation of the reports.
"Unfortunately,
we haven't been able to cope with the reports as the government has not
yet come up with a policy to handle cases of missing persons," Asmar said.
"Moreover, most of the cases were quite vague and did not have clear leads."
He said many of the disappearances occurred a long time ago.
"We
haven't got any clear answers from both the governments of Soeharto and
Habibie about these cases, which occurred during their tenure." To address
the institutional problems and lack of legal instruments to tackle the
reports, Asmar said the ministry would hold a symposium next month to gather
opinions on policies to handle the missing persons' cases.
In
a related development, the coordinator of the Commission for Missing Persons
and Victims of Violence (Kontras), Munir, supported previous claims that
the disappearance of Lt. Col. Sudjono, a suspect in a mass shooting in
Aceh, occurred to "eliminate the link to his commanding officers". "Sudjono
was supposed to be protected as a key suspect and witness by the Indonesian
Military (TNI) commander and the attorney general. But now they don't know
his whereabouts. It's utterly puzzling.
"The
authorities must take responsibility and take concrete steps. Don't just
say that he deserted." He added that Kontras was also ready to provide
legal counsel to Sudjono's family because he presumably "went missing against
his will".
Munir
said several Kontras activists were searching for Sudjono in cities such
as Banda Aceh, Medan and ones in West Java, but to no avail. Munir contended
that Sudjono should be termed a "key witness" rather than a "suspect" because
his actions resulted from orders from his commanders.
Sudjono
was allegedly involved in the shooting death of religious teacher Tengku
Bantaqiah, his wife, his students and dozens of farmers last year. A government-sanctioned
inquiry in December concluded they were killed by soldiers.
Munir
conceded that in processing and uncovering human rights cases, priority
was given to cases with higher political or public visibility. "East Timor
has the top priority because it concerns the fate of high-ranking officers
threatened with a military tribunal. While Aceh does not have such urgency."
Protest
rally at Jakarta airport
Jakarta
Post - February 20, 2000
Tangerang
-- Traffic heading to and from the Soekarno-Hatta International Airport
here was blocked for at least three hours on Saturday afternoon by some
300 angry protesters, causing delays of several international and domestic
flights.
None
of the protesters, believed to have been upset after being banned from
running illegal businesses at the airport, were arrested by the police.
Tangerang Police chief Lt. Col. Pudji Hartanto Iskandar said four of them,
identified as Udin, Basuki, Soleh, and Rubiah, were only questioned.
Airport
records showed that the delayed international flights included those leaving
for Hong Kong, Riyadh, Singapore, and Taipei. The domestic ones included
those with end-point destinations of Padang in West Sumatra, Pekanbaru
in Riau, Pontianak in West Kalimantan and Semarang in Central Java.
Witnesses
said that the protesters, mostly residents living near the vast airport
complex, started to occupy the entrance gate outside the airport's premises
at the toll road to Jakarta, from midday until 4pm. They allowed no vehicles,
including the Damri airport buses, to pass through, causing a traffic jam
kilometers in length.
A couple,
who witnessed the blockade, said that some of the vehicles, whose drivers
decided to pass through, were pelted by stones. But officer Pudji insisted
that no such incident happened during the protesters' barricade. He said
the people finally dispersed after police threatened repressive action
against them.
Detik.com
reported that the protesters stopped the blockade and abruptly sprinted
to different directions after witnessing the arrival of a troop of the
police elite Mobile Brigade.
When
asked about the protesters' demands, the officer refused to comment, saying
that his duty was to keep the airport safe. "You should contact the officials
of Angkasa Pura II [the airport operator] as it was their internal affair,"
he said, Head of the airport operator branch, Arifin Razak, was unable
to be reached and no company officials were willing to give comments.
However,
a well-informed police officer at the scene said it was an old dispute
between the company and the local residents. "The residents protested Angkasa
Pura's recent raid against them and their business at the airport premises
in which they were driven from the airport compound," the officer said
under the condition of anonymity.
The
residents, he said, usually flock the airport to work as unofficial parking
attendants, car washers, and food sellers. The airport authorities, he
added, had to finally ban these people following complaints from many passengers.
It has been reported in the press on several occasions that the illegal
workers often forced people to use and pay for their service.
After
disbursing them the first time, Angkasa Pura allowed them back to their
businesses and even distributed free T-shirts to them after the residents
pledged to organize themselves.
Once,
the firm also offered some amount of money and vocational training for
the residents to start small-scale businesses instead of working in the
airport. "But it seemed that the residents prefer fast money instead of
having their own businesses," he added. When conditions returned again
to a state of disorder, the company decided to expel all of them.
Passengers
at the international airport had long complained about the presence of
the people, as they often caused discomfort. The airport is also noted
for the crowd of unauthorized people who act as ticket agents and brokers
for unlicensed taxis, often following the passengers, particularly women.
Annan
winds up a protest- peppered visit
Agence
France-Presse - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- UN Secretary General Kofi Annan wound up a protest- peppered, two-day
visit to Indonesia Wednesday urging the government not to use force against
separatist rebels and warning Jakarta to bring East Timor rights abusers
to trial or face UN action.
