Home > South-East Asia >> Philippines | ![]() |
Philippine court OKs pact allowing US troops in local camps
Associated Press - January 12, 2016
Ten of the 15 members of the high court also ruled that the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, which was signed by US and Philippine officials in 2014 and has a 10-year lifespan, is an executive agreement that does not need Senate approval, court spokesman Theodore Te said.
"EDCA is not constitutionally infirm as an executive agreement," Te said at a news conference after the justices' long-awaited vote.
The ruling will bolster US efforts to reassert its presence in Asia and dovetails with Philippine efforts to harness America's help in addressing what it perceives as China's aggressive acts in the disputed South China Sea.
Washington immediately welcomed the court's decision, saying the defense pact is a mutually beneficial accord that will bolster both countries' ability to respond to disasters and strengthen the Philippine military.
Left-wing activists said they would consider filing an appeal, adding that US military presence won't solve the country's current worries over China in the disputed waters.
"This is another sad day for Philippine sovereignty," said left-wing activist Renato Reyes, who was one of those who challenged the legality of the defense accord before the high tribunal. "We maintain that the EDCA is not the solution to the problems of China's incursions.
The Philippines has turned to Washington as it scrambled to strengthen its military, one of the most ill-equipped in Asia, to deal with an increasingly assertive China in the South China Sea.
The long-simmering disputes involving China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei have escalated in recent years. Tensions have been especially high since Beijing transformed seven disputed reefs into islands on which it is now constructing runways and facilities that rival claimants say can be used militarily in an already very tense region.
[Associated Press writer Jim Gomez contributed to this report.]
See also:
![]() |