Annan
was scheduled to head early Thursday to East Timor, on what UN staff there
have described as an intensely personally- important trip for the man instrumental
in sanctioning the dispatch of UN troops there.
His
last appointment in Jakarta was a dinner at the palace with President Abdurrahman
Wahid, Vice President Megawati Sukarnoputri and senior cabinet ministers.
In
a back-breaking schedule involving calls on ministers, human rights bodies,
and the president, Annan's message remained the same -- Indonesia must
bring those responsible for the wave of murder, arson and forced deportations
in East Timor to trial. And if it does not, the UN Security Council will
move to set up an international war crimes tribunal.
Not
all Indonesians were happy with the message. A small but vocal group of
15 protestors dogged Annan as he visited the headquarters of the National
Human Rights Commission headquarters, where some 75 police stood guard.
Shouting
for him stop "playing Rambo," the 15 students, from the nationalist Forum
for Upholding the Nation's Sovereignty stood behind a banner reading "We're
happy you came to Indonesia, but we'd rather you were back in New York."
Waving a placard showing Annan as a Rambo figure with the slogan "America's
ally," they said Indonesia had the right to defend its own country and
accused the rights commission of "prosecuting people who are innocent."
A special
team from the commission has recommended the attorney general's office
here probe 33 people, including six top generals, for last year's atrocities
in East Timor.
After
meeting Wahid earlier, Annan warned the Security Council would have the
right to convene an international war crimes tribunal if those guilty of
involvement in the East Timor violence were not tried in Indonesia. It
was the bluntest statement yet made here by Annan, who has so far praised
Jakarta's efforts to investigate the violence. "Of course if that doesn't
happen the council has the right to refer it to [an international tribunal],"
he said. "We are all aware that the government has begun a judicial process
to make [sure] ... those who are responsible for the violence are brought
to justice and I think that process is taking its course," he said.
In
a speech later to the Indonesian Council of World Affairs Annan sought
to allay fears that the United Nations was pro- separatist.
He
also urged Jakarta to forsake the use of force against two virulent separatist
movements in the provinces of Irian Jaya and Aceh. "It may well feel to
some of you as if Indonesia's very existence is under attack from covert
forces which believe the country is too large, and want to break it up,"
Annan said. But separatist movements "are political problems, and as such
... require political solutions."
Since
East Timor gained independence from Indonesia last year through a UN-organized
ballot, Jakarta has been adamant it will not bow to the demands of separatists
in Irian Jaya and Aceh.
On
Tuesday police violently broke up a crowd pelting the UN mission here with
eggs and tomatoes, blaming Annan for the loss of East Timor. The same day
police blocked two busloads of Irian Jayans, trying to reach Annan to ask
for help in their separatist cause, and on Wednesday some 100 Acehnese
students asked his help to talk to the government to halt the violence
there.
In
a petition to Annan, the protestors urged the UN to send a task force to
Aceh to establish a "relief zone" -- an area declared free of intervention
by both the separatist Free Aceh Movement (GAM) and the Indonesian military.
A decade
of harsh military crackdowns against the rebels left 5,000 children orphaned
and 2,000 women widowed in Aceh, a staunchly Muslim province on the northern
tip of Sumatra island.
"Please
do not think ... the United Nations is predisposed in favour of separatism,
or that its purpose is to break up large states into smaller ones. On the
contrary, the purpose of the United Nations is to enable peoples to live
together without conflict," he said.
Wiranto
turns radio DJ day after suspension
Associated
Press - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- A day after he was removed as senior government minister, Gen. Wiranto
dropped into a popular Jakarta radio station and became their disc jockey
for more than an hour, news reports said Wednesday.
The
former military chief, an avid karaoke singer who recently listed his hobbies
as music and body building, flirted on the phone with a local movie star
and played several rock 'n' roll songs on Radio M97-FM, Kompas newspaper
reported. "I was just driving around and thought I'd stop by," Wiranto
reportedly told listeners after coming on air on Tuesday.
The
four-star general's music tastes run to classic rock, Queen, Led Zeppelin
and Jimi Hendrix. Indonesia's President Abdurrahman Wahid suspended Wiranto
from his Cabinet on Monday. Wahid said he wanted the four-star general
to have time to concentrate on defending himself in the face of allegations
that he, as Indonesia's military chief when pro-Jakarta militias went on
a violent rampage in East Timor last year, should be held accountable for
the murder and destruction.
"I
am well, no problem," Wiranto said, responding to a listener who asked
him how he was after being suspended. "I think the problem will be resolved."
At
the height of the violence in East Timor in September last year, Wiranto
publicly sang Feelings, the 1975 hit popularized by Paul Williams.
Radio
M97-FM's program director Ella Suid said the station, which specializes
in oldies, was shocked when Wiranto arrived unannounced. "He was not invited,
he just came," she said. "We then invited him to be a guest on the talk
show program but he wanted to do it all himself."
Wiranto's
radio debut came amid market rumors that he wasn't satisfied with being
ousted from the Cabinet. Rumors that there would be some form of reaction
from the military weighed on Jakarta stocks and the rupiah Wednesday, despite
the fact that senior military and government officials have repeatedly
dismissed any chance of a coup or other form of concerted military action
against the government.
Probe
on PDI HQs attack to take 3 months
Jakarta
Post - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- National Police chief Lt. Gen. Rusdihardjo vowed on Tuesday that the
police would take up to three months, to complete an investigation into
the July 27, 1996 bloody takeover of the Indonesian Democratic Party (PDI)
headquarters.
"We
have started the investigation and we hope to finish it in three months,"
Rusdihardjo said in a hearing with the House of Representatives Commission
I for defense and security, foreign affairs, information, and legal affairs.
The
police, he said, were now collecting new evidence in connection with the
bloody incident at the party's headquarters on Jl. Diponegoro, Central
Jakarta, on July 27, 1996. The takeover was conducted by the party's splinter
group led by Soerjadi, which was backed by elements in the former Indonesian
Armed Forces (ABRI).
The
takeover triggered the sympathy of residents throughout the city, many
becoming involved in massive unrest in support of then party chairwoman
Megawati Soekarnoputri. The unrest resulted in the deaths of at least five
people and injury to 149 others. Meanwhile, 23 people caught in the midst
of the incident are still missing.
Rusdihardjo's
statement was made in response to comments made by legislator A. Effendy
Choirie of the National Awakening Party (PKB), who asked the police chief
to give a deadline for completion of the investigation. "The police must
be able resolve this case, and not follow the steps of the former police
chief, who only spoke and never showed any results," Effendy told reporters
after the hearing.
Separately,
the National Police on Tuesday morning called a closed meeting of National
Police detectives and intelligence officers, to decide which civilians
and police officers would be summoned.
The
meeting was led by assistant to National Police chief for intelligence
affairs, Maj. Gen. Guntur Sumastopo. "We should have the complete list
by Wednesday latest. So far, it includes the names of (former Central Jakarta
police chief) Col. Aboebakar Nataprawira, (former Jakarta Police chief)
Maj. Gen. Hamami Nata, (former National Police chief) Gen. Dibyo Widodo
and (former PDI secretary-general) Buttu R. Hutapea," Col. Saleh Saaf of
the National Police information department told The Jakarta Post.
Saleh
refused to comment on whether the list would include the names of former
city military commander, Governor Sutiyoso, a retired lieutenant general
who opted for civilian status, and former ABRI chief of social and political
affairs Lt. Syarwan Hamid, who is a retired lieutenant general. "We'll
see later... let's not discuss them now," Saleh said.
Following
the takeover, Megawati established the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle
(PDI Perjuangan) and won last year's General Elections with 34 percent
of total votes.
The
demand to reopen the 27 July case was triggered by President Abdurrahman
Wahid's statement on former minister of defense and security/Indonesian
Armed Forces commander Gen. (ret.) Feisal Tanjung, whom he accused as the
one responsible for the takeover. Earlier, Abdurrahman said that Feisal
tried "to eliminate" him as chairman of the Nahdlatul Ulama Muslim organization,
and Megawati as the party chairwoman. Feisal has denied the accusations,
but admitted that TNI had financed the PDI congress in Medan, North Sumatra,
two months before the takeover.
The
1996 government-sponsored PDI congress in the North Sumatra capital of
Medan named Soerjadi as the party's chairman, replacing Megawati, who was
said to be incapable of solving the party's internal problems.
This
led to the July 27 takeover of PDI headquarters, which was still occupied
by Megawati and her supporters. Like the ongoing investigation of the 27
July incident, legislator Effendy said that deadlines were also needed
for ongoing investigations into the murders of labor activist Marsinah
in Surabaya, East Java, and the Yogyakarta-based journalist, Muhammad Syafruddin
alias Udin.
Victor
is a victim in liberty's triumph
New
York Times - February 13, 2000
Seth
Mydans, Jakarta -- In the nearly two years since Indonesia's strongman,
Suharto, stepped down in May 1998, it is the press that has been the most
free, and the most tumultuous, of Indonesia's institutions. It has been
the fundamental underpinning for the continuing move toward a democratic
society.
But
in some ways today it is also a victim, not just a protagonist, in the
liberation -- and disorder -- it has helped unleash. Its condition reveals
a lot about the chaotic freedoms of the new Indonesia, where the harsh
hand of the dictator has often given way to the unpredictable passions
of the mob.
In
many arenas the rules that governed, and often stifled, the nation have
been eased or removed or simply ignored. As a result -- as in many newly
liberated nations -- Indonesia's road from repression to democracy is wild
and uncertain.
This
week, the focus of change is on the military, with President Abdurrahman
Wahid returning Sunday from a foreign trip to confront his most prominent
general, Wiranto, who has so far refused the president's demand to resign.
The
general, accused of human rights abuses, represents the old guard that,
under Suharto, saw itself as standard bearer and enforcer of a top-down
regime known for corruption, repression, and the silencing of dissent.
Since
Suharto's fall, the military has been retreating under the pressure of
a popular demand for civilian rule. But its new weakness in the eyes of
society comes with a social cost: It has contributed to the uncertainties
and instabilities the nation faces.
"At
the present moment," said Susanto Pudjosumatono, chief editor of the daily
Jakarta Post, "who cares about the law? Street justice is the order of
the day. Mobs deal with thieves and burglars. Police are caught red-handed
as burglars. Villagers loot estates. Communal conflicts are flaring. People
resort to violence to settle disputes."
This
is the arena in which the press now operates. Freed of the fear of arrest
or the closure of their newspapers, editors no longer censor themselves
to please authorities. But self- censorship is alive among editors of newspapers
both big and small. It is the mob they fear.
When
Christian churches were burned on the island of Lombok recently, one newspaper,
sidestepping the religious conflict, declined to identify them, calling
them blandly "houses of worship."
When
mobs demonstrated in the eastern Indonesian city of Ujungpandang late last
year, local editors said they refrained from revealing the instigators
for fear that the mobs would turn on them as well.
In
the central Javanese city of Solo, the most devastated city in the huge
riots of early 1998, armed thugs have threatened reporters in their newsroom.
Even
in the capital, Jakarta, not long ago, a mob protested outside the offices
of Tempo, the nation's leading magazine, vandalizing vehicles.
Clear
and professional reporting can be the most difficult in the places where
it is most needed, places like Ambon and Aceh where separatist or communal
conflicts threaten to touch off a nationwide backlash.
Bambang
Harimukti, the editor of Tempo, said that to assure that his reports are
complete and unbiased he must consider sending in non-local staff members
who leave the area as soon as their reporting is done. "It is not the authorities
wielding their power who are the biggest threat anymore," Susanto said.
"Now the clear and present danger comes from the people."
In
this unstable arena, the press has played a crucial role in keeping the
country's political and social evolution more or less on course. As an
independent institution, its reforms came quickly, leading the way into
a new atmosphere of openness. "With all the changes we've seen, the press
is perhaps Indonesia's most transformed institution," said Warief Djajanto,
an executive at the Indonesian news agency, Antara.
In
the first 18 months after Suharto stepped down, 1,500 press licenses were
issued by the liberal-minded new minister of information, Yunus Yosfiah.
Then, under a new press law passed last fall, the requirement for licenses
was abolished. Nobody knows now how many newspapers and radio stations
have joined the babble around the nation, but they have contributed to
a brand new sense that anything goes.
The
best of the newspapers offer serious political reporting and analysis,
investigations of corruption and military abuses, high-stakes policy debates
and fundamental explorations of new directions for Indonesia.
But
with so many new outlets, the country suffers from a crippling shortage
of trained journalists and much of what is printed and aired lacks fundamental
elements of accuracy and fairness.
With
so few resources, some small newspapers do not even pay their reporters.
They simply issue them press cards and leave them to seek whatever fees
and payoffs they can earn from their sources. "When we organize training
for young reporters, many lack professionalism both in journalistic competence
and in ethical competence," Susanto said.
Defense
Minister Juwono Sudarsono, in a recent interview, complained of widespread
tabloid journalism. "We have a vigorous press but it is often a vigorous
and irresponsible press," he said. "A lot of hopes have been placed in
the press but I don't think these hopes have been fulfilled."
Perhaps
those hopes were too high at this early stage. Without the free press,
flawed as it is, Indonesia might have made far less progress than it has.
When
Suharto was president, just about every institution in Indonesia had one
thing in common: from the courts to the bureaucracy to the military to
the press, they were tailored to serve his interests. When he departed,
he left intact a venal and self-serving legislature, a power-hungry military
and a thoroughgoing culture of corruption that, without the pressure of
an overwhelming popular will, might well have reverted to their old ways.
They
never had a chance. Suddenly, political talk shows filled the airwaves,
an unfiltered puree of wisdom and nonsense. But at their heart was a powerful
momentum for change.
Big
names probed over forestry funds
Jakarta
Post - February 17, 2000
Jakarta
-- A team of seven prosecutors from the Attorney General's Office are investigating
the alleged misuse of reforestation funds by five major figures linked
to former president Soeharto.
Minister
of Forestry and Plantations Nur Mahmudi Isma'il said on Wednesday the misuse
of reforestation funds totaling some Rp 784 billion reportedly involved
the former president's close friend Mohamad "Bob" Hasan, his eldest daugther
Siti Hardijanti "Tutut" Rukmana, his half brother Probosutedjo and his
other friends Prajogo Pangestu and Ibrahim Risjad.
"The
prosecutors will prove the allegations and decide whether the culprits
should be charged under criminal or civil law," he said on the sidelines
of a hearing with House of Representatives Commission III for agriculture
and food affairs.
The
report said Prajogo and Soeharto's eldest daughter Tutut, who controlled
some stakes at industrial forest estate developer PT Musi Hutan Persada
in South Sumatra, had allegedly manipulated particular documents regarding
the size of the company's 193,500 hectares in order to obtain more reforestation
funds. Prajogo and Tutut allegedly misused about Rp 346.87 billion of reforestation
funds.
The
report alleged that Probosutedjo was given special treatment by then president
Soeharto and the minister of state secretary in obtaining more reforestation
funds. Probosutedjo allegedly manipulated some Rp 144.40 billion of reforestation
funds he received through his industrial forest owner PT Menara Hutan Buana,
which controls about 268,885 hectares of area in South Kalimantan.
The
report also alleged that Soeharto's golf buddy, Mohamad "Bob" Hasan, had
allegedly misused Rp 207.81 billion in reforestation funds he received
for his industrial forest estate PT Surya Hutani Jaya.
Businessman
Ibrahim Risjad allegedly used the reforestation funds of Rp 85.36 billion
assigned by the government for his industrial forest developer PT Aceh
Nusa Indrapuri to, among other things, purchase space at the Menara Batavia
building, according to the report.
Developers
of industrial forest estates are allowed to obtain reforestation funds
from the government to finance their forestry projects as cheap loans.
But many used the funds for other business purposes and some even marked
up the size of their estates to get larger funds. Nur Mahmudi said that
in line with the ministry's commitment to curb corruption and other misconduct
in the forestry sector his office had temporarily suspended 46 forest concession
contracts due to alleged flawed documents and improper management by the
logging operations. "They may resume operation after our investigation
has proven that they did not violate any regulations," he said.
Nur
Mahmudi added that his office had also considered investigating plantation
firm PT Tanjung Lingga in Central Kalimantan, which is owned by Abdul Rasyid,
a member of the People's Consultative Assembly, over allegations of illegal
logging. "Illegal logging practices have definitely taken place in the
plantation area. We have received some reports about it. But we have to
prove it first before making any decisions," he said.
The
management of Tanjung Lingga was recently accused by local environmental
group Telapak Indonesia for threatening its director Ruwindrijarto and
an expert from the Environmental Investigation Agency, Faith Brunskill,
during their visit to the plantation area in January. Tanjung Lingga's
Abdul Rasyid has strongly denied the accusation and has instead charged
the two environmentalists with trespassing on his property.
US
resumes training army officers
Washington
Post - February 19, 2000
Rajiv
Chandrasekaran, Jakarta -- The Defense Department has quietly resumed training
Indonesian military officers in the United States, restoring one element
of its relationship with Indonesia that was suspended last year after Indonesian
soldiers participated in the violence that engulfed East Timor.
The
training program is small, involving only seven Indonesian officers. But
US officials said it was restarted without fanfare to avoid criticism on
Capitol Hill and among human rights groups, which argue that Indonesian
government-supported militias are still discouraging refugees from returning
to newly independent minded East Timor.
US
officials stressed that they have not resumed full military-to-military
relations and warned that the training program will not be continued if
the Indonesian military does not actively deal with the refugee problem
and other issues.
Nevertheless,
US officials said they are heartened by Indonesia's efforts to reform its
armed forces since the country's first democratically elected president,
Abdurrahman Wahid, took office in October.
The
country now has a civilian defense minister, a respected former academic
who is trying to ferret out corruption and extricate the military from
politics. The government also is investigating dozens of military officers
-- including the now- suspended armed forces chief, Gen. Wiranto -- for
human rights abuses in East Timor. The attorney general this week promised
suspects will be brought to trial within three months. "There have been
some very positive strides," said a US official here. "The determination
was made that this would be a good first step."
The
official said the training program was not resumed as a quid pro quo for
specific Indonesian military reforms. But Washington has been pleased with
many of the changes -- particularly Wahid's decision this week to suspend
Wiranto during the human rights investigation -- and is hoping resumption
of training will serve as an incentive to follow through with other reforms.
Defense
Minister Juwono Sudarsono said in an interview that cooperation with the
United States will help his efforts to change the Indonesian military.
"We need all of this management training," Juwono said. "We are trying
to become a people's army that respects civilian control."
Political
analysts had feared that Wahid's effort to suspend Wiranto might result
in a military backlash and possibly a coup d'etat. But many top armed forces
officers publicly threw their support behind the president.
Juwono
said the "principle of civilian control" now is "firmly entrenched" among
soldiers. But he worried that "the substance of it still has to be worked
out." "Our civil society is still very weak," he said.
The
country's 500,000-strong armed forces has long boasted a "dual function"
role in Indonesian society, involving itself in virtually every aspect
of political and business life. The military, for instance, had been allotted
a number of seats in parliament and certain top civil-service posts, and
it has been involved in a vast array of business ventures from construction
to pharmaceutical and textile production.
Juwono
said he will soon begin to thin the ranks of senior generals and promote
junior officers committed to civilian military leadership. "I've told my
generals that the party's over," he said.
The
violence in East Timor, which was prompted by the territory's overwhelming
vote in August to separate from Indonesia, led the US government to suspend
arms sales and all military-to-military contacts. At the time, 18 Indonesian
military officers were in the United States participating in the International
Military Education and Training Program.
Eleven
of them returned to Indonesia, but seven had been staying in the United
States, waiting to resume classes. The officers went back to their classes
in mid-January.
Military's
role in economy will be hard to reduce
Asia
Pulse - February 17, 2000
Jakarta
-- It will much longer to reduce the Indonesian military's influence on
the economy than on politics or government, an observer said.
"Stopping
the military's role in the legislative body or the cabinet is now feasible.
But stopping [it] in the economic field will take a longer time," Ikrar
Nusa Bhakti, a researcher from the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI),
said Wednesday.
Speaking
in a discussion organized by the Study-Action Forum for Indonesian Democracy,
Ikrar questioned the military's businesses through various foundations
and cooperatives. "Most of the businesses are no longer directed to step
up the welfare of the military personnel, but dedicated to the affluence
of some generals," he noted.
According
to him, the Indonesian military's involvement in business began during
the reign of Soekarno and came to dominance during the three decades of
Soeharto's rule.
During
the process of nationalization of big businesses left behind by the Dutch
colonial rule in 1956-57, Ikrar said, there had been fierce competition
for assets control between the military and the then Indonesian Communist
Party (PKI).
President
Soekarno finally allowed military, particularly the Army, to manage a few
business establishments. It was during this time that the military started
to invite Chinese businessmen to cooperate in managing the businesses.
Following
the ascent of Soeharto to power, the military got a greater opportunity
in business. Chinese businessmen then sought cooperation individually,
and some generals became backers to various business undertakings. "The
generals' involvement in business is still going on," he said.
According
to Ikrar, the state would need the right plan if it were to eliminate the
military's role in business. "The civilian circle should be willing to
negotiate with the military about appropriate compensation if the latter
is to relinquish its control over all business assets," Ikrar said.
Under
attack at home, military reels
New
York Times - February 11, 2000
Seth
Mydans, Jakarta -- Perhaps the most telling insult to Indonesia's armed
forces, people here say, is that mothers no longer encourage their daughters
to marry a military man.
"They
used to tell us: 'Marry a soldier. You'll have money and prestige,'" said
a young woman who recently graduated from college. "Now not so much. We
are all hearing too many bad things about the military."
From
the earliest years of the nation, half a century ago, there was no prouder
profession in Indonesia than to be a member of the military, a "son of
the revolution" and "guardian of the nation." Manipulated by former President
Suharto into a mainstay of his 32 years of rule, the armed forces became
Indonesia's most powerful and privileged institution, effectively running
the country, from small villages to major government ministries.
And
in the service of the president, as well as their own personal and economic
interests, they employed the force of arms with impunity. As the joke had
it, if someone steps on your toe in the bus, you say to him: "Are you a
member of the military? If not, please get off my toe."
The
shift in popular perception has been swift. With the forced resignation
of Mr. Suharto nearly two years ago and the powerful momentum of a nationwide
reform movement, the military is retreating in disarray from its commanding
position in society. And like any cornered fighter, some officers are snarling
in dangerous defiance.
On
Sunday, President Abdurrahman Wahid is to return from a two-week foreign
trip during which the country's most prominent general, Wiranto, refused
his demand to resign as coordinating minister for security affairs. The
general's defiance touched off rumors of a coup. And while that now seems
unlikely -- with the general and the president expected to talk out the
situation face-to-face -- the resistance of parts of the military to civilian
command is now an open issue.
The
humiliation of a once-proud -- once-arrogant -- institution poses serious
risks for Indonesia. A scattered and fractious archipelago of 210 million
people, it has relied on its armed force of 350,000, rather than on democratic
processes, to maintain national unity.
More
than ever today, many political analysts agree, there is a need for security
forces to calm the explosions of religious and ethnic conflict that have
spread in this time of national transition and weak central government.
While
the current military may not be able to play that role, it also cannot
be recreated or pushed out of public life overnight. "It's dangerous to
ask the military to completely withdraw from the political arena," said
Amien Rais, the speaker of Parliament, who has been an advocate of military
reform. "We must give it time."
With
its top generals branded war criminals abroad and facing human rights investigations
at home, with the president taunting restive officers as "cowards," and
with the history of their abuses literally being exhumed from mass graves,
Indonesia's military is at its lowest point. "In the country's contemporary
history the military has never been so humiliated and disrespected by civilians,"
said Hermawan Sulistyo, a political commentator.
While
some officers remain defiant, some are offering elaborate statements of
contrition. "I would like to apologize for past military violence and I
call on the people to stop condemning the military," Maj. Gen. Agus Wirahadikusumah,
a regional commander, said recently. "Give us a chance to restore our image
and if necessary troops who are used to the practices of the past regime
will have to be brainwashed."
Indeed,
the gap between generals like this and the poorly trained, poorly paid
soldiers they command is a deep one, said Dewi Fortuna Anwar, a political
analyst who was a top aide to former President B. J. Habibie. "Most of
the people on the ground have a very narrow interpretation of nationalism,"
she said. "For a lot of them, nationalism means going around with a red-and-
white band around their head and doing horrible things to people." Red
and white are the colors of the Indonesian flag.
Many
other officers express bewilderment, said Salim Said, a prominent expert
on military affairs. Criticized from all sides for doing what they believed
to be their job, pressed to withdraw from politics without a thank you,
they now are uncertain of their mission.
Oddly,
he said, little has been done legislatively to redefine the proper role
of the military; the institution has been expected to create its own reforms.
"I had dinner with a general last night," Mr. Salim said, "and he told
me: 'What is important for us is the confidence to do our job. We need
to know what is allowed and what is not allowed today. Because we do not
want to end up like our superiors who were doing their jobs in East Timor
and then were accused of human rights violations.' "
Allegations
of military abuses in East Timor are at the heart of the military's problems
today, although they are not the first or the only arena in which the military
faces criticism.
Last
week, separate investigations by an Indonesian government panel and by
the United Nations found five top generals -- including General Wiranto
-- at fault for the violence and destruction that followed East Timor's
vote for independence from Indonesia last August.
Mr.
Wahid immediately called on General Wiranto to resign. The general says
he wants to make his case directly to the president before deciding what
to do, and the president has begun to talk vaguely about promising him
an eventual pardon if he is tried and convicted of war crimes.
But
looking around them as they face this challenge from a newly confident
civilian government, military officers have found few expressions of public
support.
What
is most dangerous, say some local analysts, is the possibility of a backlash
by at least some elements of the military as they realize how isolated
they have become and see their economic power and social privileges threatened.
Indeed,
many analysts believe that disaffected officers may be instigating much
of the current unrest in an attempt to preserve their local power or destabilize
the central government.
And
yet, unpopular as it may have become, the military remains an essential
fixture in Indonesian society. Juwono Sudarsono, a major symbol of reform
as the country's first civilian defense minister in 40 years, noted recently
that the civilian government was still not ready to take over the broad
political and administrative functions the military has performed.
In
an interview, he called the armed forces "the most organized, or at least
the least disorganized, of all the disorganized elements in society." Earlier,
he warned publicly: "If civilian leaders are not able to develop a healthy
and independent political life, then we will sooner or later return to
a military-dominated role just like in Pakistan and some African states.
"So objectively, as an observer and not as a minister, I have to say that
at least for the next 10 years turmoil is still unavoidable here, although
it would not be as frequent and severe as we expected."
Even
with the constitutional and legal status of the military still unchanged
and its powerful regional commands still exercising local control, its
influence has been steadily whittled away over the last year or more.
Its
parliamentary voting bloc has been cut in half, to 38 seats. Its abuses
in the provinces of Aceh, Irian Jaya and elsewhere have come under investigation,
along with its role in political killings and kidnappings here in Jakarta.
And
Mr. Wahid has acted to undercut to power of the most politically aggressive
service, the army, by appointing naval and air force officers to a number
of key posts, including the armed forces chief of staff.
In
a move three weeks ago that crystallized the shifting balance of power,
Mr. Wahid fired the military's spokesman, Major General Sudrajat, who had
frequently been critical of his policies.
In
one of his last, injudicious statements, the general had posed what seemed
to be a direct challenge to civilian authority, asserting that the president
"does not have the right to interfere in the affairs of the military."
Total
of 72 banks suffered losses in 1999
Asia
Pulse - February 18, 2000
Jakarta
-- A total of 72 national banks suffered combined losses of Rp38.7 trillion
(US$5.5 billion) last year, while 92 others managed to register profit,
a study said.
The
study conducted by the research bureau of Infobank magazine on 164 national
banks, a copy of which was made available on Thursday, suggested the loss
was lower than the previous year's Rp62.49 trillion.
By
September 1999, among the banks suffering the greatest loss were those
taken over by the government or joining the recapitalization program. They
were Bank Niaga (JSX:BNGA), Bank Danamon (JSX:BDMN), Bank Duta, BII (JSX:BNII),
Lippo Bank (JSX:LPBN), Bank Universal (JSX:BUNV) and state banks Bank Mandiri,
BTN and BNI (JSX:BBNI).
Despite
the losses, most of the banks saw improved profitability last year. Infobank
noted there were two factors enabling the banks to keep their losses down.
First,
some of the large banks had recovered from the so-called "negative spread"
disease following the central bank's decision to lower interest on time
deposits from January to September 1999. Second, the policy to restructure
banking credits had in stages improved the quality of credits. It also
noted most of the banks that posted big profit last year had low cost of
fund.
In
terms of balance sheets, most of the banks saw remarkable expansion of
assets. The banking sector's assets grew by 29.69 percent to Rp812.13 trillion.
The same also applied to the public fund which rose by 33.11 percent to
Rp768.155 trillion. The banks also saw improvement in their capital. By
September 1999, a total of 13 national banks had capital adequacy ratio
(CAR) below 4 percent.
Infobank
predicted until the middle of this year banks with low cost of fund would
have the greater chance to make large profit because they would continue
to speculate in Bank Indonesia's short-term promissory notes (SBI). They
were also expected to extend credits to the consumer loan sector and the
medium-and small-sized trade sector.
Indonesia
economy records growth
Associated
Press - February 16, 2000
Jakarta
-- Indonesia's economy grew 0.2 percent last year following its collapse
during the 1998 Asian financial meltdown, according to statistics released
Wednesday. The Central Statistics Bureau said the economy expanded 5.8
percent in the fourth quarter alone from a year ago. The economy grew 0.9
percent in the previous quarter. The economy's 14 percent decline in 1988
caused massive riots and public protests and led to the ouster Indonesia's
longtime authoritarian leader Suharto.
The
statistics bureau said 1999 economic growth was mainly driven by domestic
consumption -- especially a 1.5 percent increase in household consumption
and a 0.7 percent rise in government expenditure. It forecast the gross
domestic product would grow by 4.0 percent in 2000.
Astra
sell-off pilot role in debt war
Reuters
- February 13, 2000
Kate
Linebaugh -- Indonesia's bank rescue agency (Ibra) inched nearer to recouping
the cost of propping up the nation's lenders this week when it replaced
management at the country's biggest car-maker, clearing the way for the
agency to sell its 43 percent stake.
Once
that sale -- expected to raise about US$500 million -- is completed, though,
the two-year-old agency still has to find buyers for Bank Central Asia,
Bank Danamon, Bank Bali, Bank Niaga and hundreds of lesser-known assets.
And the job is only going to get tougher, analysts say.
Even
if it gets top dollar for everything it controls, Ibra faces a quandary:
a US$25 billion gap between the value of the assets and the recovery cost.
That is a lot of money in a country where annual wages average less than
US$1,000. "Where does the difference go?" said Ibra chairman Cacuk Sudarijanto.
"That debt will never get paid."
Ibra
was formed at the peak of Indonesia's financial crisis as the rupiah lost
as much as four-fifths of its value and interest rates passed 70 percent.
As the economy shrank 14 percent in 1998, Ibra took control of the assets
of interconnected companies and banks in return for propping up failing
lenders. If the nation's nascent economic recovery is to succeed, it must
now restructure the banking industry.
So
far, the bank rescue agency is on target to meet its asset- recovery target
by 31 March, Mr Cacuk said. With the planned sale of Astra -- Lazard Asia
Fund; Bhakti Investama, a publicly traded securities company linked to
George Soros' Quantum Fund; a consortium of US investors led by Gilbert
Global Equity and Newbridge Capital; and the Government of Singapore Investment
Corp have expressed interest -- Ibra is selling its crown jewel.
The
car-maker booked a profit of US$108 million last year, after two years
of losses. The same cannot be said of the country's banks. Bad loans reached
more than 80 percent of all loans at the height of the financial crisis
and, with few exceptions, the lenders are still losing money.
Analysts
say that will make it tough for Ibra, which has said it plans to raise
US$400 million from selling Bank Central Asia, and also has an eight percent
stake in First Pacific Co of Hong Kong. Meanwhile, Bank Mandiri, the country's
largest bank, also hopes to raise US$1.5 billion through an initial share
sale in August to repay the government for bailout funds.
Privatisations
will help fund part of the recovery cost. For the new budget year to 31
December, the government wants to raise 5.9 trillion rupiah (HK$6.49 billion)
this year selling state companies such as domestic call monopoly operator
Telekomunikasi Indonesia and dominant international call operator Indosat.
Still,
analysts believe the government will face a shortfall in the medium term
when bonds the government issued to help recapitalise the banking industry
begin maturing. And if it does not have enough cash to pay, many fear the
government may simply print money to fill the gap.
"The
question is how much money do they need to print in the end," said Qaisar
Hasan, head of research at Jardine Fleming in Jakarta. In late 1997, Indonesia
printed money to prop up its banking system, but most of that was then
taken out of the country by the delinquent bank owners -- contributing
to a surge in inflation to more than 80 percent in 1998.
Coupon
payments on the government bonds are expected to cost 178 trillion rupiah
-- almost the entire planned expenditure in this year's nine-month budget
-- between now and 2004, on top of the 643 trillion rupiah cost of fixing
the banks.
The
government sold 282 trillion rupiah in bonds with maturities of up to ten
years paying quarterly interest. More bonds will be sold this year for
Bank Negara Indonesia, Bank Niaga, and two other state banks. That will
bring the government's debt to 95 percent of its gross domestic product
by the middle of the year.
Still,
the newly independent central bank -- along with the International Monetary
Fund -- are unlikely to agree to increasing the money supply.
The
bonds could be refinanced on the country's fledgling domestic bond market,
said Miranda Goeltom, Bank Indonesia deputy governor. That will work as
long as it does not interfere with the government's target of reducing
its debt to 60 percent of GDP by 2010. Whatever the long-term cost, Indonesia
must begin selling assets to start paying for it immediately, said Kian
Guntur at Nomura Securities in Jakarta. "If they can get Astra out of the
system, hopefully it will trigger more interest," he said.